docs: add module documentation testing #12762
Conversation
|
Waiting for the testing ADR. |
github-actions
bot
added
C:Simulations
C:x/distribution
|
I wanted to link the distribution simulation as an example in the docs, and I've noticed it was moved to the wrong place (https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/12889/files#diff-f096725763ac01d0861d6f6d43cec03997c13b0397e1916a8284ed0d6f4e55be). I've moved them back where they should be. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #12762 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 53.73% 54.05% +0.32%
==========================================
Files 645 645
Lines 55238 55238
==========================================
+ Hits 29682 29860 +178
+ Misses 23178 22999 -179
- Partials 2378 2379 +1
|
| order: 1 | ||
| --> | ||
|
|
||
| # Dependency Injection |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This will be added after #12633. I am for keeping this boilerplate, as it permits me to link the testing documentation to here.
|
|
||
| +++ https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/simapp/app_config.go | ||
|
|
||
| +++ https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/simapp/app.go |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We should open an issue to fill this out. Generally not a fan of just linking code as it doesn't explain why this and why that. This wouldn't provide much info to a new user.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As docs.cosmos.network default on v0.46, a new user won't see it until he digs.
I can remove the code, but I am really for to keep these files, as this allows me to already link to them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Totally fine it keep them, mainly thinking it would be useful to also break it down
Description
Explains how the Cosmos SDK is tested and how a module should be tested.
This follow the testing refactoring happening in the SDK.
Ref: #12696, #12398, #11899
cc @marbar3778 @alexanderbez @kocubinski @AmauryM @facundomedica
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!to the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking change