Switch to ruff #9
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
because it's way quicker mainly and can fix as well as complain
cwmeijer
force-pushed
the
switch_to_ruff
branch
from
756b495
to
bc5b8d8
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
switch to ruff for linting because it's much faster. It's also easy to live with, but so was prospector. However, prospector took 60 seconds which made it infeasible for using with pre-commit. Ruff does it in a couple of seconds.
Merge #6 before merging this.
There is one linter issue still, breaking the linting check which can be fixed later. See #11.