Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: add missing modules accounts and group in modules list #23125

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2024

Conversation

hattizai
Copy link
Contributor

@hattizai hattizai commented Dec 30, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added documentation for new "Accounts" module
    • Added documentation for new "Group" module
    • Updated documentation link for building modules reference

@hattizai hattizai requested a review from a team as a code owner December 30, 2024 07:40
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 30, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the x/README.md file by adding two new modules: "Accounts" and "Group". These modules provide infrastructure for creating smart accounts and managing on-chain multisig accounts, respectively. Additionally, the documentation link for building modules has been corrected to reflect the updated URL structure in the Cosmos SDK documentation.

Changes

File Change Summary
x/README.md - Added "Accounts" module documentation reference
- Added "Group" module documentation reference
- Updated documentation link for building modules

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

C:x/accounts, backport/v0.52.x

Suggested reviewers

  • hieuvubk
  • sontrinh16
  • julienrbrt

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4f3f401 and 85753cb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • x/README.md (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
x/README.md (1)

Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"

🔇 Additional comments (3)
x/README.md (3)

9-9: LGTM! Well-documented module entry

The "Accounts" module entry is clear, concise, and follows the established documentation pattern. The description effectively communicates the module's purpose.


22-22: LGTM! Well-documented module entry

The "Group" module entry is clear, concise, and follows the established documentation pattern. The description effectively communicates the module's purpose.


33-33: LGTM! Documentation link updated correctly

The link to the building modules documentation has been updated to reflect the current URL structure in the Cosmos SDK documentation.

Let's verify if the documentation link is accessible:

✅ Verification successful

Documentation link is valid and accessible

The link https://docs.cosmos.network/main/build/building-modules/intro returns a 200 HTTP status code, confirming that it's a valid and accessible URL. The documentation reference has been correctly updated.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the documentation link is accessible
curl -s -I "https://docs.cosmos.network/main/build/building-modules/intro" | head -n 1

Length of output: 98


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@tac0turtle tac0turtle enabled auto-merge December 30, 2024 09:03
@tac0turtle tac0turtle added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 30, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Dec 30, 2024
@tac0turtle tac0turtle added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 30, 2024
Merged via the queue into cosmos:main with commit dafa93f Dec 30, 2024
69 of 72 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants