Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix potential race condition in testing #8541

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 1, 2020

Conversation

rhatdan
Copy link
Member

@rhatdan rhatdan commented Dec 1, 2020

The It("podman wait to pause|unpause condition"... test is
flaking every so often when a messages is sent in the second
function to a channel. It is my believe that in between the time
the first function sends a message to the channel and before it closes
the channel the second errChan=make() has happened. This would mean that
the fist function closes the second errChan, and then when the second
function sends a message to the second errChan, it fails and blows up with
the error you are seeing.

By creating a different variable for the second channel, we eliminate the race.

Fixes: #6518

Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh [email protected]

The It("podman wait to pause|unpause condition"... test is
flaking every so often when a messages is sent in the second
function to a channel.  It is my believe that in between the time
the first function sends a message to the channel and before it closes
the channel the second errChan=make() has happened.  This would mean that
the fist function closes the second errChan, and then when the second
function sends a message to the second errChan, it fails and blows up with
the error you are seeing.

By creating a different variable for the second channel, we eliminate the race.

Fixes: containers#6518

Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 1, 2020
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member Author

rhatdan commented Dec 1, 2020

@edsantiago PTAL
@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Dec 1, 2020

LGTM

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

STWATTM(*)

  • Seems Totally Worth A Try To Me

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member Author

rhatdan commented Dec 1, 2020

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 1, 2020
@rhatdan rhatdan added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 1, 2020
@containers containers deleted a comment from edsantiago Dec 1, 2020
@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member Author

rhatdan commented Dec 1, 2020

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 1, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit c71ad9a into containers:master Dec 1, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 24, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 24, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CI flake: Panic in Spec Teardown: send on closed channel
6 participants