Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat(errors): Enhance PastepwnError class and testing suite #232

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat(errors): Enhance PastepwnError class and testing suite #232

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

jimprovs
Copy link

  • Add test case for handling empty messages
  • Introduce test case for None messages
  • Validate class's handling of custom object messages
  • Strengthen Unicode message handling through testing
  • Expand testing to cover integer messages and multiple arguments

@jimprovs
Updated to add 4 more unit test cases: empty message, none message, c…
7ffbb56 
…ustom object, and unicode message.
@jimprovs
feat(errors): Enhance PastepwnError class and testing suite
70fd89f 
- Add test case for handling empty messages
- Introduce test case for None messages
- Validate class's handling of custom object messages
- Strengthen Unicode message handling through testing
- Expand testing to cover integer messages and multiple arguments
@jimprovs
feat(errors): Enhance PastepwnError class and testing suite
bfd384f 
- Add test case for handling empty messages
- Introduce test case for None messages
- Validate class's handling of custom object messages
- Strengthen Unicode message handling through testing
- Expand testing to cover integer messages and multiple arguments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@d-Rickyy-b d-Rickyy-b d-Rickyy-b approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@jimprovs @d-Rickyy-b