2022 ditau #395
2022 ditau #395
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is this one needed still?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is this one needed still?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this just a modification of HiggsTauTauPlot.py to support Run3 plotting as well? If so then it would be better to merge these changes with the HiggsTauTauPlot.py script to have everything in one place
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would suggest to not push this one to the main branch but keep it on our personal branch only
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would suggest to not push this one to the main branch but keep it on our personal branch only
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we should revert this to the version on the main branch
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would suggest to not push this one to the main branch but keep it on our personal branch only
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would suggest to not push this one to the main branch but keep it on your personal branch only
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we can revert this one to the version on the main branch
| @@ -554,11 +568,17 @@ namespace ic { | |||
| btag_label = "pfDeepCSVJetTags:probb"; | |||
| btag_label_extra = "pfDeepCSVJetTags:probbb"; | |||
| } | |||
| if (era_ == era::data_2022_preEE || era_ == era::data_2022_postEE) { | |||
| btag_wp = 0.4184; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should the b-tag WP cut not be different for 2022?
| @@ -585,6 +605,9 @@ namespace ic { | |||
| if (era_ == era::data_2018 || era_ == era::data_2018UL) { | |||
| deepjet_wp = 0.2770; | |||
| } | |||
| if (era_ == era::data_2022_preEE || era_ == era::data_2022_postEE) { | |||
| deepjet_wp = 0.2770; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
should this cut not be different for 2022?
| @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ TVector3 GenIP (ic::GenParticle *h, ic::GenParticle *t) { | |||
| if(era_ == era::data_2016UL_postVFP) graph_name+="_2016UL_postVFP"; | |||
| if(era_ == era::data_2017UL) graph_name+="_2017UL"; | |||
| if(era_ == era::data_2018UL) graph_name+="_2018UL"; | |||
| if(era_ == era::data_2022_preEE) graph_name+="_2022_preEE"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I dont think we measure this correction for 2022 so this graph should either not get used or pick up the graph used for 2018
| @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ TVector3 GenIP (ic::GenParticle *h, ic::GenParticle *t) { | |||
| if(era_ == era::data_2016UL_postVFP) graph_name+="_2016UL_postVFP"; | |||
| if(era_ == era::data_2017UL) graph_name+="_2017UL"; | |||
| if(era_ == era::data_2018UL) graph_name+="_2018UL"; | |||
| if(era_ == era::data_2022_preEE) graph_name+="_2022_preEE"; | |||
| if(era_ == era::data_2022_postEE) graph_name+="_2022_postEE"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
same comment as for L 78
UROP Progress: 2018 vs 2022 Tau data to data analysis and 2022 Run3 analysis