-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Krusell rios rull #136
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Krusell rios rull #136
Conversation
@kwkak37, could you remind me of the status of this? My recollection is that you didn't quite get it working, but I don't have a sense of whether the amount of further work required would be modest or large. If relatively modest, maybe I could hire you to do a bit of RA work to get it over the finish line. It would be nice to have this as a real REMARK. |
To Chris,
Hello, this is Kyung Woong.
I am looking through my code for Krusell and Rios-Rull (1999) again; the
main problem that I had was that it was difficult to have individual
households with their most preferred tax rates at either minimum available
tax rate (for those above mean income) or the maximum available tax rate
(for those below mean income).
I still need to check whether I am computing all the equilibrium conditions
(Euler equation, etc.) with the income tax rate incorporated in them; it
may be larger than I think. I don't have a very good idea myself of how
long this would take, but this is still something that I would like to
finish.
Sincerely,
Kyung Woong
…On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 3:03 PM Christopher Llorracc Carroll < ***@***.***> wrote:
@kwkak37 <https://github.com/kwkak37>, could you remind me of the status
of this? My recollection is that you didn't quite get it working, but I
don't have a sense of whether the amount of further work required would be
modest or large. If relatively modest, maybe I could hire you to do a bit
of RA work to get it over the finish line. It would be nice to have this as
a real REMARK.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#136 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQNSTD57FAGZBH3DDCE3HDTWSGYJLANCNFSM5W2EEBHA>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
KW (Kyung Woong is too long to type every time!):
Was checking in because we are cleaning up and organizing REMARKs. If this
were completed and working, it would be a fine addition to the library.
Probably it would be good for you do because it seems to connect with your
core interests fairly well.
I will be happy to publish it as a "REMARK" if you get it to the point
where it can reproduce the key Krusell-Rios-Rull results.
…On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 9:54 AM kwkak37 ***@***.***> wrote:
To Chris,
Hello, this is Kyung Woong.
I am looking through my code for Krusell and Rios-Rull (1999) again; the
main problem that I had was that it was difficult to have individual
households with their most preferred tax rates at either minimum available
tax rate (for those above mean income) or the maximum available tax rate
(for those below mean income).
I still need to check whether I am computing all the equilibrium conditions
(Euler equation, etc.) with the income tax rate incorporated in them; it
may be larger than I think. I don't have a very good idea myself of how
long this would take, but this is still something that I would like to
finish.
Sincerely,
Kyung Woong
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 3:03 PM Christopher Llorracc Carroll <
***@***.***> wrote:
> @kwkak37 <https://github.com/kwkak37>, could you remind me of the status
> of this? My recollection is that you didn't quite get it working, but I
> don't have a sense of whether the amount of further work required would
be
> modest or large. If relatively modest, maybe I could hire you to do a bit
> of RA work to get it over the finish line. It would be nice to have this
as
> a real REMARK.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#136 (comment)>,
or
> unsubscribe
> <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQNSTD57FAGZBH3DDCE3HDTWSGYJLANCNFSM5W2EEBHA
>
> .
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#136 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKCK73JLJWCVG2LV2IHQU3WS2XBTANCNFSM5W2EEBHA>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
- Chris Carroll
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
No description provided.