-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 285
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some fixes to my pull request for other underlines #904
Open
AhoyISki
wants to merge
3
commits into
crossterm-rs:master
Choose a base branch
from
AhoyISki:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -101,16 +101,6 @@ Attribute! { | |||||
/// Underlines the text. | ||||||
Underlined = 4, | ||||||
|
||||||
// Other types of underlining | ||||||
/// Double underlines the text. | ||||||
DoubleUnderlined = 2, | ||||||
/// Undercurls the text. | ||||||
Undercurled = 3, | ||||||
/// Underdots the text. | ||||||
Underdotted = 4, | ||||||
/// Underdashes the text. | ||||||
Underdashed = 5, | ||||||
|
||||||
/// Makes the text blinking (< 150 per minute). | ||||||
SlowBlink = 5, | ||||||
/// Makes the text blinking (>= 150 per minute). | ||||||
|
@@ -151,6 +141,16 @@ Attribute! { | |||||
NotFramedOrEncircled = 54, | ||||||
/// Turns off the `OverLined` attribute. | ||||||
NotOverLined = 55, | ||||||
// Other types of underlining | ||||||
|
||||||
/// Double underlines the text. | ||||||
DoubleUnderlined = 2, | ||||||
/// Undercurls the text. | ||||||
Undercurled = 3, | ||||||
/// Underdots the text. | ||||||
Underdotted = 4, | ||||||
/// Underdashes the text. | ||||||
Underdashed = 5, | ||||||
} | ||||||
|
||||||
impl Display for Attribute { | ||||||
|
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ impl Attribute { | |||||
/// | ||||||
/// See <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSI_escape_code#SGR_parameters> | ||||||
pub fn sgr(self) -> String { | ||||||
if (self as usize) > 4 && (self as usize) < 9 { | ||||||
if (self as usize) > 23 { | ||||||
return "4:".to_string() + SGR[self as usize].to_string().as_str(); | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||
} | ||||||
SGR[self as usize].to_string() | ||||||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you elaborate on this check change? Before there was a range check of 5..9 and now everything above 23?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was changed to reduce the number of checks.
Previously, the special underlines were in the middle of the enum, so you had to check for a lower and an upper bound whenever they came up.
Now, I moved them to the end, so you only have to check for a lower bound.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey, just asking real quick, but are there plans for merging this PR? Any other concerns with its contents? I'm asking because I have a crate that depends on my github version, and it is not possible to depend on a github version when publishing to crates.io
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
23 makes it difficult to work out how this code works and makes the code fragile to changes. Would this work better? It still assumes that the underline types are sequential, but makes it easier to understand what bounds are in play here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that is more clear, but you can remove the second check since the maximum value is known to be
<= (Self::Underdashed as usize)
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's safe unless you add some other variant at the end, or you move the options back somewhere within the enum like they were originally. Putting upper and lower bounds on the check makes it clear that the rationale is that these options are contiguous in the enums variants. I'd guess that having this check is unlikely to be on the hot path (and is probably even compiled out in a release build).