-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 787
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Vendor c/common:9d025e4cb348
#5710
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oops, I’m afraid I didn’t think to look at the Buildah CLI for users (I was assuming that the Buildah code vendored into Podman would cover all of the Buildah codebase).
- It’s … not entirely clear to me that
buildah images --filter … singleImageName
is expected. But the old code did implement that, so making an effort might make sense. - Reading how
args
is treated, it always has either 0 or 1 elements. So, I think we don’t really need animagesByNames
set; if we have a single name to look up, deal with that one name.
11ae3e2
to
d480f2d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@Honny1 can you rebase this, looks like there is merge conflict now |
Looks like I do not have approve power here either. |
Signed-off-by: Jan Rodák <[email protected]>
d480f2d
to
ed881ab
Compare
@Luap99 I made a rebase. |
/lgtm |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Honny1, Luap99, rhatdan The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
This PR vendor pre-release version of
c/common:9d025e4cb348
fixes containers/podman#23331. It also adapts the code to the newc/common/libimage
API.What type of PR is this?
In pre-release version of c/common is fixed flake containers/podman#23331. This fix changes API of c/common. So it needs adapt the code to the new
c/common/libimage
API. And avoid unexpected issue for next vendor dance./kind flake
What this PR does / why we need it:
How to verify it
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes containers/podman#23331
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?