Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adding appConfiguration to view.metadata #223

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

keighrim
Copy link
Member

fixes #208

@keighrim keighrim requested a review from marcverhagen March 19, 2024 22:30
Copy link
Contributor

@marcverhagen marcverhagen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. The only thing I suggest is to change the name to appConfiguration. I like using configuration in the name, but with appConfiguredAs we make it a mini phrase rather than a nominal.

I also remember vaguely a worry that not using refinedParameters would break compatibility.

@keighrim
Copy link
Member Author

Changed the name.
Since we all reverted the commits where refinedParameter name were used, and we believe that no app were actually developed based on those commits/version to generate MMIFs with refinedParameter field, I don't think there'd be compatibility issues regarding the name.

@keighrim keighrim merged commit 013713b into develop Mar 20, 2024
@keighrim keighrim changed the title adding appConfiguredAs to view.metadata adding appConfiguration to view.metadata Mar 20, 2024
@keighrim keighrim deleted the 208-configuredAs branch March 20, 2024 22:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

recording runtime parameters and runtime configurations
2 participants