Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve CSR processing and logging, make connection verification optional #35

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

jschlyter
Copy link
Member

@jschlyter jschlyter commented Dec 17, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new parameter for CA server verification in the StepClient configuration.
    • Added a new boolean field to manage CA server verification settings.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced CSR verification process with improved logging and validation logic.
  • Documentation

    • Updated method signatures to reflect new parameters and functionality.
  • Tests

    • Removed obsolete function calls related to CSR verification from test cases.

@jschlyter jschlyter marked this pull request as ready for review December 17, 2024 19:18
@jschlyter jschlyter requested a review from a team as a code owner December 17, 2024 19:18
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces modifications across multiple files in the nodeman package, focusing on certificate signing request (CSR) verification and configuration. The changes primarily involve updating the StepClient and InternalCertificateAuthority classes to support more flexible CSR verification, adding a new ca_server_verify configuration option, and improving logging practices. The modifications enhance the control flow of CSR processing and provide more granular control over certificate authority server verification.

Changes

File Change Summary
nodeman/internal_ca.py - Renamed verify_x509_csr_signature to verify_x509_csr
- Added validate_name parameter to verify_x509_csr
- Initialized class-specific logger
nodeman/server.py - Added ca_server_verify parameter to get_step_client method
nodeman/settings.py - Added new ca_server_verify boolean field to StepSettings class
nodeman/step.py - Added ca_server_verify parameter to StepClient constructor
- Enhanced logging in sign_csr method
- Modified CA server verification logic
nodeman/x509.py - Introduced new verify_x509_csr function
- Added validate_name parameter to verify_x509_csr_data
tests/test_internal_ca.py - Removed import and call to verify_x509_csr_data
tests/test_step_ca.py - Removed import and call to verify_x509_csr_data

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant StepClient
    participant CertificateAuthority
    participant X509Verifier

    Client->>StepClient: Request CSR Signing
    StepClient->>X509Verifier: Verify CSR Signature
    X509Verifier-->>StepClient: Signature Validation Result
    StepClient->>X509Verifier: Verify CSR Data
    X509Verifier-->>StepClient: Data Validation Result
    StepClient->>CertificateAuthority: Sign CSR
    CertificateAuthority-->>StepClient: Signed Certificate
Loading

Possibly Related PRs

Suggested Reviewers

  • morkrost

Poem

🐰 Certificates dance with grace,
Verification finds its place,
Logs now whisper, clear and bright,
CSRs signed with newfound might!
A rabbit's code, both smart and light 🔐


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2d4778c and 4c21cfa.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • nodeman/internal_ca.py (3 hunks)
  • nodeman/server.py (1 hunks)
  • nodeman/settings.py (1 hunks)
  • nodeman/step.py (2 hunks)
  • nodeman/x509.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/test_internal_ca.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/test_step_ca.py (1 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jschlyter jschlyter merged commit 3ecb950 into main Dec 17, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
@jschlyter jschlyter deleted the misc_ca_csr_fixes branch December 17, 2024 19:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant