Refactor to remove XMLUtils.getDocumentBuilder #3
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jelovirt
force-pushed
the
feature/xmlutils
branch
from
35979ee to
f6e57f3
Compare
Signed-off-by: Jarno Elovirta <[email protected]>
jelovirt
force-pushed
the
feature/xmlutils
branch
from
f6e57f3 to
147acbd
Compare
Signed-off-by: Jarno Elovirta <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jarno Elovirta <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Refactor to remove use of static
XMLUtils.getDocumentBuilder().Motivation and Context
Static
XMLUtils.getDocumentBuilder()has been changed to an instance method is newer DITA-OT versions. To help with backwards and forwards compatibility, create newDocumentBuilderwithout the utility method.How Has This Been Tested?
Type of Changes