Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: upgrade to ZMQ 6.0 using dashd-zmq client #70

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Alex-Werner
Copy link

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

As we have a implementation for 6.0 in js-dashd-zmq available which shares practically the same API that the one we currently have, and because 6.0 is meant to fix some fundamentals issues and that as highlighted by #69 we do have some issue with ZMQ.
We decided to start the discussion around a migration towards it.

What was done?

  • update to ZMQ 6.0 using dashd-zmq.

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

@Alex-Werner Alex-Werner requested a review from antouhou December 2, 2020 09:04
package.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
lib/services/dashd.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Alex-Werner Alex-Werner requested a review from Cofresi December 10, 2020 15:45
Copy link

@Cofresi Cofresi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looking good!

@coolaj86
Copy link

coolaj86 commented Jun 20, 2023

Good news: zeromq.js 6 might be better than zeromq.js 5 (which is in various states of buggy and broken)

Bad news: 3 years later and zeromq.js 6 is left incomplete.

🤷‍♂️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants