Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add faqwiki.py as english source #2238

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 9, 2024
Merged

add faqwiki.py as english source #2238

merged 4 commits into from
Feb 9, 2024

Conversation

camp00000
Copy link

Closes #2233

Adds a new source as requested in the aforementioned issue.

I used #2232 as my template, though I was able to get a lot more consistent metadata out of this one compared to the previous one.

Tested manually like so python -m lncrawl -s https://faqwiki.us/the-100th-regression-of-the-max-level-player/ and it worked as intended.

Also tested the search works as well: python -m lncrawl -q mage --sources https://faqwiki.us/ though it doesn't remove the suffix there, but when actually choosing and downloading one it does.

@camp00000 camp00000 mentioned this pull request Jan 21, 2024
sources/en/f/faqwiki.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sources/en/f/faqwiki.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@camp00000
Copy link
Author

As you've assigned yourself as a reviewer I'm not sure if I should've resolved the discussions myself after the newest commit, @CryZFix is it alright like this or should I usually wait for the reviewer to resolve discussions instead after my ammending commits &/ comments?

@camp00000 camp00000 requested a review from CryZFix February 6, 2024 21:53
@dipu-bd dipu-bd merged commit 69a3067 into dipu-bd:dev Feb 9, 2024
4 checks passed
@camp00000 camp00000 deleted the faqwiki branch March 10, 2024 12:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants