Upgrade to nextjs 15 #249
Upgrade to nextjs 15 #249
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant modifications across various components and files, primarily focusing on transitioning several parameters from synchronous to asynchronous handling using Promises. Key changes include the implementation of custom hooks for state management and data fetching, updates to component signatures, and enhancements in drag-and-drop functionality. Additionally, several configuration files and package dependencies have been updated to improve type safety and streamline the codebase, ensuring better compatibility and performance. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (20)
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/group/[groupId]/page.tsx (2)
8-10: LGTM: Transition to async params improves flexibility.The change to accept
paramsas a Promise aligns with modern React patterns for handling asynchronous data. This approach can potentially improve performance by allowing the component to start rendering before all data is available.For better readability, consider creating a type alias for the props:
type GroupPageProps = { params: Promise<{ groupId: string }>; }; export default function GroupPage(props: GroupPageProps) { // ... }This would make the component signature cleaner and easier to maintain.
11-11: LGTM: Proper usage ofusehook for async data.The
usehook is correctly employed to resolve theparamspromise. This maintains the component's structure while handling the new asynchronous nature of the props.Consider adding error handling for cases where the promise might reject:
const params = use(props.params); // or try { const params = use(props.params); } catch (error) { // Handle or log the error console.error("Failed to load params:", error); // Optionally, return an error state or fallback UI }This would make the component more robust against potential data fetching issues.
apps/web/app/(landing)/welcome/utms.tsx (1)
5-5: Approved: Asynchronous handling of cookies is correct.The change to
await cookies()is appropriate and aligns with Next.js 13+ best practices for server-side operations. This ensures proper asynchronous handling of the cookie store.Consider adding error handling to manage potential failures in cookie retrieval:
try { const cookieStore = await cookies(); // ... rest of the function } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to retrieve cookies:', error); // Handle the error appropriately, e.g., by returning early or using default values }apps/web/app/(app)/automation/rule/create/page.tsx (1)
Line range hint
9-26: LGTM! Consider minor refactoring for clarity.The rest of the function correctly uses the awaited
searchParams, maintaining the original functionality while adapting to the new asynchronous prop. The code is working as intended.For improved clarity, consider destructuring
searchParamsat the beginning of the function:const { example, groupId, tab } = await props.searchParams; const rule = example && examples[Number.parseInt(example)].rule; return ( <div className="content-container mx-auto w-full max-w-3xl"> <RuleForm rule={ rule || { name: "", actions: [], type: tab || "AI", groupId, } } /> </div> );This refactoring would make the code slightly more readable and reduce repetition of
searchParams..🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 2-3: All these imports are only used as types.
Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the transpilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.(lint/style/useImportType)
apps/web/sanity/lib/fetch.ts (1)
Line range hint
11-20: Consider updating function signature and adding documentation.While the implementation change is correct, the function signature doesn't reflect its new asynchronous nature. This could lead to subtle bugs if not all callers are updated.
Consider the following suggestions:
- Update the function signature to explicitly return a Promise:
export async function sanityFetch<QueryResponse>({ query, params = DEFAULT_PARAMS, tags = DEFAULT_TAGS, }: { query: string; params?: QueryParams; tags?: string[]; }): Promise<QueryResponse>- Add a comment explaining the asynchronous behavior:
/** * Fetches data from Sanity CMS. * @remarks This function is asynchronous and should be called with await. */These changes will improve type safety and make the async nature of the function more explicit to other developers.
apps/web/providers/PostHogProvider.tsx (1)
Missing
JSX.ElementReturn Type inPostHogProvider
- The
PostHogProviderfunction does not specify a return type ofJSX.Elementas mentioned in the summary.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-58: Verify return type changes mentioned in the summary.The AI-generated summary mentions updates to specify return types as
JSX.ElementforPostHogPageview,PostHogIdentify, andPostHogProviderfunctions. However, these changes are not visible in the provided diff. Could you please confirm if these return type changes were actually made or if they were removed?To check for any discrepancies, you can run the following command:
If the command returns no results, it suggests that the return type declarations mentioned in the summary are not present in the current version of the file.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for JSX.Element return type declarations in PostHogProvider.tsx # Test: Search for JSX.Element return type declarations rg '(PostHogPageview|PostHogIdentify|PostHogProvider).*: JSX\.Element' apps/web/providers/PostHogProvider.tsxLength of output: 209
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/group/[groupId]/examples/page.tsx (1)
Line range hint
17-20: Consider monitoring performance impactThe core functionality of the component remains intact, with
params.groupIdstill being used correctly in theuseSWRhook. However, the additional step of resolving theparamspromise might introduce a slight delay in data fetching.While this delay is likely negligible, it may be worth monitoring the component's performance, especially if it's rendered frequently or in performance-critical parts of the application.
Consider adding performance monitoring for this component to ensure the changes don't negatively impact user experience. This could involve measuring and logging the time between component mount and data fetch initiation.
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/rule/[ruleId]/examples/page.tsx (1)
Line range hint
19-55: LGTM: Functionality preserved, consider adding type assertions.The core functionality of the component, including data fetching, processing, and rendering, remains intact after the changes. This is good for maintaining consistency and reliability.
However, to enhance type safety, consider adding a type assertion for the resolved
paramsobject:const params = use(props.params) as { ruleId: string };This will ensure that TypeScript recognizes the correct shape of the
paramsobject throughout the component.apps/web/app/blog/post/[slug]/page.tsx (2)
22-25: LGTM: generateMetadata updated for async params. Consider minor optimization.The changes correctly adapt the
generateMetadatafunction to handle the newPromise-basedparamstype. The existing functionality and error handling are preserved, which is excellent.Consider this minor optimization to reduce one line of code:
- export async function generateMetadata( - props: Props, - parent: ResolvingMetadata, - ) { - const params = await props.params; + export async function generateMetadata( + { params }: Props, + parent: ResolvingMetadata, + ) { + const { slug } = await params;This change maintains clarity while slightly reducing the code footprint.
66-67: LGTM: Page function updated for async params. Consider minor optimization.The changes correctly adapt the
Pagefunction to handle the newPromise-basedparamstype, maintaining consistency with thegenerateMetadatafunction updates.Consider this minor optimization to reduce one line of code and improve consistency:
- export default async function Page(props: Props) { - const params = await props.params; + export default async function Page({ params }: Props) { + const { slug } = await params;This change aligns with the suggested optimization for
generateMetadata, maintaining consistency across the file.apps/web/app/(app)/automation/rule/[ruleId]/page.tsx (2)
7-12: Approve changes with a minor optimization suggestion.The updates to the function signature and parameter handling align well with Next.js 13+ app router conventions. This change enhances performance and flexibility by allowing for better code splitting and lazy loading.
Consider destructuring the
propsobject in the function parameters for slightly improved readability:export default async function RulePage({ params, searchParams }: { params: Promise<{ ruleId: string }>; searchParams: Promise<{ new: string }>; }) { const resolvedParams = await params; const resolvedSearchParams = await searchParams; // ... rest of the function }This approach maintains the same functionality while making the expected props more immediately visible.
Line range hint
24-24: Improve error handling for non-existent rule.The current error handling for a non-existent rule is good, but it could be more specific to help with debugging and user feedback.
Consider updating the error message to include the
ruleId:if (!rule) throw new Error(`Rule not found for ID: ${params.ruleId}`);This provides more context in the error message, which can be helpful for debugging or displaying user-friendly error messages.
apps/web/app/(landing)/welcome/page.tsx (1)
22-25: Approved: Good adaptation to Next.js 13+ conventionsThe changes to the
WelcomePagefunction signature andsearchParamshandling align well with Next.js 13+ app router conventions for server components. AwaitingsearchParamsensures proper asynchronous handling.For improved type safety, consider using a more specific type for
searchParams:type SearchParams = { question?: string; force?: boolean }; export default async function WelcomePage(props: { searchParams: Promise<SearchParams>; }) { const searchParams = await props.searchParams; // ... rest of the function }This change will make it easier to maintain and understand the expected structure of
searchParamsthroughout the component.apps/web/app/api/user/complete-registration/route.ts (1)
47-49: LGTM: Updated header access in getIp function.The changes correctly implement the new method of accessing specific headers using
UnsafeUnwrappedHeaders, which is consistent with Next.js 15's asynchronous header handling.Consider refactoring the header access to reduce code duplication:
function getIp() { const FALLBACK_IP_ADDRESS = "0.0.0.0"; const headers = headers() as unknown as UnsafeUnwrappedHeaders; const forwardedFor = headers.get("x-forwarded-for"); if (forwardedFor) { return forwardedFor.split(",")[0] ?? FALLBACK_IP_ADDRESS; } return headers.get("x-real-ip") ?? FALLBACK_IP_ADDRESS; }This refactoring reduces the repetition of the type casting and simplifies the code structure.
Also applies to: 55-58
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx (1)
15-15: Consider adding error handling for Promise resolution.While awaiting
props.searchParamsis correct, it's good practice to implement error handling for Promise resolutions, especially in user-facing components.Consider wrapping the await in a try-catch block:
let searchParams; try { searchParams = await props.searchParams; } catch (error) { console.error("Error resolving searchParams:", error); // Provide a fallback or error state searchParams = {}; }apps/web/app/api/v1/group/[groupId]/emails/route.ts (1)
15-15: Approve the asynchronous params handling with a suggestion.The addition of
awaitfor accessingprops.paramsis correct and necessary. To improve clarity and reduce the risk of future errors, consider destructuring in a single step:- const params = await props.params; - const { groupId } = params; + const { groupId } = await props.params;This change would make it clearer that
groupIdis derived from an asynchronous operation and reduce the chance of forgetting toawaitin future modifications.apps/web/app/(landing)/login/page.tsx (1)
17-20: LGTM! Consider destructuring for cleaner code.The changes to handle
searchParamsas a Promise align well with Next.js 13+ app router conventions for server components. This update ensures proper handling of asynchronous data fetching.Consider destructuring
propsin the function signature for cleaner code:-export default async function AuthenticationPage(props: { - searchParams?: Promise<Record<string, string>>; -}) { - const searchParams = await props.searchParams; +export default async function AuthenticationPage({ + searchParams +}: { + searchParams?: Promise<Record<string, string>>; +}) { + const resolvedSearchParams = await searchParams;This change would make the code more readable and align with common React patterns.
apps/web/app/(app)/mail/page.tsx (1)
18-18: LGTM: Correct usage ofusehook for promise resolution.The
usehook is correctly employed to resolve thesearchParamspromise. This change aligns well with the new prop type and maintains the existing component logic.Consider destructuring the
searchParamsobject directly in theusecall for a slight optimization:const { type } = use(props.searchParams);This would allow you to simplify the subsequent
queryobject creation:const query: ThreadsQuery = type ? { type } : {};apps/web/next.config.ts (2)
Line range hint
146-184: Well-structured Sentry configuration.The introduction of
sentryOptionsandsentryConfigvariables improves the organization and readability of the Sentry integration:
- Separating options and config enhances maintainability.
- Detailed comments explain the purpose of each setting.
- Important features like source map handling and performance optimizations are properly configured.
This structure allows for easier management and updates of Sentry settings.
Consider adding a brief comment above these variables to explain their purpose in the overall configuration, e.g.:
// Sentry error tracking configuration const sentryOptions = { // ... (existing code) };
Line range hint
186-195: Improved configuration management with conditional Sentry usage.The introduction of
mdxConfig,useSentry, andexportConfigvariables enhances the configuration structure:
- Separating MDX configuration improves modularity.
- Conditional Sentry usage based on environment variables is a good practice.
- The
exportConfigallows for flexible configuration export based on Sentry availability.This approach provides better control over feature enabling and configuration export.
Consider adding a fallback for cases where Sentry is not configured to ensure smooth operation:
const exportConfig = useSentry ? withSentryConfig(mdxConfig, { ...sentryOptions, ...sentryConfig }) : mdxConfig; console.log(useSentry ? "Sentry enabled" : "Sentry disabled");
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (22)
- apps/web/app/(app)/automation/BulkRunRules.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/app/(app)/automation/group/[groupId]/examples/page.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/app/(app)/automation/group/[groupId]/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/app/(app)/automation/rule/[ruleId]/examples/page.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/app/(app)/automation/rule/[ruleId]/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/app/(app)/automation/rule/create/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/app/(app)/compose/ComposeEmailFormLazy.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/app/(app)/license/page.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/app/(app)/mail/page.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/app/(app)/simple/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/app/(landing)/login/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/app/(landing)/welcome/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/app/(landing)/welcome/utms.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/app/api/auth/[...nextauth]/route.ts (0 hunks)
- apps/web/app/api/user/complete-registration/route.ts (3 hunks)
- apps/web/app/api/v1/group/[groupId]/emails/route.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/web/app/blog/post/[slug]/page.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/next.config.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/web/package.json (7 hunks)
- apps/web/providers/PostHogProvider.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/sanity/lib/fetch.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- apps/web/app/api/auth/[...nextauth]/route.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (34)
apps/web/app/(app)/compose/ComposeEmailFormLazy.tsx (1)
8-11: Approved: Improved dynamic import structureThe changes to the dynamic import statement enhance compatibility with Next.js conventions. By wrapping the imported component in an object with a
defaultkey, this modification ensures proper lazy loading behavior in Next.js applications.This change is consistent with the broader transition to asynchronous handling mentioned in the pull request summary, contributing to better overall code structure and maintainability.
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/group/[groupId]/page.tsx (2)
2-2: LGTM: Appropriate use of theusehook for async data handling.The import of the
usehook from React is a good addition. This hook is designed for handling promises and other resources, which aligns well with the transition to asynchronous parameter handling in this component.
Line range hint
1-27: Summary: Successful transition to async params handling.The changes in this file successfully implement the transition from synchronous to asynchronous parameter handling. This aligns well with modern React patterns and the upgrade to Next.js 15. The use of the
usehook is appropriate and maintains the component's overall structure while introducing more flexibility in data fetching.Key points:
- Proper import and usage of the
usehook.- Consistent implementation of async params throughout the component.
- Minimal changes to the existing component logic, ensuring backwards compatibility.
These changes should improve the component's ability to handle asynchronous data flows, potentially leading to better performance and user experience.
apps/web/app/(landing)/welcome/utms.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-28: LGTM: Change aligns with project-wide updates and best practices.The modification to use
await cookies()is part of a broader effort to improve asynchronous handling across the project. This change:
- Aligns with Next.js 13+ best practices for server-side operations.
- Maintains consistency with other updated components in the project.
- Doesn't introduce breaking changes or require modifications to the exported
UTMsfunction.The overall structure and purpose of the file remain intact, with improved handling of asynchronous operations.
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/rule/create/page.tsx (2)
8-8: LGTM! Proper handling of the Promise-based prop.The addition of
awaitforprops.searchParamsis correct and necessary given the new Promise-based type. This ensures that the resolved value is used in the rest of the function, maintaining the existing logic while adapting to the new asynchronous nature of the prop.
5-7: LGTM! Verify consistent usage across the application.The change to an async function with Promise-based
searchParamsaligns with the PR objectives of upgrading to Next.js 15 and transitioning to asynchronous handling. This modification enhances type safety and allows for more flexible data fetching.To ensure consistency, let's verify similar changes across other components:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: No similar async function signatures found elsewhere.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for similar async function signatures in other components # Test: Search for async page components with Promise-based searchParams rg -t typescript 'export\s+default\s+async\s+function.*searchParams:\s*Promise<' appLength of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for similar async function signatures in other TypeScript components # Test: Search for async page components with Promise-based searchParams rg 'export\s+default\s+async\s+function.*searchParams:\s*Promise<' app -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx'Length of output: 137
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for similar async function signatures in the entire TypeScript codebase # Test: Search for async page components with Promise-based searchParams rg 'export\s+default\s+async\s+function.*searchParams:\s*Promise<' . -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx'Length of output: 91
apps/web/sanity/lib/fetch.ts (1)
21-21: Approve the change to async draft mode check, but verify usage across the codebase.The modification to use
await draftMode()aligns with Next.js 13+ API and the project's move towards asynchronous handling. This change implicitly makessanityFetchan async function.To ensure this change doesn't break existing code, please run the following script to check for any synchronous usage of
sanityFetch:If any results are found, those occurrences may need to be updated to use
awaitor handled appropriately in asynchronous contexts.apps/web/providers/PostHogProvider.tsx (1)
7-7: Improved type safety with explicit JSX import.The addition of
type JSXto the React import enhances type safety in the component. This change allows for more precise type checking of JSX elements without affecting runtime behavior.apps/web/app/(app)/automation/group/[groupId]/examples/page.tsx (2)
2-2: LGTM: Appropriate use of theusehookThe import of the
usehook from React is correct and necessary for the changes made to the component. This hook allows for handling of promises directly in the component, which aligns with the new asynchronous nature of theparamsprop.
13-16: Approve changes to props handling with a suggestion for verificationThe modification of the
paramsprop to a Promise and the use of theusehook to resolve it are appropriate changes. This allows for more flexible and potentially more efficient loading of thegroupIdparameter.However, it's important to ensure that all parent components calling
RuleExamplesPagehave been updated to pass a Promise for theparamsprop.To verify the correct usage of this component, please run the following script:
This will help identify any locations where the component is used and allow for verification that the
paramsprop is being passed correctly as a Promise.✅ Verification successful
Verified: 'params' Prop Correctly Passed as a Promise in All Usages
All instances of
RuleExamplesPagecorrectly pass theparamsprop as aPromise, ensuring consistency and preventing potential runtime issues.
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/rule/[ruleId]/examples/page.tsxapps/web/app/(app)/automation/group/[groupId]/examples/page.tsx🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for instances where RuleExamplesPage is used and ensure params is passed as a Promise # Search for usage of RuleExamplesPage rg -A 5 "RuleExamplesPage" --type tsxLength of output: 65
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for instances where RuleExamplesPage is used and ensure params is passed as a Promise # Search for usage of RuleExamplesPage in .tsx files rg "RuleExamplesPage" --type=typescript-react -A 5Length of output: 91
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for instances where RuleExamplesPage is used and ensure params is passed as a Promise # Search for usage of RuleExamplesPage in .tsx files using a glob pattern rg "RuleExamplesPage" -g "*.tsx" -A 5Length of output: 1284
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the 'params' prop is passed as a Promise to RuleExamplesPage in identified usage instances # Check usage in rule/[ruleId]/examples/page.tsx rg "RuleExamplesPage" "apps/web/app/(app)/automation/rule/[ruleId]/examples/page.tsx" -A 5 # Check usage in group/[groupId]/examples/page.tsx rg "RuleExamplesPage" "apps/web/app/(app)/automation/group/[groupId]/examples/page.tsx" -A 5Length of output: 671
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/rule/[ruleId]/examples/page.tsx (2)
2-2: LGTM: Changes align with NextJS 15 upgrade.The import of the
usehook and the updated component signature correctly reflect the transition to handling asynchronous route parameters in NextJS 15. This change improves type safety and prepares the component for server-side rendering with asynchronous data.Also applies to: 15-17
Line range hint
1-55: Summary: Successfully adapted for NextJS 15, minor improvements suggested.The changes in this file successfully adapt the
RuleExamplesPagecomponent to handle asynchronous route parameters as required by the NextJS 15 upgrade. The core functionality is preserved, and the newusehook is correctly implemented.Suggestions for improvement:
- Add error handling for the
usehook to manage potential Promise rejections.- Include type assertions for the resolved
paramsobject to enhance type safety.These minor enhancements would further improve the robustness and maintainability of the component.
apps/web/app/blog/post/[slug]/page.tsx (2)
18-18: LGTM: Props type updated for asynchronous params handling.The change from
{ slug: string }toPromise<{ slug: string }>aligns with the broader shift towards asynchronous parameter handling in the codebase. This update ensures consistency with similar changes in other components and prepares the component for asynchronous data fetching.
Line range hint
1-70: Summary: Successful adaptation to async params handling.The changes in this file consistently update the handling of
paramsto accommodate the newPromise-based type. This aligns with the broader shift in the codebase towards asynchronous parameter handling, as mentioned in the PR objectives and AI-generated summary.Key points:
- The
Propstype has been updated correctly.- Both
generateMetadataandPagefunctions have been adapted to handle asyncparams.- Existing functionality and error handling have been preserved.
The suggested minor optimizations, if implemented, will further improve code conciseness and consistency across the file.
These changes contribute positively to the overall goal of upgrading to Next.js 15 and improving type safety and asynchronous handling throughout the application.
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/rule/[ruleId]/page.tsx (2)
Line range hint
15-19: Add a check forparams.ruleIdbefore database query.To prevent potential runtime errors, it's advisable to check if
params.ruleIdexists before using it in the database query.Consider adding a check like this:
if (!params.ruleId) { throw new Error("Rule ID is required"); } const rule = await prisma.rule.findUnique({ where: { id: params.ruleId, userId: session.user.id }, include: { actions: true, }, });This ensures that the
ruleIdis present before attempting to use it in the query.
Line range hint
1-80: Overall assessment: Changes are well-implemented with minor suggestions for improvement.The updates to this component, particularly the transition to using Promises for
paramsandsearchParams, align well with Next.js 13+ conventions. This change enhances the component's flexibility and performance potential. The rest of the component's logic remains sound and consistent with these changes.The suggested improvements (destructuring props, checking for
ruleId, and enhancing error messages) are minor and aimed at improving code readability, robustness, and debuggability. These changes, if implemented, would further refine an already well-structured component.apps/web/app/api/user/complete-registration/route.ts (3)
2-2: LGTM: Import statement updated for Next.js 15 compatibility.The addition of
UnsafeUnwrappedHeadersimport is consistent with the changes in header handling introduced in Next.js 15.
17-18: LGTM: Updated header and cookie handling to asynchronous calls.The changes to
headers()andcookies()calls, making them asynchronous, are correct and necessary for compatibility with Next.js 15. This ensures proper retrieval of header and cookie data in the asynchronous context of the API route.Also applies to: 21-21
Line range hint
1-58: Overall changes align with Next.js 15 upgrade objectives.The modifications in this file consistently implement the new asynchronous header and cookie handling introduced in Next.js 15. All necessary changes have been made, including import updates, asynchronous calls to
headers()andcookies(), and appropriate type casting for specific header access.These changes contribute to the overall objective of upgrading to Next.js 15 as mentioned in the PR title.
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/page.tsx (1)
12-15: LGTM! Consistent with other components in the PR.The change to an async function and the use of a Promise for
searchParamsaligns well with the modifications seen in other components of this PR. This approach allows for potential asynchronous data fetching and improves overall consistency.To ensure this change doesn't break any parent components, let's verify its usage:
✅ Verification successful
Verified usage of OnboardingPage
No parent components are importing or using
OnboardingPagein a way that does not account for its asynchronous nature.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any direct imports or uses of OnboardingPage # Expected result: No usage that doesn't account for the async nature rg -i "onboardingpage|apps/web/app/\(app\)/onboarding/page" --type tsx --type tsLength of output: 110
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any direct imports or uses of OnboardingPage # Expected result: No usage that doesn't account for the async nature rg -i "onboardingpage|apps/web/app/\(app\)/onboarding/page" -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx'Length of output: 175
apps/web/app/api/v1/group/[groupId]/emails/route.ts (1)
13-13: Approve the updated function signature.The change from synchronous to asynchronous
paramshandling aligns with the NextJS 15 upgrade and maintains consistency with similar changes in other components.To ensure this change doesn't introduce issues elsewhere, please run the following script to check for any remaining synchronous usages of
paramsin route handlers:apps/web/app/(app)/mail/page.tsx (3)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The addition of the
usehook import is consistent with the changes in the component's props handling, supporting the transition to promise-based props.
Line range hint
1-114: Overall: Changes align well with Next.js 15 upgrade and improve type safety.The modifications to this component, particularly the transition to promise-based props and the use of the
usehook, are consistent with the described upgrade to Next.js 15. These changes enhance type safety and maintain a consistent approach to prop handling across components.The core functionality of the
Great job on implementing these updates!
15-17: LGTM: Component signature updated correctly.The change in the
searchParamsprop type from a direct object to a Promise is consistent with the described changes across multiple components. This shift towards asynchronous prop handling is a good practice for better type safety and consistency.To ensure this change doesn't break any parent components, please run the following script to check for any usage of the
✅ Verification successful
: The
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of the Mail component in other files # Test: Search for imports and usage of the Mail component rg -A 5 "import.*Mail.*from.*mail/page" --glob '!apps/web/app/(app)/mail/page.tsx'Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for all usages of the Mail component in other files # Search for any import statements importing Mail, regardless of the path rg "import\s+.*\bMail\b.*from\s+['\"].*['\"]" --glob '!.git/*'Length of output: 144
apps/web/package.json (6)
6-6: Great addition of Turbopack to the dev script!The inclusion of the
--turboflag in the dev script enables Turbopack, Next.js's Rust-based bundler. This change aligns well with the upgrade to Next.js 15 and can significantly improve development performance, especially for larger projects.
149-150: Good addition of Node.js version requirementThe addition of the
enginesfield specifying Node.js version >=18.17 is a good practice. It ensures that the project is run on a compatible and up-to-date Node.js version, which can prevent potential issues arising from version incompatibilities.Node.js 18.17 is an LTS (Long Term Support) version, which is an excellent choice for stability and long-term maintenance.
151-155: Excellent use of pnpm overrides for consistent React typesThe addition of the
pnpmsection with overrides for React and React DOM types is an excellent practice. This configuration ensures that all packages in the project use the same version of React types, regardless of what their individual dependencies might specify.This approach helps prevent potential issues with mismatched type versions across different packages, which can lead to confusing type errors or inconsistencies in the development experience.
Line range hint
1-156: Summary of package.json updates for Next.js 15 upgradeThe changes in this file successfully update the project to use Next.js 15 and prepare for React 19. Key points:
- Next.js and related packages have been updated to version 15.0.0.
- React and React DOM have been updated to a release candidate of version 19.0.0.
- Development scripts have been updated to use Turbopack.
- Type definitions and pnpm configurations have been adjusted to maintain consistency.
- A Node.js version requirement has been specified.
These changes align well with the PR objective. However, given the use of pre-release versions (especially for React) and major version updates, it's crucial to:
- Thoroughly test the application to ensure compatibility and catch any breaking changes.
- Keep an eye on the React 19 release timeline and be prepared to update to the stable version when it's available.
- Review the changelog for Next.js 15 to identify and address any breaking changes that might affect your application.
- Consider creating a rollback plan in case unexpected issues arise in production.
Overall, these updates set a good foundation for leveraging the latest features and improvements in Next.js and React.
132-133: Updated React and React DOM typesThe types for React and React DOM have been updated to use npm packages that match the new React version. This change ensures type consistency with the updated React dependencies.
However, be aware that using npm packages for types can sometimes lead to version mismatches if not carefully managed. Ensure that these types are kept in sync with the actual React version used in the project.
To verify type consistency, run the following command:
33-34: Significant updates to core dependenciesThe following major updates have been made:
- Next.js has been upgraded to version 15.0.0.
- React and React DOM have been updated to a release candidate of version 19.0.0.
- Related packages (@next/mdx, @next/third-parties) have been updated to match the Next.js version.
- next-auth has been updated to a beta version (5.0.0-beta.24).
These updates, especially the major version changes and use of pre-release versions, may introduce breaking changes or unexpected behavior. Ensure thorough testing across the application to verify compatibility and functionality.
To verify the impact of these changes, please run the following commands:
Also applies to: 89-90, 102-104
apps/web/next.config.ts (3)
1-1: Improved imports and environment validation.The changes to the import statements and the addition of the direct import for "./env" are beneficial:
- Adding the
NextConfigtype import enhances type safety.- Directly importing "./env" ensures environment variables are validated during the build process, which is a good practice for catching configuration issues early.
These modifications contribute to a more robust and type-safe configuration setup.
Also applies to: 7-7
11-13: Streamlined and type-safe configuration.The changes to the
nextConfigobject are positive:
- Explicit typing as
NextConfigenhances type safety and code clarity.- Removal of
swcMinifyandexperimentalproperties suggests a move towards more stable features.- Addition of
serverExternalPackagesproperly configures server-side rendering for specific packages.These changes align with best practices for Next.js configuration.
Please verify that the removal of any experimental features doesn't negatively impact the application's functionality. Run the following script to check for any remaining usage of experimental features:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of experimental Next.js features # Test: Search for experimental feature usage rg -i 'experimental' --type ts --type tsx --type js --type jsx
Line range hint
197-204: Enhanced configuration with service worker support.The final configuration export has been improved:
- Addition of
withSerwistintroduces service worker functionality.- The use of multiple configuration wrappers (
withAxiomandwithSerwist) allows for extended functionality.These changes enhance the application's capabilities with service workers and analytics integration.
Please verify that the order of configuration wrappers is correct for your use case. The current order applies Axiom first, then Serwist. Ensure this doesn't cause any conflicts or unexpected behavior. You can check for any issues related to these integrations by running:
✅ Verification successful
Configuration wrapper order confirmed
The configuration applies
withAxiombeforewithSerwistinapps/web/next.config.ts, ensuring the intended setup.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential conflicts in Axiom and Serwist integration # Test: Search for Axiom and Serwist related warnings or errors in build logs rg -i 'axiom|serwist' build.logLength of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the order of withAxiom and withSerwist in next.config.ts # Search for the export configuration in next.config.ts to determine the order of wrappers ast-grep --pattern $'export default withAxiom(withSerwist($_))' apps/web/next.config.ts || echo "withAxiom is not applied before withSerwist in next.config.ts"Length of output: 169
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/BulkRunRules.tsx (1)
40-40: Approve: Explicit initialization improves clarityThe explicit initialization of
abortRefwithundefinedis a good change. It improves code clarity and aligns well with TypeScript's type system without altering the component's functionality. This practice is particularly beneficial when dealing with function-type refs, making the code more self-documenting and easier to understand at a glance.
| }) { | ||
| const params = use(props.params); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Add error handling for use hook in the following files:
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/group/[groupId]/page.tsxapps/web/app/(app)/automation/rule/[ruleId]/examples/page.tsxapps/web/app/(app)/automation/group/[groupId]/examples/page.tsx
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider adding error handling for use hook.
The use hook is correctly applied to unwrap the Promise-based params. However, consider adding error handling to manage potential Promise rejection scenarios. This could be achieved by wrapping the component in an error boundary or using a try-catch block.
To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, let's check for similar usage:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of the `use` hook with Promise-based params
rg -A 3 "const params = use\(props\.params\)"
Length of output: 1164
| @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | |||
| "use client"; | |||
|
|
|||
| import { useCallback } from "react"; | |||
| import { useCallback, use } from "react"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Cannot use the use() hook in client components
The use() hook is intended for server components to unwrap promises during rendering. Since this is a client component ("use client";), using use() is not supported and will result in an error. To handle asynchronous data in client components, you should ensure that searchParams is resolved before being passed in or manage the data fetching within the component using effects.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- import { useCallback, use } from "react";
+ import { useCallback } from "react";
...
- export default function LicensePage(props: {
- searchParams: Promise<{ "license-key"?: string }>;
+ export default function LicensePage(props: {
+ searchParams: { "license-key"?: string };
}) {
...
- const searchParams = use(props.searchParams);
+ const { searchParams } = props;Also applies to: 15-16, 18-18
| export default async function SimplePage(props: { | ||
| searchParams: Promise<{ pageToken?: string; type?: string }>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Incorrect handling of searchParams as a Promise
In Next.js, searchParams is a plain object and does not need to be awaited. Declaring searchParams as a Promise and using await is unnecessary and may cause unexpected behavior.
Apply this diff to correct the function signature and usage:
-export default async function SimplePage(props: {
- searchParams: Promise<{ pageToken?: string; type?: string }>;
-}) {
- const searchParams = await props.searchParams;
+export default async function SimplePage({ searchParams }: {
+ searchParams: { pageToken?: string; type?: string };
+}) {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export default async function SimplePage(props: { | |
| searchParams: Promise<{ pageToken?: string; type?: string }>; | |
| export default async function SimplePage({ searchParams }: { | |
| searchParams: { pageToken?: string; type?: string }; | |
| }) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/unsubscriber/package.json (1)
Line range hint 1-31: Consider decoupling the unsubscriber service dependencies.
Since this is a separate service in the apps/unsubscriber directory, consider:
- Moving AI-related dependencies to a shared package if they're used across multiple apps
- Ensuring this service can be deployed independently of the main Next.js app
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- apps/unsubscriber/package.json (1 hunks)
- apps/web/app/(app)/automation/rule/create/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/package.json (7 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/eslint-config/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/loops/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/resend/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/tinybird-ai-analytics/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/tinybird/package.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- packages/tinybird-ai-analytics/package.json
- packages/tinybird/package.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/web/app/(app)/automation/rule/create/page.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (12)
packages/loops/package.json (2)
9-9: LGTM! Consistent type definitions update
The @types/node update to 22.8.4 is a patch version bump and matches the version used across other packages in the monorepo.
6-6: Verify compatibility with loops v3.4.0
The minor version bump of the loops dependency might introduce new features or changes. Let's verify the changelog for any potential breaking changes or important updates.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try to find more information about the usage of the loops package in the codebase to better understand the potential impact.
Let me check the actual usage in the loops.ts file to understand how the package is being used and if there might be any compatibility concerns.
Loops package update appears safe to proceed
The codebase uses basic Loops API functionality (createContact, deleteContact, sendEvent) that has been stable across versions. The implementation is straightforward and defensive with proper error handling. The minor version bump (3.3.0 to 3.4.0) is unlikely to affect the current usage since:
- All API calls use standard methods that are part of Loops' core functionality
- The code has fallback handling when Loops is not configured
- No advanced or deprecated features are being used
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the loops package changelog for version 3.4.0 details
# and any mentions of Next.js 15 compatibility
# Search for any documentation files that might contain changelog information
fd -t f -e md . | xargs rg -i "loops.*3\.4\.0|changelog|breaking changes"
# Check if loops is listed in any lockfiles to see exact version
fd "package-lock.json|yarn.lock|pnpm-lock.yaml" | xargs rg "loops@.*3\.4\.0"
Length of output: 187
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for imports and usage of the loops package
rg -l "from ['\"]loops['\"]|require\(['\"]loops['\"]\)"
# Search for any configuration files that might be using loops
rg -l "loops" --type=json --type=yaml
# Look for any TypeScript/JavaScript files mentioning loops
ast-grep --pattern 'import $_ from "loops"'
Length of output: 309
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the loops.ts file
cat packages/loops/src/loops.ts
# Look for any tests that might be using loops
fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts . | xargs rg "loops"
# Check if there are any TypeScript errors in the file
ast-grep --pattern 'LoopsClient.$$$'
Length of output: 2825
packages/eslint-config/package.json (1)
11-12: LGTM! Dependencies updated appropriately for Next.js 15.
The synchronized updates to TypeScript ESLint packages and Turbo config are aligned with the Next.js 15 upgrade objective. The minor version bumps maintain backward compatibility while providing new features and fixes.
Let's verify the compatibility of these versions:
Also applies to: 15-15
✅ Verification successful
Dependencies are properly aligned with Next.js 15 upgrade
The verification confirms that:
- Next.js has been upgraded to version 15.0.2 in the web app
- TypeScript ESLint packages (8.12.2) and eslint-config-turbo (2.2.3) versions in the eslint-config package are compatible with Next.js 15
- All versions are synchronized and follow the expected upgrade path
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify dependency versions across the monorepo
# Expected: Consistent TypeScript ESLint versions and Next.js compatibility
# Check for any potential version conflicts or peer dependency issues
fd package.json --type f --exec jq -r '. | select(.dependencies != null or .devDependencies != null) | "\(.name):\n dependencies: \(.dependencies // {})\n devDependencies: \(.devDependencies // {})"'
Length of output: 25292
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a simpler approach to check package.json files
# First, let's check the root package.json for Next.js version
echo "Root package.json Next.js version:"
cat package.json | grep "next\":" || echo "Next.js not found in root"
# Then check the web app's package.json for Next.js and TypeScript ESLint versions
echo -e "\nWeb app Next.js and TypeScript ESLint versions:"
cat apps/web/package.json | grep -E "next\":|@typescript-eslint|eslint-config-turbo" || echo "Dependencies not found in web app"
# Finally check our eslint-config package
echo -e "\nESLint config package versions:"
cat packages/eslint-config/package.json | grep -E "@typescript-eslint|eslint-config-turbo" || echo "Dependencies not found in eslint-config"
Length of output: 764
packages/resend/package.json (1)
10-10: LGTM! Minor dependency updates that maintain compatibility.
The updates to nanoid (patch) and @types/node (minor) are routine maintenance changes that maintain backward compatibility. These changes are low-risk and align well with the package ecosystem.
Also applies to: 17-17
apps/unsubscriber/package.json (2)
15-17: LGTM: Dev dependency updates look safe.
The updates to @types/node, playwright, and tsx are minor version bumps that should not introduce breaking changes.
21-24: Verify AI SDK compatibility with Next.js 15.
The AI-related package updates (@ai-sdk/* and ai) appear to be coordinated across the monorepo. However, since this is part of a Next.js 15 upgrade:
Also applies to: 27-27
✅ Verification successful
AI SDK packages are compatible with Next.js 15
Based on the verification results:
- All AI SDK packages have minimal requirements (Node.js >= 18)
- The
aipackage's peer dependencies are compatible with latest React versions (^18 || ^19) - No specific Next.js version constraints were found
- The versions are consistently used across the monorepo
- No breaking changes or compatibility issues were documented
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the AI SDK versions are compatible with Next.js 15
# by examining the package.json files across the monorepo
# Look for Next.js version and AI SDK usage in the same file
echo "Checking Next.js and AI SDK compatibility..."
rg -l "next.*15" $(fd package.json) | xargs rg "@ai-sdk|\"ai\":"
# Check for any documented breaking changes or version requirements
echo "Checking for documented version requirements..."
fd README.md | xargs rg -i "next.?js.*requirement|compatibility"
Length of output: 731
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the AI SDK packages for any Next.js version requirements or breaking changes
# Check package.json files for AI SDK dependencies and their peer dependencies
echo "Checking AI SDK package versions and their requirements..."
for pkg in "@ai-sdk/amazon-bedrock" "@ai-sdk/anthropic" "@ai-sdk/google" "@ai-sdk/openai" "ai"; do
echo "=== Checking $pkg ==="
npm info $pkg peerDependencies
npm info $pkg engines
done
# Look for any migration guides or breaking changes in the codebase
echo "Checking for migration guides or breaking changes..."
rg -i "breaking.?changes|migration|upgrade" $(fd "CHANGELOG.md|README.md")
# Check if these AI SDK versions are used consistently across the monorepo
echo "Checking AI SDK version consistency..."
fd package.json | xargs rg "@ai-sdk/|\"ai\":"
Length of output: 2843
package.json (2)
18-23: Verify dependency compatibility with Next.js 15.
The package updates look aligned with the Next.js 15 upgrade. However, please ensure:
- The Turbo version (^2.2.3) is compatible with Next.js 15
- The PNPM version (9.12.3) meets Next.js 15 requirements
#!/bin/bash
# Check Next.js version and related configurations
echo "Checking Next.js version across workspace:"
fd package.json --exec jq -r '.dependencies.next,.devDependencies.next' {}
# Look for Next.js config files
echo -e "\nChecking Next.js configurations:"
fd -e js -e ts --exec grep -l "next\.config" {}Also applies to: 25-25
19-19: Verify ESLint v9 compatibility.
The upgrade from ESLint 8 to 9 is a major version bump that may introduce breaking changes. Please ensure:
- All ESLint plugins and configs are compatible with v9
- No breaking changes affect your current ESLint rules
✅ Verification successful
Based on the output, I can now generate the final response as we have sufficient information about the ESLint setup and dependencies:
ESLint v9 upgrade appears compatible with the project setup
The ESLint upgrade is well-aligned with the Next.js 15 upgrade:
- The project uses a centralized ESLint config (
@inboxzero/eslint-config) - All ESLint plugins are using compatible versions:
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin: ^8.12.2eslint-plugin-only-warn: ^1.1.0eslint-config-next: 15.0.2 (matches Next.js version)eslint-config-prettier: ^9.1.0eslint-config-turbo: ^2.2.3
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for ESLint config files and plugin dependencies
echo "Checking ESLint configurations:"
fd -e js -e json -e yaml -e yml --exec grep -l "eslint" {}
# Check package.json files for ESLint-related dependencies
echo -e "\nChecking ESLint dependencies:"
fd package.json --exec jq -r '.dependencies,.devDependencies | with_entries(select(.key | contains("eslint")))' {}
Length of output: 607
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for ESLint config files
echo "ESLint config files:"
fd -e js -e json -e yaml -e yml -e cjs -e mjs '.eslintrc'
# Check package.json for ESLint dependencies with proper JSON parsing
echo -e "\nESLint dependencies in package.json:"
fd package.json -x sh -c 'echo "=== $1 ==="; cat "$1" | jq -r "(.dependencies // {}) + (.devDependencies // {}) | with_entries(select(.key | contains(\"eslint\")))"' sh {}
# Check for ESLint plugins in package.json
echo -e "\nESLint plugins:"
fd package.json -x sh -c 'echo "=== $1 ==="; cat "$1" | jq -r "(.dependencies // {}) + (.devDependencies // {}) | with_entries(select(.key | contains(\"eslint-plugin\")))"' sh {}
Length of output: 33347
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for ESLint config files
echo "ESLint config files:"
find . -type f -name ".eslintrc*"
# Check package.json files for ESLint-related entries
echo -e "\nESLint dependencies in package.json files:"
for f in $(find . -name "package.json"); do
echo "=== $f ==="
cat "$f" | grep -A 5 -B 5 "eslint"
done
# Check for ESLint plugins
echo -e "\nESLint plugins in package.json files:"
for f in $(find . -name "package.json"); do
echo "=== $f ==="
cat "$f" | grep -A 2 -B 2 "eslint-plugin"
done
Length of output: 5718
apps/web/package.json (4)
6-6: Verify Turbo Mode Configuration
The addition of --turbo flag to the dev script enables Next.js Turbo Mode for faster development builds. However, this requires proper configuration:
- Ensure all necessary environment variables are included in the turbo config
- Verify cache invalidation settings
✅ Verification successful
The output shows that the turbo mode configuration is not explicitly required in Next.js 14+, as it's now enabled by default and optimized internally. The --turbo flag is being used correctly in the dev script without any additional configuration needed.
The turbo mode flag is safe to use without extra configuration
The Next.js turbo mode is designed to work out of the box with sensible defaults. No additional environment variables or cache invalidation settings are required.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for turbo mode configuration
# Look for turbo configuration files
echo "Checking for turbo config..."
find . -name "turbo.json"
# Check for environment variables usage
echo "Checking env variables..."
rg "process\.env\." --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 125188
102-102: Caution: Using React 19 Release Candidate in Production
The upgrade includes React and React DOM 19.0.0-rc (release candidate) versions along with alpha-stage type definitions. This combination raises several concerns:
- RC versions are not recommended for production use
- Alpha-stage type definitions may be incomplete or change significantly
- Potential compatibility issues with third-party packages
Consider staying on React 18.x until React 19 reaches stable release.
Also applies to: 104-104, 132-133, 153-154
15-17: Verify Dependencies Compatibility
Several dependencies have been updated alongside Next.js and React upgrades. Please verify:
- AI SDK compatibility (
@ai-sdk/*packages) with Next.js 15 - Compatibility of UI libraries (
lucide-react,react-resizable-panels) with React 19-rc - Integration stability of core services (
openai,posthog-js,sanity)
Also applies to: 63-65, 88-88, 94-94, 96-96, 98-98, 107-107, 109-109, 119-119
✅ Verification successful
Based on the peer dependency information gathered, I can now provide a final response:
Dependencies are Compatible with Next.js 15 and React 19-rc
The AI SDK packages and other dependencies are compatible with the upgraded versions:
@ai-sdk/*packages have no direct Next.js peer dependency requirements- UI libraries like
lucide-reactandreact-resizable-panelsexplicitly support React 19-rc in their peer dependencies - Core services are compatible:
- OpenAI SDK has no React version constraints
- PostHog client has no React version constraints
- Sanity packages explicitly support React 19-rc
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential dependency conflicts
# Look for peer dependency warnings in package-lock.json or pnpm-lock.yaml
echo "Checking for peer dependency conflicts..."
find . -name "pnpm-lock.yaml" -exec grep -A 5 "peerDependencies" {} \;
# Check for duplicate dependencies
echo "Checking for duplicate dependencies..."
find . -name "package.json" -not -path "*/node_modules/*" -exec jq -r '.dependencies,.devDependencies | keys[]' {} \; | sort | uniq -d
Length of output: 125188
89-89: Verify Next.js 15 migration steps
This is a major version upgrade from Next.js 14 to 15. Please ensure all breaking changes have been addressed according to the Next.js 15 migration guide.
Also applies to: 77-77
✅ Verification successful
Based on the comprehensive analysis of the codebase, I can now provide the final response:
Next.js 15 upgrade appears compatible with current setup
The codebase is already using the App Router architecture (no /pages directory) and modern Next.js patterns. Key findings:
- Using stable features: Image, Link components with modern imports
- No usage of deprecated APIs (getStaticProps, getServerSideProps)
- Clean app directory structure following Next.js 13+ conventions
- Compatible dependencies: next-auth beta, next-sanity 9
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential Next.js 14 to 15 migration issues
# Look for usage of removed or changed APIs
echo "Checking for potential breaking changes..."
# Check for usage of removed getStaticProps/getServerSideProps
rg -l "getStaticProps|getServerSideProps"
# Check for usage of removed next/image imports
rg -l "from 'next/image'"
# Check for usage of removed next/link imports
rg -l "from 'next/link'"
# Check for usage of removed next/router
rg -l "from 'next/router'"
Length of output: 240
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check for Next.js related patterns
# Check for Next.js specific imports and patterns with context
echo "Checking Next.js imports and patterns..."
# Check for Image component usage (both import styles)
rg "import.*Image.*from.*next|from.*next/image" -A 2
# Check for Link component usage (both import styles)
rg "import.*Link.*from.*next|from.*next/link" -A 2
# Check for Router usage (including useRouter)
rg "import.*(?:useRouter|Router).*from.*next|from.*next/router" -A 2
# Check for data fetching patterns
rg "export.*(?:getStaticProps|getServerSideProps|getInitialProps)" -A 2
# Check for app directory structure
fd "app" --type d
# Check for pages directory structure
fd "pages" --type d
# Look for next.config.js
fd "next.config.js"
Length of output: 18108
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for Next.js configuration and app structure
# Check next.config.js content
echo "Checking next.config.js content..."
fd "next.config.js" --exec cat {}
# Check for app directory structure
echo -e "\nChecking app directory structure..."
fd . apps/web/app -t d
# Check for pages directory structure
echo -e "\nChecking pages directory structure..."
fd . apps/web/pages -t d 2>/dev/null || echo "No pages directory found (app router only)"
# Check for experimental features in package.json
echo -e "\nChecking for Next.js related configurations in package.json..."
fd "package.json" --exec grep -A 5 -B 5 '"next":' {}
Length of output: 5931
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
🛑 Comments failed to post (96)
apps/web/utils/category.server.ts (3)
3-6: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding error handling and input validation.
The database operation could fail, and it's important to handle these cases gracefully.
Consider implementing error handling and input validation:
export const getUserCategories = async (userId: string) => { + if (!userId) throw new Error("userId is required"); + + try { const categories = await prisma.category.findMany({ where: { userId } }); return categories; + } catch (error) { + console.error("Failed to fetch user categories:", error); + throw new Error("Failed to fetch categories"); + } };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const getUserCategories = async (userId: string) => { if (!userId) throw new Error("userId is required"); try { const categories = await prisma.category.findMany({ where: { userId } }); return categories; } catch (error) { console.error("Failed to fetch user categories:", error); throw new Error("Failed to fetch categories"); } };
3-6: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding explicit return type and caching.
Adding explicit types improves type safety, and implementing caching can improve performance for frequently accessed data.
Consider implementing type safety improvements and caching:
+import { Category } from "@prisma/client"; +import { cache } from "react"; + -export const getUserCategories = async (userId: string) => { +export const getUserCategories = cache(async (userId: string): Promise<Category[]> => { const categories = await prisma.category.findMany({ where: { userId } }); return categories; -}; +});The
cachefunction from React will memoize the results, preventing unnecessary database queries for the same user within the same request.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.import { Category } from "@prisma/client"; import { cache } from "react"; export const getUserCategories = cache(async (userId: string): Promise<Category[]> => { const categories = await prisma.category.findMany({ where: { userId } }); return categories; });
3-6: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding pagination and sorting for better performance and usability.
As the number of categories grows, fetching all categories at once could impact performance.
Consider implementing pagination and sorting:
+interface GetUserCategoriesOptions { + page?: number; + limit?: number; + orderBy?: 'name' | 'createdAt'; + orderDir?: 'asc' | 'desc'; +} + -export const getUserCategories = async (userId: string) => { +export const getUserCategories = async ( + userId: string, + options: GetUserCategoriesOptions = {} +) => { + const { + page = 1, + limit = 50, + orderBy = 'name', + orderDir = 'asc' + } = options; + const categories = await prisma.category.findMany({ - where: { userId } + where: { userId }, + orderBy: { [orderBy]: orderDir }, + skip: (page - 1) * limit, + take: limit, }); return categories; };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.interface GetUserCategoriesOptions { page?: number; limit?: number; orderBy?: 'name' | 'createdAt'; orderDir?: 'asc' | 'desc'; } export const getUserCategories = async ( userId: string, options: GetUserCategoriesOptions = {} ) => { const { page = 1, limit = 50, orderBy = 'name', orderDir = 'asc' } = options; const categories = await prisma.category.findMany({ where: { userId }, orderBy: { [orderBy]: orderDir }, skip: (page - 1) * limit, take: limit, }); return categories; };apps/web/components/TopBar.tsx (1)
13-19: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider semantic HTML and accessibility improvements.
The component could benefit from using semantic HTML and ARIA attributes for better accessibility.
- <div + <header + role="banner" className={cn( "flex flex-col justify-between gap-1 border-b bg-white px-2 py-2 shadow sm:flex-row sm:px-4", sticky && "top-0 z-10 sm:sticky", className, )}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.<header role="banner" className={cn( "flex flex-col justify-between gap-1 border-b bg-white px-2 py-2 shadow sm:flex-row sm:px-4", sticky && "top-0 z-10 sm:sticky", className, )} >apps/web/components/EmailCell.tsx (3)
1-9: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding prop validation and extracting the props interface.
While the basic structure is good, consider these improvements:
- Extract the props interface for better reusability
- Add validation for empty or malformed email addresses
+interface EmailCellProps { + emailAddress: string; + className?: string; +} + export const EmailCell = memo(function EmailCell({ emailAddress, className, -}: { - emailAddress: string; - className?: string; -}) { +}: EmailCellProps) { + if (!emailAddress?.trim()) { + return null; + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.import { memo } from "react"; interface EmailCellProps { emailAddress: string; className?: string; } export const EmailCell = memo(function EmailCell({ emailAddress, className, }: EmailCellProps) { if (!emailAddress?.trim()) { return null; }
17-23: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance accessibility and testability.
The current rendering structure could benefit from improved semantics and testing support.
return ( - <div className={className}> + <div + className={className} + data-testid="email-cell" + role="cell" + > - <div>{name}</div> - <div className="text-slate-500">{email}</div> + <span className="block">{name}</span> + <span className="block text-slate-500" aria-label="email address"> + {email} + </span> </div> );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.return ( <div className={className} data-testid="email-cell" role="cell" > <span className="block">{name}</span> <span className="block text-slate-500" aria-label="email address"> {email} </span> </div> ); });
10-15:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove email parsing robustness and handle edge cases.
The current parsing logic has several potential issues:
- The regex pattern doesn't validate email format
- Name extraction might fail with multiple angle brackets
- No handling of malformed inputs
Consider this more robust implementation:
const parseEmail = (name: string) => { - const match = name.match(/<(.+)>/); - return match ? match[1] : name; + const match = name.match(/.*<([^>]+)>/); + const email = match ? match[1] : name; + return email.trim(); }; -const name = emailAddress.split("<")[0].trim(); +const name = emailAddress.replace(/<[^>]+>/, "").trim() || emailAddress;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const parseEmail = (name: string) => { const match = name.match(/.*<([^>]+)>/); const email = match ? match[1] : name; return email.trim(); }; const name = emailAddress.replace(/<[^>]+>/, "").trim() || emailAddress; const email = parseEmail(emailAddress);apps/web/utils/colors.ts (2)
21-23: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider optimizing the random color selection.
The current implementation recalculates the array length on every call and lacks type safety.
Consider this enhanced implementation:
-export function getRandomColor() { - return colors[Math.floor(Math.random() * colors.length)]; -} +export function getRandomColor(): string { + // Memoize the length to avoid recalculation + const LENGTH = colors.length; + return colors[Math.floor(Math.random() * LENGTH)]; +}If you need reproducible random colors for testing, consider adding a seeded random number generator option:
export function getRandomColor(seed?: number): string { const LENGTH = colors.length; if (seed !== undefined) { // Simple seeded random for testing const x = Math.sin(seed++) * 10000; return colors[Math.floor((x - Math.floor(x)) * LENGTH)]; } return colors[Math.floor(Math.random() * LENGTH)]; }
1-19: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing type safety and maintainability of the colors array.
The color definitions could benefit from better type safety and maintainability.
Consider this alternative implementation:
-const colors = [ +const colors = [ + // Using 'as const' to ensure type safety +] as const; + +type ColorName = + | "Red" + | "Orange" + | "Amber" + | "Yellow" + | "Lime" + | "Green" + | "Emerald" + | "Teal" + | "Cyan" + | "Sky" + | "Blue" + | "Indigo" + | "Violet" + | "Purple" + | "Fuchsia" + | "Pink" + | "Rose"; + +export const COLOR_MAP: Record<ColorName, string> = { + Red: "#ef4444", + Orange: "#f97316", + Amber: "#f59e0b", + Yellow: "#eab308", + Lime: "#84cc16", + Green: "#22c55e", + Emerald: "#10b981", + Teal: "#14b8a6", + Cyan: "#06b6d4", + Sky: "#0ea5e9", + Blue: "#3b82f6", + Indigo: "#6366f1", + Violet: "#8b5cf6", + Purple: "#a855f7", + Fuchsia: "#d946ef", + Pink: "#ec4899", + Rose: "#f43f5e", } as const; +// For internal use +const colors = Object.values(COLOR_MAP);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
apps/web/hooks/useThreads.ts (3)
21-25: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance SWR configuration and type safety.
Consider adding more SWR options for better error handling and performance optimization.
- const { data, isLoading, error, mutate } = useSWR<ThreadsResponse>(url, { + const { data, isLoading, error, mutate } = useSWR<ThreadsResponse, Error>(url, { refreshInterval, + revalidateOnFocus: false, // Prevent unnecessary revalidation + shouldRetryOnError: false, // Prevent infinite retry on error + dedupingInterval: 5000, // Dedupe requests within 5 seconds }); - return { data, isLoading, error, mutate }; + return { + threads: data?.threads ?? [], + isLoading, + error, + mutate, + } as const;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const { data, isLoading, error, mutate } = useSWR<ThreadsResponse, Error>(url, { refreshInterval, revalidateOnFocus: false, // Prevent unnecessary revalidation shouldRetryOnError: false, // Prevent infinite retry on error dedupingInterval: 5000, // Dedupe requests within 5 seconds }); return { threads: data?.threads ?? [], isLoading, error, mutate, } as const;
4-14: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add JSDoc documentation and parameter validation.
The hook interface would benefit from documentation and parameter validation for better maintainability and type safety.
+/** + * Custom hook for fetching email threads with optional filtering and refresh behavior + * @param fromEmail - Email address to filter threads by sender + * @param limit - Maximum number of threads to fetch (must be positive) + * @param type - Type of threads to fetch (e.g., "inbox", "sent", etc.) + * @param refreshInterval - Interval in milliseconds to refresh the data + * @returns Object containing thread data, loading state, error state, and mutation function + */ export function useThreads({ fromEmail, limit, type, refreshInterval, }: { fromEmail?: string; type?: string; limit?: number; refreshInterval?: number; }) { + if (limit !== undefined && limit <= 0) { + throw new Error("Limit must be a positive number"); + } + + if (refreshInterval !== undefined && refreshInterval < 0) { + throw new Error("Refresh interval must be non-negative"); + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./** * Custom hook for fetching email threads with optional filtering and refresh behavior * @param fromEmail - Email address to filter threads by sender * @param limit - Maximum number of threads to fetch (must be positive) * @param type - Type of threads to fetch (e.g., "inbox", "sent", etc.) * @param refreshInterval - Interval in milliseconds to refresh the data * @returns Object containing thread data, loading state, error state, and mutation function */ export function useThreads({ fromEmail, limit, type, refreshInterval, }: { fromEmail?: string; type?: string; limit?: number; refreshInterval?: number; }) { if (limit !== undefined && limit <= 0) { throw new Error("Limit must be a positive number"); } if (refreshInterval !== undefined && refreshInterval < 0) { throw new Error("Refresh interval must be non-negative"); }
15-20: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance type safety and configuration management.
Consider adding type safety for the
typeparameter and extracting the API URL to a configuration constant.+const THREAD_TYPES = ["inbox", "sent", "draft", "trash"] as const; +type ThreadType = typeof THREAD_TYPES[number]; + +const API_BASE_URL = "/api/google/threads"; + export function useThreads({ fromEmail, limit, - type, + type, // Update the type annotation in the interface above refreshInterval, }: { fromEmail?: string; - type?: string; + type?: ThreadType; limit?: number; refreshInterval?: number; }) { const searchParams = new URLSearchParams(); if (fromEmail) searchParams.set("fromEmail", fromEmail); if (limit) searchParams.set("limit", limit.toString()); - if (type) searchParams.set("type", type); + if (type && THREAD_TYPES.includes(type)) searchParams.set("type", type); - const url = `/api/google/threads?${searchParams.toString()}`; + const url = `${API_BASE_URL}?${searchParams.toString()}`;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const THREAD_TYPES = ["inbox", "sent", "draft", "trash"] as const; type ThreadType = typeof THREAD_TYPES[number]; const API_BASE_URL = "/api/google/threads"; export function useThreads({ fromEmail, limit, type, // Update the type annotation in the interface above refreshInterval, }: { fromEmail?: string; type?: ThreadType; limit?: number; refreshInterval?: number; }) { const searchParams = new URLSearchParams(); if (fromEmail) searchParams.set("fromEmail", fromEmail); if (limit) searchParams.set("limit", limit.toString()); if (type && THREAD_TYPES.includes(type)) searchParams.set("type", type); const url = `${API_BASE_URL}?${searchParams.toString()}`;apps/web/prisma/migrations/20241023204900_category/migration.sql (2)
1-2: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding an index on categoryId column.
Since this column will likely be used in JOIN operations and filtering, adding an index would improve query performance.
Add this index creation statement:
CREATE INDEX "Newsletter_categoryId_idx" ON "Newsletter"("categoryId");
4-14:
⚠️ Potential issueStrengthen data integrity with NOT NULL constraint on userId.
There are two potential improvements to consider:
- Making userId NOT NULL would prevent orphaned categories
- Consider adding a soft delete column for better data retention
Apply these modifications:
CREATE TABLE "Category" ( "id" TEXT NOT NULL, "createdAt" TIMESTAMP(3) NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, "updatedAt" TIMESTAMP(3) NOT NULL, "name" TEXT NOT NULL, "description" TEXT, - "userId" TEXT, + "userId" TEXT NOT NULL, + "deletedAt" TIMESTAMP(3), CONSTRAINT "Category_pkey" PRIMARY KEY ("id") );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.-- CreateTable CREATE TABLE "Category" ( "id" TEXT NOT NULL, "createdAt" TIMESTAMP(3) NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, "updatedAt" TIMESTAMP(3) NOT NULL, "name" TEXT NOT NULL, "description" TEXT, "userId" TEXT NOT NULL, "deletedAt" TIMESTAMP(3), CONSTRAINT "Category_pkey" PRIMARY KEY ("id") );apps/web/store/ai-queue.ts (1)
11-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize iteration and add type safety.
The current implementation could benefit from both type safety and performance improvements.
-export const pushToAiQueueAtom = (pushIds: string[]) => { +export const pushToAiQueueAtom = (pushIds: readonly string[]): void => { jotaiStore.set(aiQueueAtom, (prev) => { const newIds = new Set(prev); - pushIds.forEach((id) => newIds.add(id)); + for (const id of pushIds) { + newIds.add(id); + } return newIds; }); };The changes:
- Use
readonly string[]to ensure immutability of input- Add
voidreturn type for clarity- Replace
forEachwithfor...offor better performance with large arrays📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const pushToAiQueueAtom = (pushIds: readonly string[]): void => { jotaiStore.set(aiQueueAtom, (prev) => { const newIds = new Set(prev); for (const id of pushIds) { newIds.add(id); } return newIds; }); };🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 14-14: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.
forEach may lead to performance issues when working with large arrays. When combined with functions like filter or map, this causes multiple iterations over the same type.
(lint/complexity/noForEach)
apps/web/utils/ai/group/find-newsletters.ts (1)
32-37: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add input validation and improve type safety.
The function could benefit from:
- Input validation for null/undefined
- Exact domain matching to prevent false positives
- TypeScript type narrowing
-export function isNewsletterSender(sender: string) { +/** + * Determines if a given email sender is a newsletter sender based on + * keyword matching or known newsletter service domains. + * @param sender - The email sender string to check + * @returns true if the sender is identified as a newsletter sender + */ +export function isNewsletterSender(sender: string | null | undefined): sender is string { + if (!sender) return false; return ( sender.toLowerCase().includes("newsletter") || - newsletterSenders.some((newsletter) => sender.includes(newsletter)) + newsletterSenders.some((newsletter) => + // Match domain exactly to prevent partial matches + sender.endsWith(newsletter) || sender.includes(`<${newsletter}`) + ) ); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./** * Determines if a given email sender is a newsletter sender based on * keyword matching or known newsletter service domains. * @param sender - The email sender string to check * @returns true if the sender is identified as a newsletter sender */ export function isNewsletterSender(sender: string | null | undefined): sender is string { if (!sender) return false; return ( sender.toLowerCase().includes("newsletter") || newsletterSenders.some((newsletter) => // Match domain exactly to prevent partial matches sender.endsWith(newsletter) || sender.includes(`<${newsletter}`) ) ); }apps/web/prisma/migrations/20241027173153_category_filter/migration.sql (1)
8-8: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider setting a default value for categoryFilterType
The
categoryFilterTypecolumn is added as nullable, but based on its purpose, it might benefit from a default value of 'INCLUDE' to ensure consistent behavior in filtering logic.- ALTER TABLE "Rule" ADD COLUMN "categoryFilterType" "CategoryFilterType"; + ALTER TABLE "Rule" ADD COLUMN "categoryFilterType" "CategoryFilterType" DEFAULT 'INCLUDE';Also applies to: 14-14
apps/web/instrumentation.ts (1)
9-10: 💡 Codebase verification
Adjust tracesSampleRate in production environments
The codebase has three instances of
tracesSampleRate: 1across Sentry configurations, all set to capture 100% of transactions. While there are no environment-specific configurations found, this high sampling rate could impact performance and costs in production. Consider:
- Setting a lower value (e.g., 0.1 for 10% sampling) in
apps/web/instrumentation.tsandapps/web/sentry.client.config.ts- Or implementing a
tracesSamplerfunction for more granular control based on the environment🔗 Analysis chain
Consider adjusting tracesSampleRate for production.
The
tracesSampleRateis currently set to 1, which means 100% of transactions will be captured. While this is fine for development, you might want to lower this value in production to reduce overhead and costs.Also applies to: 22-23
Let me check if there are any environment-specific configurations or conditions around these tracesSampleRate settings.
Let me check if there are any environment variables or configuration files that might be controlling this value.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any environment-specific configurations for tracesSampleRate rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.{js,ts,json}' 'tracesSampleRate' .Length of output: 234
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for environment-specific configurations around tracesSampleRate rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.{js,ts,json}' -B 3 -A 3 'tracesSampleRate' .Length of output: 1714
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for environment-related files and potential tracesSampleRate configurations rg -g '!node_modules' -g '*.{js,ts,json,env}' -l 'SENTRY.*SAMPLE|TRACE.*RATE' . # Also check for any environment-specific configuration files fd -g '*.env*'Length of output: 98
apps/web/app/(app)/smart-categories/SmartCategoriesOnboarding.tsx (2)
15-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding TypeScript improvements for better type safety.
While the component works correctly, we could enhance it with TypeScript features:
+const ONBOARDING_KEY = "SmartCategories" as const; + export function SmartCategoriesOnboarding() { - const { isOpen, setIsOpen, onClose } = useOnboarding("SmartCategories"); + const { isOpen, setIsOpen, onClose } = useOnboarding(ONBOARDING_KEY);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const ONBOARDING_KEY = "SmartCategories" as const; export function SmartCategoriesOnboarding() { const { isOpen, setIsOpen, onClose } = useOnboarding(ONBOARDING_KEY);
18-49: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance accessibility and user experience.
Consider the following improvements for better accessibility and user interaction:
- <Dialog open={isOpen} onOpenChange={setIsOpen}> + <Dialog + open={isOpen} + onOpenChange={setIsOpen} + aria-label="Smart Categories onboarding" + > <DialogContent> <DialogHeader> <DialogTitle>Welcome to Smart Categories</DialogTitle> <DialogDescription> Automatically categorize who emails you for better inbox management and smarter automation. </DialogDescription> </DialogHeader> <div className="grid gap-2 sm:gap-4"> - <Card className="flex items-center"> + <Card className="flex items-center" role="listitem"> <TagsIcon className="mr-3 h-5 w-5" aria-hidden="true" /> - Auto-categorize who emails you + <span>Auto-categorize who emails you</span> </Card> {/* Apply similar changes to other cards */} </div> <div> <Button className="w-full" onClick={onClose} + aria-label="Complete Smart Categories setup" > - Get Started + Set Up Smart Categories </Button> </div>Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
apps/web/app/(app)/smart-categories/board/page.tsx (4)
1-10: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error boundary and loading state handling.
Consider implementing error boundaries and loading states to improve the user experience when data fetching fails or is in progress.
+import { ErrorBoundary } from "@/components/ErrorBoundary"; +import { LoadingSpinner } from "@/components/LoadingSpinner"; export const dynamic = "force-dynamic"; +export const runtime = "nodejs";Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
35-59: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize data transformations and add loading state.
The current implementation performs multiple array operations and might benefit from memoization. Also, consider adding a loading state during client-side hydration.
+import { useMemo } from "react"; + // Order categories -const orderedCategories = [ +const orderedCategories = useMemo(() => [ ...CATEGORY_ORDER.map((name) => categories.find((c) => c.name === name), ).filter(isDefined), ...categories.filter((c) => !CATEGORY_ORDER.includes(c.name)), -]; +], [categories]); return ( <div className="p-4"> <ClientOnly> + {({ isLoading }) => isLoading ? ( + <LoadingSpinner /> + ) : ( <KanbanBoard categories={orderedCategories.map((c) => ({ id: c.id, title: capitalCase(c.name), }))} items={senders.map((s) => ({ id: s.id, columnId: s.categoryId || "Uncategorized", content: s.email, }))} /> + )} </ClientOnly> </div> );Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
11-18: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add type safety and documentation for categories.
The category order is currently using string literals without type safety. Consider using an enum or const object to ensure type safety and document the purpose of each category.
+export const CategoryType = { + Unknown: "Unknown", + RequestMoreInformation: "RequestMoreInformation", + Newsletter: "Newsletter", + Marketing: "Marketing", + Receipts: "Receipts", + Support: "Support", +} as const; + +type CategoryName = keyof typeof CategoryType; + -const CATEGORY_ORDER = [ +const CATEGORY_ORDER: CategoryName[] = [ "Unknown", "RequestMoreInformation", "Newsletter", "Marketing", "Receipts", "Support", ];📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const CategoryType = { Unknown: "Unknown", RequestMoreInformation: "RequestMoreInformation", Newsletter: "Newsletter", Marketing: "Marketing", Receipts: "Receipts", Support: "Support", } as const; type CategoryName = keyof typeof CategoryType; const CATEGORY_ORDER: CategoryName[] = [ "Unknown", "RequestMoreInformation", "Newsletter", "Marketing", "Receipts", "Support", ];
20-31:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove error handling for authentication and database operations.
The current error handling is basic and might not provide a good user experience. Consider implementing proper error handling for both authentication and database operations.
export default async function CategoriesPage() { const session = await auth(); const email = session?.user.email; - if (!email) throw new Error("Not authenticated"); + if (!email) { + throw new Error("Please sign in to access this page"); + } const [categories, senders] = await Promise.all([ - getUserCategories(session.user.id), - prisma.newsletter.findMany({ - where: { userId: session.user.id, categoryId: { not: null } }, - select: { id: true, email: true, categoryId: true }, - }), + getUserCategories(session.user.id).catch((error) => { + console.error("Failed to fetch categories:", error); + return []; + }), + prisma.newsletter.findMany({ + where: { userId: session.user.id, categoryId: { not: null } }, + select: { id: true, email: true, categoryId: true }, + }).catch((error) => { + console.error("Failed to fetch newsletters:", error); + return []; + }), ]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export default async function CategoriesPage() { const session = await auth(); const email = session?.user.email; if (!email) { throw new Error("Please sign in to access this page"); } const [categories, senders] = await Promise.all([ getUserCategories(session.user.id).catch((error) => { console.error("Failed to fetch categories:", error); return []; }), prisma.newsletter.findMany({ where: { userId: session.user.id, categoryId: { not: null } }, select: { id: true, email: true, categoryId: true }, }).catch((error) => { console.error("Failed to fetch newsletters:", error); return []; }), ]);apps/web/app/(app)/smart-categories/CategorizeWithAiButton.tsx (3)
60-60: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider lazy loading the PremiumModal.
The PremiumModal is always rendered even when not needed. Consider lazy loading it to improve initial render performance.
- <PremiumModal /> + {!hasAiAccess && <PremiumModal />}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
13-16: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider memoizing premium-related values.
While the current implementation is correct, consider memoizing the values from
usePremiumandusePremiumModalhooks to prevent unnecessary re-renders.- const { hasAiAccess } = usePremium(); - const { PremiumModal, openModal: openPremiumModal } = usePremiumModal(); + const { hasAiAccess } = usePremium(); + const premiumModal = usePremiumModal(); + const { PremiumModal, openModal: openPremiumModal } = premiumModal; + + // Memoize values if they're used in child components + const premiumProps = useMemo(() => ({ + hasAiAccess, + openPremiumModal + }), [hasAiAccess, openPremiumModal]);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
25-54:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove error handling and state management.
The current implementation has several potential issues:
- Loading state might get stuck if the component unmounts during categorization.
- Error handling could be more robust.
- The click handler is quite large and could be extracted for better maintainability.
Consider applying these improvements:
+ const handleCategorize = useCallback(async () => { + if (isCategorizing) return; + + try { + setIsCategorizing(true); + const result = await handleActionCall( + "categorizeSendersAction", + categorizeSendersAction, + ); + + if (isActionError(result)) { + throw new Error(result.error); + } + + return result; + } finally { + setIsCategorizing(false); + } + }, [isCategorizing]); + return ( <> <PremiumTooltip showTooltip={!hasAiAccess} openModal={openPremiumModal}> <Button type="button" loading={isCategorizing} disabled={!hasAiAccess} - onClick={async () => { - if (isCategorizing) return; - toast.promise( - async () => { - setIsCategorizing(true); - const result = await handleActionCall( - "categorizeSendersAction", - categorizeSendersAction, - ); - - if (isActionError(result)) { - setIsCategorizing(false); - throw new Error(result.error); - } - - setIsCategorizing(false); - - return result; - }, + onClick={() => { + toast.promise( + handleCategorize, { loading: "Categorizing senders...", success: () => {Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
apps/web/components/kanban/TaskCard.tsx (4)
21-21: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using a literal type for TaskType.
Since "Task" is the only valid value, we can make this type more strict.
-export type TaskType = "Task"; +export type TaskType = "Task" & { readonly __brand: unique symbol };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export type TaskType = "Task" & { readonly __brand: unique symbol };
47-50: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Memoize the style object to prevent unnecessary re-renders.
The style object is recreated on every render, which could impact performance for many tasks.
+import { useMemo } from "react"; - const style = { + const style = useMemo(() => ({ transition, transform: CSS.Translate.toString(transform), - }; + }), [transition, transform]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.import { useMemo } from "react"; const style = useMemo(() => ({ transition, transform: CSS.Translate.toString(transform), }), [transition, transform]);
52-59: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Move cva variants outside component to prevent recreation.
The variants definition should be moved outside the component to prevent unnecessary recreations on each render.
+const taskCardVariants = cva("", { + variants: { + dragging: { + over: "ring-2 opacity-30", + overlay: "ring-2 ring-primary", + }, + }, +}); export function TaskCard({ task, isOverlay }: TaskCardProps) { - const variants = cva("", { - variants: { - dragging: { - over: "ring-2 opacity-30", - overlay: "ring-2 ring-primary", - }, - }, - });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const taskCardVariants = cva("", { variants: { dragging: { over: "ring-2 opacity-30", overlay: "ring-2 ring-primary", }, }, });
69-71: 💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Email validation and accessibility improvements needed
The EmailCell component lacks proper email validation and relies only on basic string parsing. Additionally, the component needs accessibility enhancements. Specific issues:
- No validation of email format before parsing
- Missing aria attributes for screen readers
- No error handling for malformed email strings
- No type safety for the email format
🔗 Analysis chain
Add validation for task.content and enhance accessibility.
The email content should be validated, and the card could benefit from additional ARIA attributes for better accessibility.
<CardHeader className="space-between relative flex flex-row items-center border-b-2 border-secondary px-3 py-3"> + <div role="article" aria-label={`Email task: ${task.content}`}> <EmailCell emailAddress={task.content} className="mr-auto text-sm" /> + </div>
Let me check the EmailCell component implementation to verify if it has email validation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if EmailCell component has proper email validation rg -A 5 "export.*EmailCell"Length of output: 769
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check EmailCell component implementation cat apps/web/components/EmailCell.tsxLength of output: 560
apps/web/utils/ai/categorize-sender/ai-categorize-single-sender.ts (1)
58-66:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling for the AI API call
The function should handle potential errors from the chat completion API to prevent uncaught exceptions.
Add error handling:
- const aiResponse = await chatCompletionObject({ - userAi: user, - system, - prompt, - schema: categorizeSenderSchema, - userEmail: user.email || "", - usageLabel: "Categorize sender", - }); + try { + const aiResponse = await chatCompletionObject({ + userAi: user, + system, + prompt, + schema: categorizeSenderSchema, + userEmail: user.email || "", + usageLabel: "Categorize sender", + }); + } catch (error) { + logger.error("Error categorizing sender", { error, sender }); + throw new Error("Failed to categorize sender"); + }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
apps/web/components/OnboardingModal.tsx (1)
105-108:
⚠️ Potential issueOptimize useCallback dependencies.
The
setIsOpendependency is unnecessary in the useCallback dependency array as setState functions are stable and don't need to be included.Apply this change:
const onClose = useCallback(() => { setIsOpen(false); - }, [setIsOpen]); + }, []);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const onClose = useCallback(() => { setIsOpen(false); }, []);🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 105-105: This hook specifies more dependencies than necessary: setIsOpen
This dependency can be removed from the list.
(lint/correctness/useExhaustiveDependencies)
apps/web/app/(app)/smart-categories/CreateCategoryButton.tsx (2)
65-65:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove unnecessary template literal.
As flagged by static analysis, the template literal is not needed for a simple string.
- toastSuccess({ description: `Category created!` }); + toastSuccess({ description: "Category created!" });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.toastSuccess({ description: "Category created!" });🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 65-65: Do not use template literals if interpolation and special-character handling are not needed.
Unsafe fix: Replace with string literal
(lint/style/noUnusedTemplateLiteral)
56-70: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling specificity.
Consider providing more specific error messages based on the error type to help users better understand and resolve issues.
- description: `There was an error creating the category. ${result.error}`, + description: result.error || "Failed to create category. Please try again.",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const onSubmit: SubmitHandler<CreateCategoryBody> = useCallback( async (data) => { const result = await createCategoryAction(data); if (isActionError(result)) { toastError({ description: result.error || "Failed to create category. Please try again.", }); } else { toastSuccess({ description: `Category created!` }); closeModal(); } }, [closeModal], );🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 65-65: Do not use template literals if interpolation and special-character handling are not needed.
Unsafe fix: Replace with string literal
(lint/style/noUnusedTemplateLiteral)
apps/web/utils/actions/validation.ts (2)
74-77: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding additional validation constraints
While the basic type validation is good, consider adding constraints to prevent potential edge cases:
- Validate string content in categoryFilters (e.g., non-empty strings)
- Add reasonable limits to the categoryFilters array length
Consider updating the schema like this:
categoryFilterType: z .enum([CategoryFilterType.INCLUDE, CategoryFilterType.EXCLUDE]) .nullish(), - categoryFilters: z.array(z.string()).nullish(), + categoryFilters: z + .array(z.string().min(1).trim()) + .max(100) // adjust limit as needed + .nullish(),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.categoryFilterType: z .enum([CategoryFilterType.INCLUDE, CategoryFilterType.EXCLUDE]) .nullish(), categoryFilters: z .array(z.string().min(1).trim()) .max(100) // adjust limit as needed .nullish(),
95-101: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance category validation constraints
The current schema lacks constraints that could prevent invalid data:
- Name field should have length limits and format validation
- Description field should have a reasonable length limit
Consider updating the schema like this:
export const createCategoryBody = z.object({ - name: z.string(), - description: z.string().nullish(), + name: z.string() + .min(1) + .max(50) + .trim() + .regex(/^[a-zA-Z0-9\s-_]+$/, "Only alphanumeric characters, spaces, hyphens, and underscores allowed"), + description: z.string() + .max(500) + .trim() + .nullish(), });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// categories export const createCategoryBody = z.object({ name: z.string() .min(1) .max(50) .trim() .regex(/^[a-zA-Z0-9\s-_]+$/, "Only alphanumeric characters, spaces, hyphens, and underscores allowed"), description: z.string() .max(500) .trim() .nullish(), }); export type CreateCategoryBody = z.infer<typeof createCategoryBody>;apps/web/__tests__/ai-categorize-senders.test.ts (1)
15-56: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance test coverage and data management.
While the test covers basic categorization, consider these improvements:
- Move test data to a separate fixture file for better maintainability
- Add error cases (e.g., invalid email formats, network failures)
- Test edge cases with different email formats and special characters
Example implementation:
// fixtures/test-senders.ts export const testSenders = { valid: [ { email: "[email protected]", expectedCategory: "newsletter" }, { email: "[email protected]", expectedCategory: "support" }, // ... more test cases ], invalid: [ { email: "invalid.email", expectedError: "Invalid email format" }, // ... more error cases ] }; // Updated test it("should categorize senders using AI", async () => { for (const { email, expectedCategory } of testSenders.valid) { const result = await aiCategorizeSenders({ user, senders: [{ emailAddress: email, snippet: "" }], categories: getEnabledCategories().map((c) => c.label), }); expect(result[0].category).toBe(expectedCategory); } }); it("should handle invalid inputs", async () => { for (const { email, expectedError } of testSenders.invalid) { await expect(aiCategorizeSenders({ user, senders: [{ emailAddress: email, snippet: "" }], categories: getEnabledCategories().map((c) => c.label), })).rejects.toThrow(expectedError); } });apps/web/utils/categories.ts (1)
110-117: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider type safety and performance optimizations.
The function implementation could benefit from these improvements:
- Explicit return type definition
- More semantic parameter naming
- Potential memoization for performance
Consider this enhanced implementation:
type EnabledCategory = { key: SenderCategoryKey; } & SenderCategoryValue; export const getEnabledCategories = (): EnabledCategory[] => { return Object.entries(senderCategory) .filter(([_key, category]) => category.enabled) .map(([key, category]) => ({ key, ...category, })); };If this function is called frequently, consider memoizing the result:
import { useMemo } from 'react'; export const useEnabledCategories = () => { return useMemo(() => getEnabledCategories(), []); };apps/web/utils/ai/group/find-receipts.ts (3)
10-14: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing receipt sender patterns for better accuracy.
While exporting this constant makes sense for reuse, the current patterns could be more comprehensive and robust.
Consider enhancing the patterns:
export const defaultReceiptSenders = [ "invoice+statements", "receipt@", "invoice@", + "billing@", + "payments@", + "orders@", + "no-reply@billing", + "accounting@", ];📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const defaultReceiptSenders = [ "invoice+statements", "receipt@", "invoice@", "billing@", "payments@", "orders@", "no-reply@billing", "accounting@", ];
130-132:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove sender matching accuracy and validation.
The current implementation has potential issues:
- Could produce false positives due to partial string matching
- Lacks input validation
- No case sensitivity handling
Consider this improved implementation:
export function isReceiptSender(sender: string) { + if (!sender || typeof sender !== 'string') return false; + const normalizedSender = sender.toLowerCase(); - return defaultReceiptSenders.some((receipt) => sender.includes(receipt)); + return defaultReceiptSenders.some((receipt) => { + const pattern = receipt.toLowerCase(); + // Match only in email part, not in display name + const emailPart = normalizedSender.split('<').pop()?.split('>')[0] || normalizedSender; + return emailPart.includes(pattern); + }); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export function isReceiptSender(sender: string) { if (!sender || typeof sender !== 'string') return false; const normalizedSender = sender.toLowerCase(); return defaultReceiptSenders.some((receipt) => { const pattern = receipt.toLowerCase(); // Match only in email part, not in display name const emailPart = normalizedSender.split('<').pop()?.split('>')[0] || normalizedSender; return emailPart.includes(pattern); }); }
130-132: 💡 Codebase verification
Add unit tests for the new exported function
The
isReceiptSenderfunction is used in the categorization logic (categorize.ts) but lacks test coverage. Since this function is part of the public API and affects email categorization, it should be thoroughly tested to ensure reliability.
- Create a test file at
apps/web/utils/ai/group/find-receipts.test.ts- Add test cases for:
- Valid receipt senders (true positives)
- Invalid senders (true negatives)
- Edge cases (empty strings, special characters)
- Partial matches
🔗 Analysis chain
Add unit tests for the new exported function.
Since
isReceiptSenderis now part of the public API and used across different files, it should be thoroughly tested.Would you like me to help create unit tests for the new function? I can provide test cases covering:
- Valid receipt senders
- Invalid inputs
- Edge cases
- False positive scenarios
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if tests exist for this file fd "find-receipts.test.ts" --type fLength of output: 35
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check if there are any test files for this directory fd ".test.ts" apps/web/utils/ai/group/ # Also check if this function is used across files rg "isReceiptSender" --type tsLength of output: 333
apps/web/app/api/google/threads/controller.ts (1)
36-46: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify the query construction logic and improve function naming.
The function successfully extracts query logic, but could be improved for clarity and conciseness.
Consider this more streamlined implementation:
- function getQuery() { + function constructGmailSearchQuery() { if (query.q) { return query.q; } else if (query.fromEmail) { return `from:${query.fromEmail}`; } else if (query.type === "archive") { return `-label:${INBOX_LABEL_ID}`; - } else { - return undefined; } + return undefined; }Changes:
- More descriptive function name that indicates its purpose
- Removed redundant else clauses
- Single return for the default case
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.function constructGmailSearchQuery() { if (query.q) { return query.q; } else if (query.fromEmail) { return `from:${query.fromEmail}`; } else if (query.type === "archive") { return `-label:${INBOX_LABEL_ID}`; } return undefined; }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 39-45: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
(lint/style/noUselessElse)
[error] 41-45: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.
(lint/style/noUselessElse)
[error] 43-45: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.
(lint/style/noUselessElse)
apps/web/app/(app)/smart-categories/SetUpCategories.tsx (3)
19-23: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider simplifying state management.
Using a Map for category state adds unnecessary complexity. A plain object would be simpler and more idiomatic in React.
Consider this alternative implementation:
-const [categories, setCategories] = useState<Map<string, boolean>>( - new Map(Object.values(senderCategory).map((c) => [c.label, c.enabled])), -); +const [categories, setCategories] = useState<Record<string, boolean>>(() => + Object.values(senderCategory).reduce( + (acc, c) => ({ ...acc, [c.label]: c.enabled }), + {} + ) +);Benefits:
- More performant (avoids Map conversions)
- Easier to update individual categories
- Uses React's function initialization pattern for complex state
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export function SetUpCategories() { const [categories, setCategories] = useState<Record<string, boolean>>(() => Object.values(senderCategory).reduce( (acc, c) => ({ ...acc, [c.label]: c.enabled }), {} ) ); const [isCreating, setIsCreating] = useState(false);
91-107:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling and user feedback for category creation.
The category creation process lacks error handling and user feedback mechanisms.
Implement proper error handling and user feedback:
<Button loading={isCreating} onClick={async () => { setIsCreating(true); - const selectedCategories = Array.from(categories.entries()) - .filter(([, isSelected]) => isSelected) - .map(([category]) => category); - await createCategoriesAction(selectedCategories); - setIsCreating(false); + try { + const selectedCategories = Array.from(categories.entries()) + .filter(([, isSelected]) => isSelected) + .map(([category]) => category); + + if (selectedCategories.length === 0) { + toast.warning("Please select at least one category"); + return; + } + + await createCategoriesAction(selectedCategories); + toast.success("Categories created successfully"); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Failed to create categories:", error); + toast.error("Failed to create categories. Please try again."); + } finally { + setIsCreating(false); + } }} >📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.<div className="mt-4"> <Button loading={isCreating} onClick={async () => { setIsCreating(true); try { const selectedCategories = Array.from(categories.entries()) .filter(([, isSelected]) => isSelected) .map(([category]) => category); if (selectedCategories.length === 0) { toast.warning("Please select at least one category"); return; } await createCategoriesAction(selectedCategories); toast.success("Categories created successfully"); } catch (error) { console.error("Failed to create categories:", error); toast.error("Failed to create categories. Please try again."); } finally { setIsCreating(false); } }} > <TagsIcon className="mr-2 h-4 w-4" /> Create Categories </Button> </div> </CardContent>
36-89: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize performance and add error handling.
The category selection implementation has several areas for improvement:
- Map iterations could be memoized
- Click handlers create new instances on every render
- Missing error handling for category lookup
Consider these improvements:
+const categoryData = useMemo( + () => Array.from(categories.entries()), + [categories] +); +const handleCategoryToggle = useCallback((category: string, value: boolean) => { + setCategories(prev => new Map(prev).set(category, value)); +}, []); -{Array.from(categories.entries()).map(([category, isSelected]) => { +{categoryData.map(([category, isSelected]) => { const description = Object.values(senderCategory).find( (c) => c.label === category, - )?.description; + )?.description ?? null; return ( // ... - onClick={() => setCategories(new Map(categories.entries()).set(category, false))} + onClick={() => handleCategoryToggle(category, false)} // ... ); })}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
apps/web/components/CommandK.tsx (1)
19-19: 💡 Codebase verification
Import changes are partially consistent but require attention
The codebase shows a mixed state of imports:
archiveEmailshas been consistently moved to@/store/archive-queueacross all files- However,
runAiRulesis still being imported from the old location@/utils/queue/email-actionsin:
- apps/web/components/email-list/EmailList.tsx
- apps/web/app/(app)/automation/BulkRunRules.tsx
This suggests that while the archive-related functionality has been properly moved to the store, the AI rules functionality might also need to be migrated for consistency with the new architecture.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify consistent usage of the new archive-queue import.
The import for
archiveEmailshas been moved from@/utils/queue/email-actionsto@/store/archive-queue, which appears to be part of a broader architectural change.Let's verify that this change has been consistently applied across the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining imports from the old location and confirm usage of new location echo "Checking for old imports..." rg "from ['\"]\@\/utils\/queue\/email-actions['\"]" echo -e "\nChecking usage of new location..." rg "from ['\"]\@\/store\/archive-queue['\"]"Length of output: 489
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a simpler search pattern without escape sequences echo "Checking for old imports..." rg "from ['\"]@/utils/queue/email-actions" echo -e "\nChecking usage of new location..." rg "from ['\"]@/store/archive-queue" # Also search for direct imports without 'from' echo -e "\nChecking for other import patterns of old location..." rg "import.*@/utils/queue/email-actions" echo -e "\nChecking for other import patterns of new location..." rg "import.*@/store/archive-queue"Length of output: 2090
apps/web/package.json (1)
108-108:
⚠️ Potential issue
⚠️ Caution: React 19 RC in productionUsing a release candidate version of React (19.0.0-rc) in production carries risks:
- Potential instability
- Incomplete features
- Breaking changes before final release
Consider staying on React 18 until React 19 is officially released.
Also applies to: 110-110
apps/web/app/(app)/onboarding/OnboardingBulkUnsubscriber.tsx (1)
154-154: 💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent EmailCell prop naming and component definition found
The verification revealed several issues:
- Multiple prop naming patterns are used:
emailAddress,from, andaddress- Two different EmailCell components exist:
apps/web/components/EmailCell.tsx(memo wrapped)apps/web/app/(app)/automation/ExecutedRulesTable.tsxThis needs to be addressed to maintain consistency and prevent confusion:
- Consolidate the two EmailCell components into one
- Standardize the prop naming across all usages
- Update all component instances to use the unified prop interface
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify EmailCell prop name consistency across the codebase.
The change improves code organization by using the dedicated EmailCell component. However, let's verify that the prop name 'emailAddress' is consistently used across other implementations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency in EmailCell usage across the codebase # Test: Search for all EmailCell usages to verify prop naming ast-grep --pattern 'EmailCell emailAddress={$_}' # Also check for any potential variations in prop naming ast-grep --pattern 'EmailCell email={$_}'Length of output: 94
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a more comprehensive search for EmailCell component usage # First find all TypeScript/TSX files containing EmailCell rg -l "EmailCell" --type ts --type tsx # Then look for the actual component usage with context rg "<EmailCell" -A 2 --type ts --type tsx # Also search for potential prop type definitions rg "interface.*EmailCell" --type ts --type tsx rg "type.*EmailCell" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 287
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for EmailCell without file type restrictions since tsx isn't recognized rg -l "EmailCell" # Look for actual component usage with context rg "<EmailCell" -A 2 # Search for prop type definitions rg "interface.*EmailCell" rg "type.*EmailCell" # Also search for the component definition itself rg "export.*EmailCell"Length of output: 2095
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/group/CreateGroupModal.tsx (1)
7-7: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing form validation feedback
The integration of zodResolver for form validation is a good improvement aligned with Next.js 15's focus on type safety. While the technical implementation is correct, consider enhancing the user experience by:
- Adding real-time validation feedback as users type
- Displaying validation rules to users upfront
- Adding aria-invalid attributes for accessibility
Here's how you could enhance the validation feedback:
const { register, handleSubmit, + watch, formState: { errors, isSubmitting }, } = useForm<CreateGroupBody>({ resolver: zodResolver(createGroupBody), + mode: "onChange", // Enable real-time validation }); // Later in the JSX: <Input type="text" name="name" label="Name" placeholder="e.g. Customers, VIP, Web3 Newsletters" registerProps={register("name", { required: true })} error={errors.name} + aria-invalid={errors.name ? "true" : "false"} + helperText="Group name must be unique and between 2-50 characters" />Also applies to: 116-119
apps/web/app/(app)/bulk-unsubscribe/hooks.ts (2)
385-394: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider similar promise simplification
The promise wrapper pattern could be simplified similar to the archiveAll function suggestion.
Consider this alternative implementation:
if (data?.length) { - await new Promise<void>((resolve, reject) => { - deleteEmails( - data.map((t) => t.id).filter(isDefined), - () => { - onFinish(); - resolve(); - }, - reject, - ); - }); + await deleteEmails(data.map((t) => t.id).filter(isDefined)); + onFinish(); }Note: This suggestion assumes
deleteEmailscan be modified to return a Promise directly. If not, the current implementation is appropriate.Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
308-326: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider simplifying the promise chain
While the implementation is functionally correct, it could be simplified using async/await for better readability and maintenance.
Consider this alternative implementation:
async function archiveAll(name: string, onFinish: () => void) { toast.promise( async () => { - const threadsArchived = await new Promise<number>((resolve, reject) => { - addToArchiveSenderQueue( - name, - undefined, - (totalThreads) => { - onFinish(); - resolve(totalThreads); - }, - reject, - ); - }); + const threadsArchived = await addToArchiveSenderQueue(name); + onFinish(); return threadsArchived; }, { loading: `Archiving all emails from ${name}`, success: (data) => data ? `Archived ${data} emails from ${name}` : `No emails to archive from ${name}`, error: `There was an error archiving the emails from ${name} :(`, }, ); }Note: This suggestion assumes
addToArchiveSenderQueuecan be modified to return a Promise directly. If not, the current implementation is appropriate.Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
apps/web/components/email-list/EmailList.tsx (1)
275-294: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider extracting the Promise wrapping pattern
The Promise wrapping pattern is repeated in multiple places (onArchive, onTrashBulk). Consider extracting it into a utility function to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.
Example implementation:
const wrapWithPromise = <T>( action: ( resolve: (value: T) => void, reject: (error: any) => void ) => void ): Promise<T> => { return new Promise((resolve, reject) => action(resolve, reject)); }; // Usage in onArchive: const onArchive = useCallback( (thread: Thread) => { const threadIds = [thread.id]; toast.promise( () => wrapWithPromise((resolve, reject) => archiveEmails(threadIds, undefined, (threadId) => { refetch([threadId]); resolve(); }, reject ) ), { loading: "Archiving...", success: "Archived!", error: "There was an error archiving the email :(" } ); }, [refetch] );apps/web/utils/actions/ai-rule.ts (1)
119-119: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:
Category filters functionality lacks test coverage
The test files show no explicit test cases for the category filters functionality that was added to the
testAiActionfunction. While there are comprehensive tests for other rule-related features, the category filters inclusion needs test coverage to ensure proper functionality.
- Add test cases in
apps/web/__tests__/ai-choose-rule.test.tsto verify that category filters are properly included and used when testing rules- Consider adding test cases that verify the behavior of rules with and without category filters
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify test coverage for category filters.
The addition of
categoryFiltersto the test function ensures consistency with the production code. Please ensure that test cases are updated to cover the category filtering functionality.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for test coverage of categoryFilters # Search for test files related to rules fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts rule # Search for categoryFilters in test files rg -l 'categoryFilters' $(fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts)Length of output: 479
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the content of test files to see if they cover category filters functionality # Check content of AI rule-related test files echo "=== Content of ai-choose-rule.test.ts ===" rg -C 5 "categoryFilters|testAiAction" apps/web/__tests__/ai-choose-rule.test.ts echo -e "\n=== Content of ai-diff-rules.test.ts ===" rg -C 5 "categoryFilters|testAiAction" apps/web/__tests__/ai-diff-rules.test.ts echo -e "\n=== Content of ai-prompt-to-rules.test.ts ===" rg -C 5 "categoryFilters|testAiAction" apps/web/__tests__/ai-prompt-to-rules.test.ts # Also check the implementation file to understand the test context echo -e "\n=== Content of ai-rule.ts around testAiAction ===" rg -C 10 "testAiAction" apps/web/utils/actions/ai-rule.tsLength of output: 1301
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for test files that might test the rules functionality and category filters # Search for test files that contain both rules and category filters testing echo "=== Checking test files for rules and category filters testing ===" rg -C 10 "test|describe|it.*rules.*category" apps/web/__tests__/*.test.ts # Check for any test setup or mock data related to category filters echo -e "\n=== Checking for test setup with category filters ===" rg -C 5 "mock.*rules|test.*rules" apps/web/__tests__/*.test.ts | rg -C 5 "category" # Check the actual implementation of testRulesOnMessage to understand what's being tested echo -e "\n=== Implementation context ===" rg -C 10 "testRulesOnMessage" apps/web/utils/actions/ai-rule.tsLength of output: 21872
apps/web/app/api/user/categorize/senders/find-senders.ts (3)
71-73: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid using
any; specify explicit types for better type safetyUsing
anybypasses type checking and can lead to runtime errors. Define specific types or interfaces to enhance type safety.Consider defining an interface for the error structure:
interface GoogleApiError { errors: { message: string; reason: string; }[]; }Then refactor the code to use this interface:
- Array.isArray((error as any).errors) && - (error as any).errors.some( - (e: any) => + Array.isArray((error as GoogleApiError).errors) && + (error as GoogleApiError).errors.some( + (e) =>🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 71-71: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 72-72: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 73-73: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
46-46:
⚠️ Potential issueUse string literal instead of unnecessary template literal
The query string does not require interpolation. Replace the template literal with a simple string literal for clarity.
Apply this diff:
- q: `-in:sent`, + q: '-in:sent',📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.q: '-in:sent',🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 46-46: Do not use template literals if interpolation and special-character handling are not needed.
Unsafe fix: Replace with string literal
(lint/style/noUnusedTemplateLiteral)
23-26:
⚠️ Potential issuePrefer
for...ofloop overforEachfor better performanceUsing a
for...ofloop can improve readability and performance when iterating over entries. Consider replacingforEachwith afor...ofloop.Apply this diff to make the change:
- Object.entries(senders).forEach(([sender, messages]) => { - const existingMessages = allSenders.get(sender) ?? []; - allSenders.set(sender, [...existingMessages, ...messages]); - }); + for (const [sender, messages] of Object.entries(senders)) { + const existingMessages = allSenders.get(sender) ?? []; + allSenders.set(sender, [...existingMessages, ...messages]); + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.for (const [sender, messages] of Object.entries(senders)) { const existingMessages = allSenders.get(sender) ?? []; allSenders.set(sender, [...existingMessages, ...messages]); }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 23-26: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.
forEach may lead to performance issues when working with large arrays. When combined with functions like filter or map, this causes multiple iterations over the same type.
(lint/complexity/noForEach)
apps/web/app/api/user/categorize/senders/uncategorized/route.ts (2)
71-71:
⚠️ Potential issueUse
Number.parseIntinstead ofparseIntfor consistencyES2015 moved some globals into the
Numbernamespace for consistency. It's recommended to useNumber.parseIntto parse strings into integers.Apply this diff to update the code:
-const offset = parseInt(url.searchParams.get("offset") || "0"); +const offset = Number.parseInt(url.searchParams.get("offset") || "0");📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const offset = Number.parseInt(url.searchParams.get("offset") || "0");🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 71-71: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.
ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)
64-68: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Return appropriate HTTP status codes in error responses
Currently, error responses are returned with a default 200 OK status code. For better API design and to help clients handle errors correctly, consider returning appropriate HTTP status codes such as 401 Unauthorized or 500 Internal Server Error.
Apply this diff to include HTTP status codes in your error responses:
-if (!user?.email) return NextResponse.json({ error: "Not authenticated" }); +if (!user?.email) + return NextResponse.json({ error: "Not authenticated" }, { status: 401 }); if (error) return NextResponse.json({ error }); -if (!gmail) return NextResponse.json({ error: "Could not load Gmail" }); +if (!gmail) + return NextResponse.json({ error: "Could not load Gmail" }, { status: 500 }); -if (!session?.accessToken) +if (!session?.accessToken) return NextResponse.json({ error: "No access token" }); + return NextResponse.json({ error: "No access token" }, { status: 401 });Adjust the status codes (
401,500, etc.) as appropriate for each error condition to accurately reflect the nature of the error.Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
apps/web/components/kanban/multipleContainersKeyboardPreset.ts (1)
29-84: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor
forEachloop tofor...ofloop for improved performanceUsing a
for...ofloop instead offorEachcan enhance performance, especially with large arrays, by avoiding the overhead of the callback function. When refactoring, replacereturnstatements inside theforEachcallback withcontinuestatements to maintain the same loop behavior.Apply this diff to refactor the loop:
- droppableContainers.getEnabled().forEach((entry) => { - if (!entry || entry?.disabled) { - return; - } - // rest of the loop code - }); + for (const entry of droppableContainers.getEnabled()) { + if (!entry || entry.disabled) { + continue; + } + // rest of the loop code + }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 29-84: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.
forEach may lead to performance issues when working with large arrays. When combined with functions like filter or map, this causes multiple iterations over the same type.
(lint/complexity/noForEach)
apps/web/store/ai-categorize-sender-queue.ts (3)
71-72: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use a single template literal instead of string concatenation
Combining the strings into a single template literal enhances readability and is more idiomatic in modern JavaScript.
Apply this diff to refactor the code:
- `Queue: aiCategorizeSender. Processing ${sender}` + - (attemptCount > 1 ? ` (attempt ${attemptCount})` : ""), + `Queue: aiCategorizeSender. Processing ${sender}${attemptCount > 1 ? ` (attempt ${attemptCount})` : ""}`,📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.`Queue: aiCategorizeSender. Processing ${sender}${attemptCount > 1 ? ` (attempt ${attemptCount})` : ""}`,🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 71-72: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
23-27: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Prefer using a for...of loop instead of Array.forEach
Using a
for...ofloop can improve performance and readability, especially when dealing with large arrays. It also avoids potential issues associated withforEach.Apply this diff to refactor the code:
- pushIds.forEach((id) => { - if (!newQueue.has(id)) { - newQueue.set(id, { status: "pending" }); - } - }); + for (const id of pushIds) { + if (!newQueue.has(id)) { + newQueue.set(id, { status: "pending" }); + } + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.for (const id of pushIds) { if (!newQueue.has(id)) { newQueue.set(id, { status: "pending" }); } }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 23-27: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.
forEach may lead to performance issues when working with large arrays. When combined with functions like filter or map, this causes multiple iterations over the same type.
(lint/complexity/noForEach)
68-92:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle failures after maximum retry attempts to update the sender's status
If all retry attempts fail, the sender's status remains "processing" in the queue, which could cause confusion or hinder further processing. Consider updating the status to "failed" to reflect the unsuccessful attempts.
Apply this diff to handle failed attempts:
await pRetry( async (attemptCount) => { // existing code }, { retries: 3 }, + ).catch((error) => { + jotaiStore.set(aiCategorizeSenderQueueAtom, (prev) => { + const newQueue = new Map(prev); + newQueue.set(sender, { status: "failed" }); + return newQueue; + }); + console.error( + `Queue: aiCategorizeSender. Failed to process ${sender} after ${attemptCount} attempts: ${error.message}` + ); );Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 71-72: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
apps/web/store/archive-sender-queue.ts (1)
4-4:
⚠️ Potential issueUse
import typefor type-only importsThe
GetThreadsResponseis only used as a type. Usingimport typeensures it is removed during compilation and avoids loading unnecessary modules.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-import { GetThreadsResponse } from "@/app/api/google/threads/basic/route"; +import type { GetThreadsResponse } from "@/app/api/google/threads/basic/route";📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.import type { GetThreadsResponse } from "@/app/api/google/threads/basic/route";🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 4-4: All these imports are only used as types.
Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the compilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.(lint/style/useImportType)
apps/web/components/kanban/BoardColumn.tsx (1)
82-85:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure Proper Forwarding of Attributes and Listeners in
<Button>ComponentWhen spreading
attributesandlistenersinto the<Button>component (lines 82-83), ensure that the component correctly forwards these props to the underlying DOM element. Some UI libraries' button components may not pass all props to the native<button>element, which could interfere with the drag-and-drop functionality.Consider wrapping the drag handle in a native
<div>or<span>element to ensure all attributes and listeners are applied correctly:<Button variant={"ghost"} - {...attributes} - {...listeners} className="relative -ml-2 h-auto cursor-grab p-1 text-primary/50" > + <span {...attributes} {...listeners}> <span className="sr-only">{`Move column: ${column.title}`}</span> <GripVertical /> + </span> </Button>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.variant={"ghost"} className="relative -ml-2 h-auto cursor-grab p-1 text-primary/50" > <span {...attributes} {...listeners}> <span className="sr-only">{`Move column: ${column.title}`}</span> <GripVertical /> </span>apps/web/utils/ai/categorize-sender/ai-categorize-senders.ts (4)
16-18: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using an enum for
categorywith additional validationWhile using
z.string()forcategoryallows flexibility, it may be beneficial to use an enum and handle new categories explicitly.Define an enum for known categories and validate against it, while capturing unknown categories separately.
const knownCategories = ["CategoryA", "CategoryB", "RequestMoreInformation"] as const; const categoryEnum = z.enum(knownCategories); const categorizeSendersSchema = z.object({ senders: z.array( z.object({ rationale: z.string().describe("Keep it short."), sender: z.string(), category: categoryEnum.or(z.string()), // Allow unknown categories }) ), });Then, handle unknown categories in your processing logic.
66-66:
⚠️ Potential issueCorrect the typo in the prompt instructions
There's a typo in the prompt instructions on line 66~. The word "their" should be "they're".
Apply this diff to fix the typo:
-5. For individual senders, you'll want to "RequestMoreInformation". For example, [email protected], we don't know if their a customer, or sending us marketing, or something else. +5. For individual senders, you'll want to "RequestMoreInformation". For example, [email protected], we don't know if they're a customer, or sending us marketing, or something else.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.5. For individual senders, you'll want to "RequestMoreInformation". For example, [email protected], we don't know if they're a customer, or sending us marketing, or something else.
86-91:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure case-insensitive category matching
The current category matching on line 86~ is case-sensitive, which may lead to valid categories being missed if there's a case mismatch.
Consider normalizing both category names to lower case to ensure accurate matching.
Apply this diff to make the category comparison case-insensitive:
-if (!categories.find((c) => c.name === r.category)) { +if (!categories.find((c) => c.name.toLowerCase() === r.category.toLowerCase())) {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (!categories.find((c) => c.name.toLowerCase() === r.category.toLowerCase())) { return { category: undefined, sender: r.sender, }; }
107-109:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove sender matching logic for robustness
Using
includesto match senders may result in incorrect matches if one sender's email address contains another's. This can lead to inaccurate mapping of AI responses to original senders.Replace
includeswith an exact match or a more reliable matching method.Apply this diff to enhance the matching logic:
-const sender = originalSenders.find((s) => s.includes(r.sender)); +const sender = originalSenders.find((s) => s === r.sender || s.toLowerCase() === r.sender.toLowerCase());Alternatively, if the AI response may contain partial email addresses, consider normalizing and comparing email addresses appropriately.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const sender = originalSenders.find((s) => s === r.sender || s.toLowerCase() === r.sender.toLowerCase()); if (!sender) return;apps/web/app/(app)/smart-categories/page.tsx (1)
31-33: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider redirecting unauthenticated users instead of throwing an error
Currently, the code throws an error when the user is not authenticated. To enhance user experience, consider redirecting the user to the login page or displaying an informative message.
apps/web/app/(app)/smart-categories/Uncategorized.tsx (4)
115-117: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add confirmation before stopping AI categorization
Stopping the AI categorization process might be unintended. Consider adding a confirmation prompt to prevent accidental clicks.
Implement a confirmation dialog:
onClick={() => { + if (confirm("Are you sure you want to stop AI categorization?")) { stopAiCategorizeSenderQueue(); + } }}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
38-44:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle API errors in the
useSendershookCurrently, the
useSWRInfinitehook does not handle potential errors from the API. It's recommended to handle theerrorstate to provide feedback to the user in case of API failures.You can modify the hook to include error handling:
const { data, size, setSize, isLoading } = - useSWRInfinite<UncategorizedSendersResponse>(getKey, { + useSWRInfinite<UncategorizedSendersResponse>(getKey, fetcherFunction, { revalidateOnFocus: false, revalidateFirstPage: false, persistSize: true, revalidateOnMount: true, }); + const isError = !!error;And return the
errorstate:return { data: allSenders, loadMore, isLoading, hasMore, + isError, };Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
92-105:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling when starting AI categorization
In the onClick handler for the "Categorize all with AI" button, consider handling potential errors from
pushToAiCategorizeSenderQueueAtomand providing feedback to the user.You can update the handler as follows:
onClick={async () => { if (!senderAddresses.length) { toastError({ description: "No senders to categorize" }); return; } + try { pushToAiCategorizeSenderQueueAtom(senderAddresses); + } catch (error) { + toastError({ description: "Failed to start AI categorization. Please try again." }); + } }}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
84-149:
⚠️ Potential issueDisplay an error message when data fails to load
In the
Uncategorizedcomponent, consider displaying an error message to the user when data fails to load by checking theisErrorstate from theuseSendershook.You can update the component to handle the error:
const { data: senderAddresses, loadMore, isLoading, hasMore, isError } = useSenders(); ... <ClientOnly> - {senders.length ? ( + {isError ? ( + <SectionDescription className="p-4"> + Failed to load senders. Please try again later. + </SectionDescription> + ) : senders.length ? ( <> <SendersTable senders={senders} categories={categories} /> {hasMore && (Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
apps/web/store/archive-queue.ts (4)
121-127:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove unnecessary 'async' keyword from 'deleteEmails' function
The
deleteEmailsfunction is declared asasyncbut does not contain anyawaitexpressions. Removing theasynckeyword can prevent unintended behavior and improve performance.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-export const deleteEmails = async ( +export const deleteEmails = ( threadIds: string[], onSuccess: (threadId: string) => void, onError?: (threadId: string) => void, ) => { addThreadsToQueue({ actionType: "delete", threadIds, onSuccess, onError }); };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const deleteEmails = ( threadIds: string[], onSuccess: (threadId: string) => void, onError?: (threadId: string) => void, ) => { addThreadsToQueue({ actionType: "delete", threadIds, onSuccess, onError }); };
113-119:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove unnecessary 'async' keyword from 'markReadThreads' function
The
markReadThreadsfunction is declared asasyncbut does not contain anyawaitexpressions. Removing theasynckeyword can prevent unintended behavior and improve performance.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-export const markReadThreads = async ( +export const markReadThreads = ( threadIds: string[], onSuccess: (threadId: string) => void, onError?: (threadId: string) => void, ) => { addThreadsToQueue({ actionType: "markRead", threadIds, onSuccess, onError }); };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const markReadThreads = ( threadIds: string[], onSuccess: (threadId: string) => void, onError?: (threadId: string) => void, ) => { addThreadsToQueue({ actionType: "markRead", threadIds, onSuccess, onError }); };
162-163:
⚠️ Potential issueUse a single template literal instead of string concatenation
The log statement concatenates template literals using the
+operator. It's recommended to use a single template literal for better readability and to follow modern JavaScript practices.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-console.log( - `Queue: ${actionType}. Processing ${threadId}` + - (attemptCount > 1 ? ` (attempt ${attemptCount})` : ""), -); +console.log( + `Queue: ${actionType}. Processing ${threadId}${ + attemptCount > 1 ? ` (attempt ${attemptCount})` : "" + }`, +);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 162-163: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
98-103:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove unnecessary 'async' keyword from 'archiveEmails' function
The
archiveEmailsfunction is declared asasyncbut does not contain anyawaitexpressions. Removing theasynckeyword can prevent unintended behavior and improve performance.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-export const archiveEmails = async ( +export const archiveEmails = ( threadIds: string[], labelId: string | undefined, onSuccess: (threadId: string) => void, onError?: (threadId: string) => void, ) => { addThreadsToQueue({ actionType: "archive", threadIds, labelId, onSuccess, onError, }); };Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
apps/web/components/MultiSelectFilter.tsx (2)
156-161:
⚠️ Potential issueSynchronize
selectedValueswith changes inoptionsCurrently,
selectedValuesis initialized based onoptionsonly on the initial render. Ifoptionschange over time,selectedValueswill not update accordingly. To ensureselectedValuesstays in sync withoptions, utilizeReact.useEffectto update the state wheneveroptionschange.Apply this change to synchronize
selectedValueswithoptions:export function useMultiSelectFilter(options: string[]) { - const [selectedValues, setSelectedValues] = React.useState<Set<string>>( - new Set(options), - ); + const [selectedValues, setSelectedValues] = React.useState<Set<string>>(new Set()); + + React.useEffect(() => { + setSelectedValues(new Set(options)); + }, [options]); return { selectedValues, setSelectedValues }; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export function useMultiSelectFilter(options: string[]) { const [selectedValues, setSelectedValues] = React.useState<Set<string>>(new Set()); React.useEffect(() => { setSelectedValues(new Set(options)); }, [options]); return { selectedValues, setSelectedValues }; }
24-34:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove unused generic type parameters
TDataandTValueThe generic type parameters
TDataandTValueinMultiSelectFilterPropsandMultiSelectFilterare not utilized within the code. Removing these unused types can simplify the component and reduce potential confusion.Apply this diff to remove the unused generic type parameters:
-interface MultiSelectFilterProps<TData, TValue> { +interface MultiSelectFilterProps { title?: string; options: { label: string; value: string; icon?: React.ComponentType<{ className?: string }>; }[]; selectedValues: Set<string>; setSelectedValues: (values: Set<string>) => void; maxDisplayedValues?: number; } -export function MultiSelectFilter<TData, TValue>({ +export function MultiSelectFilter({ title, options, selectedValues, setSelectedValues, maxDisplayedValues, }: MultiSelectFilterProps) {Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
apps/web/utils/ai/choose-rule/run-rules.ts (1)
121-166:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle the case when
senderis not found to avoid unintended rule exclusionIn the
getApplicableRulesfunction, if thesenderis not found in the database (i.e.,senderremainsnullafterprisma.newsletter.findUnique), thensender?.categoryIdisundefined. This could lead toisIncludedbeingfalse, and rules that should be applicable may be incorrectly excluded. Consider explicitly handling the case whensenderisnullto ensure that rules are correctly applied.Apply this diff to handle the
nullsender case:if (!sender) { sender = await prisma.newsletter.findUnique({ where: { email_userId: { email: message.headers.from, userId } }, select: { categoryId: true }, }); + if (!sender) { + // If sender is not found, decide how to handle this case + // For example, you might skip category filtering or assign a default category + // return null; // Uncomment this line if you want to exclude the rule + } } const isIncluded = rule.categoryFilters.some( (c) => c.id === sender?.categoryId, );Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
apps/web/prisma/schema.prisma (1)
315-318: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Specify 'onDelete' behavior for 'category' relation in 'Newsletter' model
To ensure consistent behavior when a related
Categoryis deleted, consider specifying theonDeleteaction for thecategoryrelation in theNewslettermodel. This helps prevent potential orphaned records or unintended behavior.Apply the following change to specify the desired delete behavior:
userId String user User @relation(fields: [userId], references: [id], onDelete: Cascade) categoryId String? - category Category? @relation(fields: [categoryId], references: [id]) + category Category? @relation(fields: [categoryId], references: [id], onDelete: SetNull)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.userId String user User @relation(fields: [userId], references: [id], onDelete: Cascade) categoryId String? category Category? @relation(fields: [categoryId], references: [id], onDelete: SetNull)apps/web/components/kanban/KanbanBoard.tsx (4)
166-184: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unnecessary
elseclause to improve readabilityThe
elseclause after areturnstatement is unnecessary and can be omitted. This simplifies the code and makes it more readable.Apply this diff to streamline the code:
if ( active.data.current?.type === "Column" && over.data.current?.type === "Column" ) { const overColumnIdx = columnsId.findIndex((id) => id === over.id); return `Column ${active.data.current.column.title} was moved over ${ over.data.current.column.title } at position ${overColumnIdx + 1} of ${columnsId.length}`; - } else if ( + } + if ( active.data.current?.type === "Task" && over.data.current?.type === "Task" ) { const { tasksInColumn, taskPosition, column } = getDraggingTaskData( over.id, over.data.current.task.columnId, ); if (over.data.current.task.columnId !== pickedUpTaskColumn.current) { return `Task ${ active.data.current.task.content } was moved over column ${column?.title} in position ${ taskPosition + 1 } of ${tasksInColumn.length}`; } return `Task was moved over position ${taskPosition + 1} of ${ tasksInColumn.length } in column ${column?.title}`; }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 166-184: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
(lint/style/noUselessElse)
202-218: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Omit unnecessary
elseclause after early returnAfter an early
return, theelseclause is redundant. Removing it reduces nesting and enhances the clarity of the code.Apply this diff to simplify the structure:
if ( active.data.current?.type === "Column" && over.data.current?.type === "Column" ) { const overColumnPosition = columnsId.findIndex((id) => id === over.id); return `Column ${ active.data.current.column.title } was dropped into position ${overColumnPosition + 1} of ${ columnsId.length }`; - } else if ( + } + if ( active.data.current?.type === "Task" && over.data.current?.type === "Task" ) { const { tasksInColumn, taskPosition, column } = getDraggingTaskData( over.id, over.data.current.task.columnId, ); if (over.data.current.task.columnId !== pickedUpTaskColumn.current) { return `Task was dropped into column ${column?.title} in position ${ taskPosition + 1 } of ${tasksInColumn.length}`; } return `Task was dropped into position ${taskPosition + 1} of ${ tasksInColumn.length } in column ${column?.title}`; }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 202-218: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
(lint/style/noUselessElse)
142-153: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify code by removing unnecessary
elseclauseSince the previous
ifblock returns early with areturnstatement, the subsequentelse ifcan be converted to anifstatement to reduce nesting and enhance readability.Apply this diff to simplify the code:
if (active.data.current?.type === "Column") { const startColumnIdx = columnsId.findIndex((id) => id === active.id); const startColumn = columns[startColumnIdx]; return `Picked up Column ${startColumn?.title} at position: ${ startColumnIdx + 1 } of ${columnsId.length}`; - } else if (active.data.current?.type === "Task") { + } + if (active.data.current?.type === "Task") { pickedUpTaskColumn.current = active.data.current.task.columnId; const { tasksInColumn, taskPosition, column } = getDraggingTaskData( active.id, pickedUpTaskColumn.current, // TODO: Handle potential null value ); return `Picked up Task ${ active.data.current.task.content } at position: ${taskPosition + 1} of ${ tasksInColumn.length } in column ${column?.title}`; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (active.data.current?.type === "Column") { const startColumnIdx = columnsId.findIndex((id) => id === active.id); const startColumn = columns[startColumnIdx]; return `Picked up Column ${startColumn?.title} at position: ${ startColumnIdx + 1 } of ${columnsId.length}`; } if (active.data.current?.type === "Task") { pickedUpTaskColumn.current = active.data.current.task.columnId; const { tasksInColumn, taskPosition, column } = getDraggingTaskData( active.id, pickedUpTaskColumn.current, // TODO: Handle potential null value ); return `Picked up Task ${ active.data.current.task.content } at position: ${taskPosition + 1} of ${ tasksInColumn.length } in column ${column?.title}`; }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 142-153: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
(lint/style/noUselessElse)
[error] 146-146: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
146-146:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle potential null value instead of using non-null assertion
Using the non-null assertion operator (
!) onpickedUpTaskColumn.currentcan lead to runtime errors if it'snullorundefined. It's safer to handle the potentialnullvalue explicitly.Consider checking for a
nullvalue before usingpickedUpTaskColumn.current:- pickedUpTaskColumn.current!, // TODO: Handle potential null value + pickedUpTaskColumn.current ?? '', // Provide a default value or handle accordinglyWould you like assistance in implementing this change, or should I open a new GitHub issue to track this task?
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 146-146: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
apps/web/components/GroupedTable.tsx (6)
84-84:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd explicit 'type' attribute to the button element
The
buttonelement lacks an explicittypeattribute. In React, the default type for abuttonis"submit", which may cause unintended form submissions when the button is inside a form. Specifytype="button"to prevent this behavior.Apply this diff to add the
typeattribute:<button + type="button" onClick={row.getToggleExpandedHandler()} className="p-2" >📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.<button type="button" onClick={row.getToggleExpandedHandler()} className="p-2">🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 84-84: Provide an explicit type prop for the button element.
The default type of a button is submit, which causes the submission of a form when placed inside a
formelement. This is likely not the behaviour that you want inside a React application.
Allowed button types are: submit, button or reset(lint/a11y/useButtonType)
64-68:
⚠️ Potential issueUse 'for...of' loop instead of 'forEach' for better performance
The use of
categories.forEachmay lead to performance issues, especially with large arrays. It's recommended to use afor...ofloop for better performance and readability.Apply this diff to replace
forEachwith afor...ofloop:-categories.forEach((category) => { +for (const category of categories) { if (!grouped[category.name]) { grouped[category.name] = []; } -}); +}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.for (const category of categories) { if (!grouped[category.name]) { grouped[category.name] = []; } }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 64-68: Prefer for...of instead of forEach.
forEach may lead to performance issues when working with large arrays. When combined with functions like filter or map, this causes multiple iterations over the same type.
(lint/complexity/noForEach)
168-172: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize asynchronous operations by running them in parallel
Currently, the
onArchiveAllfunction awaits each asynchronous call sequentially, which can be inefficient. To improve performance, consider running the promises in parallel usingPromise.allSettledorPromise.all.Apply this diff to update the function:
const onArchiveAll = async () => { - for (const sender of senders) { - await addToArchiveSenderQueue(sender.address); - } + await Promise.all( + senders.map((sender) => addToArchiveSenderQueue(sender.address)) + ); };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const onArchiveAll = async () => { await Promise.all( senders.map((sender) => addToArchiveSenderQueue(sender.address)) ); };
463-465: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify code by removing unnecessary 'else' clause
The
elseclause can be omitted since the precedingifblock contains areturnstatement. This simplifies the code and improves readability.Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary
elseclause:} else { return <span className="text-gray-500">Archived</span>; } + return <span className="text-gray-500">Archived</span>;After removal:
} + return <span className="text-gray-500">Archived</span>;Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 463-465: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
(lint/style/noUselessElse)
332-332:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid using 'any' type; specify a more precise type
Casting to
anydisables type checking and should be avoided. Specify a more precise type forcell.column.columnDef.metato maintain type safety.Consider defining an interface for the
metaproperty and updating the code as follows:- width: (cell.column.columnDef.meta as any)?.size || "auto", + interface ColumnMeta { + size?: string; + } + + width: (cell.column.columnDef.meta as ColumnMeta)?.size || "auto",Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 332-332: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
381-391:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd null checks to prevent possible runtime errors
Accessing
thread.messages[0]without checking if it exists could lead to runtime errors if themessagesarray is empty. Add a check to ensurethread.messages[0]is defined before accessing its properties.Update the code to include a safety check:
{data.threads.map((thread) => ( <TableRow key={thread.id} className="bg-muted/50"> <TableCell /> <TableCell> <Link href={getGmailUrl(thread.id, sender)} target="_blank" className="hover:underline" > - {thread.messages[0].headers.subject} + {thread.messages[0]?.headers.subject || "No Subject"} </Link> </TableCell>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.<TableRow key={thread.id} className="bg-muted/50"> <TableCell /> <TableCell> <Link href={getGmailUrl(thread.id, sender)} target="_blank" className="hover:underline" > {thread.messages[0]?.headers.subject || "No Subject"} </Link> </TableCell>apps/web/utils/actions/categorize.ts (4)
173-173:
⚠️ Potential issueEliminate non-null assertions to prevent potential runtime errors.
The non-null assertion operator (
!) is used at lines 173, 212, and 270. Relying on it can cause runtime exceptions if the value is actuallynullorundefined.Refactor the code to safely handle possibly undefined values:
At line 173:
- userId: u?.id!, + if (!u?.id) return { error: "User ID not found" }; + userId: u.id,At lines 212 and 270:
- session.accessToken!, + if (!session.accessToken) return { error: "Access token not found" }; + session.accessToken,Also applies to: 212-212, 270-270
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 173-173: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
377-377:
⚠️ Potential issueCorrect the conditional check for personal email domains.
There's a typo in the condition
sender.includes(\@${domain}>`); the>` character seems unintended and may cause incorrect matches.Update the condition to properly check the sender's domain:
- if (personalEmailDomains.some((domain) => sender.includes(`@${domain}>`))) + if (personalEmailDomains.some((domain) => sender.includes(`@${domain}`)))📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (personalEmailDomains.some((domain) => sender.includes(`@${domain}`)))
291-293: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unnecessary
elseclause afterreturn.Since the
ifblock at line 290 contains areturnstatement, the subsequentelseclause is redundant and can be simplified.Apply this diff to streamline the code:
} else { console.error(`No AI result for sender: ${senderAddress}`); } + console.error(`No AI result for sender: ${senderAddress}`);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 291-293: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
(lint/style/noUselessElse)
65-65:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid using non-null assertion on
u.email.Using the non-null assertion operator (
!) onu.emailcan lead to runtime errors ifundefined. It's safer to check ifConsider updating the code as follows:
- { email: u.email! }, + if (!u.email) return { error: "User email not found" }; + { email: u.email },Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/web/utils/middleware.ts (2)
Line range hint
22-23: LGTM with a suggestion for error contextThe error handling implementation correctly adapts to the optional params. The error categorization and responses are well-structured.
Consider enhancing error context by including the HTTP method:
- console.error(`Error for url: ${req.url}:`); + console.error(`Error for ${req.method} ${req.url}:`);
Line range hint
119-127: Enhance PostHog error logging contextThe error logging implementation is solid, but could benefit from additional context to help with debugging.
Consider adding more context to the PostHog error logging:
} catch (error) { - console.error("Error logging to PostHog:", error); + console.error("Error logging to PostHog:", { + error, + event: eventName, + url: req.url, + userEmail: session?.user.email + }); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
apps/unsubscriber/package.json(1 hunks)apps/web/package.json(6 hunks)apps/web/utils/middleware.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- apps/unsubscriber/package.json
- apps/web/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/web/utils/middleware.ts (2)
Line range hint 1-127: Verify Next.js 15 middleware compatibility
While the changes align with Next.js 15's parameter handling, we should verify complete middleware compatibility with the new version.
Let's check for any Next.js 15 specific middleware patterns:
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the findings from the shell script execution to verify Next.js 15 middleware compatibility:
Next.js middleware implementation is fully compatible
The codebase's middleware implementation follows Next.js 15's best practices:
- Uses the correct imports from
next/serverforNextRequestandNextResponse - Properly handles request parameters through the standardized
optionsobject - Follows the recommended error handling patterns with proper response structures
- No deprecated middleware APIs or patterns are being used
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for other middleware files that might need similar updates
fd -e ts -e js middleware
# Check for Next.js specific imports that might need updates
rg "from 'next/|from \"next/" -l | while read -r file; do
echo "=== Checking Next.js imports in $file ==="
rg "from 'next/|from \"next/" "$file"
done
Length of output: 45327
17-19: Breaking Change: Verify NextHandler usage across the codebase
The NextHandler type signature has been modified to make the params optional. While this provides more flexibility, it's a breaking change that could affect existing handlers that assume params is always defined.
Let's verify the impact:
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional scripts to specifically check for NextHandler usage and implementations:
This will help us understand:
- Where the NextHandler type is being used
- How it's being implemented across the codebase
- Whether existing handlers rely on the params being defined
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
Optional params change is safe and aligned with Next.js 15 usage
The change to make params optional in NextHandler type is safe because:
- All current implementations of
withErrorpass theparamsargument correctly to the handler - The handlers consistently handle the optional nature of
paramsin their implementations - This change aligns with Next.js 15's parameter handling patterns where route handlers may or may not receive params
The verification shows that:
- The
NextHandlertype is only defined and used within middleware.ts - The
withErrorfunction is the only consumer of this type and it properly forwards the params - All route handlers using
withErrorare already written to handle cases where params might be undefined - No breaking changes will occur as the type change matches the actual runtime behavior
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all handler implementations that might be affected
rg -l "NextHandler|withError\(" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== Checking $file ==="
# Show the context of handler implementations
rg -B 2 -A 5 "NextHandler|withError\(" "$file"
done
Length of output: 45327
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for NextHandler type usage and implementations
echo "=== Searching for NextHandler type usage ==="
rg -A 5 -B 2 "NextHandler" --type ts
echo -e "\n=== Searching for withError usage (which might use NextHandler) ==="
rg -A 5 -B 2 "withError" --type ts
Length of output: 76643
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
apps/web/app/api/user/group/[groupId]/messages/route.ts (1)
Line range hint
7-12: Consider adding type safety for route params.To improve type safety and prevent potential runtime errors, consider adding type definitions for the route parameters.
+ type RouteParams = { + params: Promise<{ + groupId: string; + }>; + }; - export const GET = withError(async (_request, { params }) => { + export const GET = withError(async (_request, { params }: RouteParams) => {apps/web/app/api/user/group/[groupId]/items/route.ts (1)
32-33: Consider adding type annotations for Next.js 15 params.While the async params handling is correct for Next.js 15, we can improve type safety by explicitly typing the params object.
- const { groupId } = await params; + const { groupId } = await params as { groupId: string };apps/web/sanity/schemaTypes/authorType.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Consider importing types from @sanity/icons.To improve type safety, we should import the proper icon type definitions.
Add the type import:
-import { UserIcon } from "@sanity/icons"; +import { UserIcon, type IconComponent } from "@sanity/icons";Then use it in the schema:
icon: UserIcon as IconComponent🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 8-8: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
apps/web/app/api/google/threads/[id]/route.ts (1)
29-29: Consider adding explicit error handling for params parsing.The change correctly handles Next.js 15's async params. However, while the
withErrormiddleware provides general error handling, consider adding explicit error handling for params parsing to provide a more specific error response.- const query = threadQuery.parse(await params); + try { + const query = threadQuery.parse(await params); + } catch (error) { + return NextResponse.json( + { error: "Invalid thread ID parameter" }, + { status: 400 } + ); + }apps/web/app/api/user/rules/[id]/example/route.ts (1)
35-35: Consider enhancing the error message specificity.The error message could be more descriptive to aid in debugging.
- if (!id) return NextResponse.json({ error: "Missing rule id" }); + if (!id) return NextResponse.json({ error: "Missing required parameter: rule id" });packages/resend/src/send.tsx (3)
1-1: Remove unused import.The
ReactNodetype is imported but not used anywhere in the file.-import type { ReactNode } from "react";
Line range hint
56-93: Add proper async/await and error handling.Both functions have several issues that should be addressed:
- Missing
awaitonsendEmailcalls- No error handling despite being async functions
- Inconsistent logging between functions
Apply these improvements:
export const sendStatsEmail = async ({ to, test, emailProps, }: { to: string; test?: boolean; emailProps: StatsUpdateEmailProps; }) => { - sendEmail({ - to, - subject: "Your weekly email stats", - react: <StatsUpdateEmail {...emailProps} />, - test, - tags: [ - { - name: "category", - value: "stats", - }, - ], - }); + try { + console.log("sending stats email to", to); + await sendEmail({ + to, + subject: "Your weekly email stats", + react: <StatsUpdateEmail {...emailProps} />, + test, + tags: [ + { + name: "category", + value: "stats", + }, + ], + }); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Failed to send stats email:", error); + throw error; + } }; export const sendSummaryEmail = async ({ to, test, emailProps, }: { to: string; test?: boolean; emailProps: SummaryEmailProps; }) => { console.log("sending summary email to", to); - sendEmail({ - to, - subject: "Your weekly email summary", - react: <SummaryEmail {...emailProps} />, - test, - tags: [ - { - name: "category", - value: "activity-update", - }, - ], - }); + try { + await sendEmail({ + to, + subject: "Your weekly email summary", + react: <SummaryEmail {...emailProps} />, + test, + tags: [ + { + name: "category", + value: "activity-update", + }, + ], + }); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Failed to send summary email:", error); + throw error; + } };
Line range hint
8-24: Consider adding resilience patterns for email handling.The email sending implementation could benefit from additional resilience patterns:
- Rate limiting to prevent hitting Resend API limits
- Retry mechanism for handling temporary failures
- Queue system for managing bulk email operations
These patterns would help ensure reliable email delivery, especially as the application scales.
Would you like me to provide implementation examples for any of these patterns?
apps/web/utils/middleware.ts (1)
Line range hint
28-121: Consider enhancing error handling with standardized error codes and retry informationThe error handling is comprehensive, but there are opportunities for improvement:
- Rate limit responses (429) should include a Retry-After header
- Error messages could be centralized for easier maintenance
Example enhancement for rate limit handling:
if (isGmailRateLimitExceededError(error)) { console.warn(`Gmail rate limit exceeded for url: ${req.url}`); await logToPosthog(req, "Gmail Rate Limit Exceeded"); return NextResponse.json( { error: `You have exceeded the Gmail rate limit. Please try again later. Error from Gmail: "${(error as any)?.errors?.[0]?.message}"`, isKnownError: true, }, - { status: 429 }, + { + status: 429, + headers: { + 'Retry-After': '60', // Set appropriate retry delay + }, + }, ); }Consider creating an error catalog:
// errorCatalog.ts export const ERROR_MESSAGES = { GMAIL_RATE_LIMIT: (details?: string) => `You have exceeded the Gmail rate limit. Please try again later. ${details ? `Error from Gmail: "${details}"` : ''}`, GMAIL_QUOTA_EXCEEDED: "You have exceeded the Gmail quota. Please try again later.", // ... other messages } as const;🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 17-17: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 23-23: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
apps/web/package.json (1)
21-23: New drag-and-drop functionality addedThe addition of @dnd-kit packages suggests new drag-and-drop features. Ensure:
- Accessibility requirements are met
- Touch device support is implemented
- Proper error boundaries are in place
apps/web/components/kanban/KanbanBoard.tsx (1)
97-103: Consider adding prop validation and default values.While the props are well-typed, consider adding runtime validation for the props and potentially default values to handle edge cases gracefully.
+import { z } from "zod"; +const propsSchema = z.object({ + categories: z.array(z.custom<Column>()).min(1), + items: z.array(z.custom<Task>()) +}); export function KanbanBoard({ categories, items, }: { categories: Column[]; items: Task[]; -}) { +}) { + const validatedProps = propsSchema.parse({ categories, items });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
apps/web/app/api/google/threads/[id]/route.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/app/api/user/group/[groupId]/items/route.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/app/api/user/group/[groupId]/messages/route.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/app/api/user/group/[groupId]/rules/route.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/app/api/user/rules/[id]/example/route.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/components/kanban/KanbanBoard.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/package.json(6 hunks)apps/web/sanity/schemaTypes/authorType.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/sanity/schemaTypes/blockContentType.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/sanity/schemaTypes/categoryType.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/sanity/schemaTypes/postType.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/utils/middleware.ts(1 hunks)packages/resend/src/send.tsx(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
apps/web/components/kanban/KanbanBoard.tsx
[error] 142-153: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
(lint/style/noUselessElse)
[error] 146-146: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 166-184: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
(lint/style/noUselessElse)
[error] 202-218: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
(lint/style/noUselessElse)
apps/web/sanity/schemaTypes/authorType.ts
[error] 8-8: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
apps/web/sanity/schemaTypes/blockContentType.ts
[error] 65-66: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
apps/web/sanity/schemaTypes/categoryType.ts
[error] 8-8: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
apps/web/sanity/schemaTypes/postType.ts
[error] 8-8: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
apps/web/utils/middleware.ts
[error] 17-17: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 23-23: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
packages/resend/src/send.tsx
[error] 35-35: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
🔇 Additional comments (17)
apps/web/sanity/schemaTypes/categoryType.ts (1)
Line range hint 1-26: Verify schema compatibility with Next.js 15.
Since this change is part of the Next.js 15 upgrade and similar changes were made across multiple schema files, we should verify if this is the recommended approach for Sanity schemas in Next.js 15.
Let's check for any similar patterns in the codebase:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar type assertions in schema files
rg "as any" "apps/web/sanity/schemaTypes/"
# Look for Sanity schema examples in the docs
fd README.md | xargs rg -l "sanity.*schema.*type"🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 8-8: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
apps/web/app/api/user/group/[groupId]/messages/route.ts (1)
12-12: LGTM! Correct implementation of Next.js 15 params handling.
The change correctly implements the new async params handling introduced in Next.js 15, where dynamic route parameters are now accessed through a Promise.
apps/web/app/api/user/group/[groupId]/items/route.ts (1)
37-37: LGTM! Clean usage of destructured groupId.
The change to use the destructured groupId variable makes the code cleaner and more consistent.
apps/web/app/api/user/group/[groupId]/rules/route.ts (2)
40-40: LGTM! Consistent usage of destructured groupId.
The destructured groupId is properly passed to the database query function.
37-38: LGTM! Proper handling of async params in Next.js 15.
The change to await params before destructuring aligns with Next.js 15's new behavior where route parameters are now provided as promises.
Let's verify this pattern is consistently applied across other route handlers:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the params handling pattern in Next.js route handlers:
The async params handling pattern is consistently applied across route handlers
The codebase shows consistent usage of async params across multiple route handlers:
apps/web/app/api/user/group/[groupId]/rules/route.ts:
const { groupId } = await params;apps/web/app/api/user/rules/[id]/example/route.ts:
const { id } = await params;apps/web/app/api/user/group/[groupId]/messages/route.ts:
const { groupId } = await params;apps/web/app/api/v1/group/[groupId]/emails/route.ts:
const params = await props.params;
const { groupId } = params;The pattern is consistently implemented across all dynamic route handlers, properly handling Next.js 15's promise-based params.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other route handlers to ensure consistent params handling
rg -t typescript --glob 'apps/web/app/**/route.ts' -A 2 'params\)'
Length of output: 103
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for route handlers with params usage, without file type filtering
rg --glob 'apps/web/app/**/route.ts' -A 2 'params\)'
Length of output: 274
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Alternative search to find params usage in route files
fd 'route.ts$' apps/web/app -x grep -A 2 'params)'
Length of output: 134
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for async route handlers
rg --glob 'apps/web/app/**/route.ts' 'export async function'
Length of output: 228
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's look for more specific params usage patterns
rg --glob 'apps/web/app/**/route.ts' -B 2 -A 4 'const.*params|await params'
Length of output: 6590
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for route parameter destructuring patterns
rg --glob 'apps/web/app/**/route.ts' -B 2 -A 4 '\{.*\}.*=.*params'
Length of output: 3070
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get content of the files that use route parameters
fd 'route.ts$' apps/web/app -x cat
Length of output: 105026
apps/web/sanity/schemaTypes/authorType.ts (1)
8-8:
Avoid using explicit any type assertion.
The use of any bypasses TypeScript's type checking and could hide potential type incompatibilities. Consider using proper type definitions from Sanity instead.
Try this alternative approach:
- icon: UserIcon as any,
+ icon: UserIcon as React.ComponentType,If you're encountering type compatibility issues with Next.js 15, we should address them properly rather than bypassing the type system.
Let's check if this is a widespread pattern:
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 8-8: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
apps/web/app/api/user/rules/[id]/example/route.ts (2)
37-37: LGTM: Consistent parameter passing.
The update maintains type safety while adapting to the new params structure.
34-35: LGTM: Proper async params handling for Next.js 15.
The changes correctly handle the new async nature of route parameters in Next.js 15.
Let's verify the middleware compatibility with async params:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now verify the middleware compatibility. The withError middleware implementation in apps/web/utils/middleware.ts shows:
export function withError<
TContext extends Record<string, any>,
TResponse = void,
>(handler: NextHandler<TContext, TResponse>): NextHandler<TContext, TResponse> {
return async (req, params) => {
try {
return await handler(req, params);
} catch (error) {
// Error handling logic
}
};
}The middleware properly handles async params by:
- Taking an async handler function as input
- Returning an async function that awaits the handler
- Properly passing through the params object to the handler
LGTM: The withError middleware correctly handles async route parameters.
The middleware implementation is compatible with Next.js 15's async route params as it:
- Accepts and passes through the params object without modification
- Uses async/await throughout the middleware chain
- Maintains proper error handling for async operations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if withError middleware properly handles async params
rg -A 5 "export const withError"
Length of output: 34
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try searching for withError middleware using different approaches
# 1. Search for withError function declaration using ast-grep
ast-grep --pattern 'const withError = $_'
# 2. Search for withError in the entire codebase with more context
rg -g '!{dist,build}/*' -A 10 'withError'
# 3. Search for files that might contain the middleware
fd withError
Length of output: 97038
apps/web/sanity/schemaTypes/postType.ts (1)
8-8: Verify type compatibility issues across schema files.
Since similar as any assertions were added to multiple schema files (authorType, blockContentType, categoryType), this suggests a systematic type compatibility issue with Next.js 15.
Let's check for similar patterns across schema files:
Consider creating a shared type definition or interface for schema icons to maintain consistency and type safety across all schema files.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the icon imports and type definitions to better understand the type compatibility issue.
Type assertions are consistent and necessary for Sanity schema definitions
The as any type assertions are consistently applied across all schema files when using Sanity icons from @sanity/icons. This pattern appears to be a deliberate solution for type compatibility between Sanity's schema definition system and the icon components, rather than a type safety issue:
- All schema files import icons from the official
@sanity/iconspackage - The type assertions are used uniformly across all schema files (postType, authorType, categoryType, blockContentType)
- The schema files follow Sanity's standard structure using
SchemaTypeDefinitionfrom the core package
No action is needed as this is a valid pattern for Sanity schema definitions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for type assertions in schema files
# Expected: Find all schema files with similar icon type assertions
# Search for schema files with icon type assertions
echo "Searching for icon type assertions in schema files..."
rg -l "icon:.*as any" "apps/web/sanity/schemaTypes/"
# Search for all icon usages to compare
echo -e "\nSearching for all icon usages..."
rg "icon:.*Icon" "apps/web/sanity/schemaTypes/"
Length of output: 758
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check icon imports and type definitions
echo "Checking icon imports..."
rg "import.*Icon.*from" "apps/web/sanity/schemaTypes/"
echo -e "\nChecking type definitions..."
rg "type|interface" "apps/web/sanity/schemaTypes/"
# Check if there's a shared schema type definition
echo -e "\nChecking for shared schema definitions..."
fd "schema" apps/web/sanity/ --type f --exec rg "export.*type|interface" {}
Length of output: 3727
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 8-8: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
apps/web/sanity/schemaTypes/blockContentType.ts (1)
65-65: Consider using a more specific type instead of any.
While this type assertion might be necessary for Sanity.io compatibility with Next.js 15, using any bypasses TypeScript's type checking and could hide potential issues. Consider investigating if there's a more specific type available from Sanity.io's type definitions.
Let's verify if there's a more specific type we can use:
Would you like me to help investigate the proper types from Sanity.io's type definitions?
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 65-66: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
packages/resend/src/send.tsx (1)
35-35:
Avoid using 'any' type for better type safety.
While the any type might work, it bypasses TypeScript's type checking and could hide potential issues. Consider using a more specific type.
- react: react as any,
+ react: react as ReactElement<unknown>,Let's check if this type casting is required for Next.js 15 compatibility:
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 35-35: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
apps/web/utils/middleware.ts (1)
17-25: Verify all NextHandler implementations are updated
Since this is a breaking change in the middleware type signature, we should ensure all implementations are updated.
✅ Verification successful
All route handlers are correctly using the updated NextHandler type
The verification shows that all route handlers are using the withError middleware consistently, which wraps the NextHandler type. The implementation in apps/web/utils/middleware.ts is the source of the type definition, and all route handlers are importing and using it correctly through the withError wrapper.
No changes are needed in the implementations as they are already aligned with the type signature change.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all potential NextHandler implementations
echo "Searching for files that might need updates:"
rg -l "NextHandler|withError" --type typescript
# Look for potential usage patterns that might need updating
echo -e "\nChecking for old parameter patterns that need updating:"
rg -A 2 "params: \{" --type typescript
Length of output: 386
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all potential NextHandler implementations and withError usage
echo "Searching for files that might need updates:"
rg -l "NextHandler|withError"
# Look for potential usage patterns that might need updating
echo -e "\nChecking for old parameter patterns:"
rg -A 2 "params: \{"
# Search for handler function implementations
echo -e "\nChecking handler implementations:"
ast-grep --pattern 'export async function $HANDLER($REQ, $CONTEXT) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 60592
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for NextHandler implementations in route handlers
echo "Searching for route handlers using NextHandler:"
rg -A 2 "NextHandler<.*>" apps/web/app/api
# Search for withError usage in route handlers
echo -e "\nSearching for withError usage:"
rg -A 2 "withError\(" apps/web/app/api
Length of output: 15942
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 17-17: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
[error] 23-23: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
apps/web/package.json (4)
6-6: Verify Turbo mode compatibility
The dev script now uses --turbo flag and updated turbo package. While this can improve development performance, ensure:
- All local development features work correctly with Turbo
- Hot reload functions as expected
- Environment variables are properly loaded
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential turbo mode incompatibilities
echo "Checking for custom server configurations..."
rg "server\.js|server\.ts"
echo "Checking for middleware usage..."
rg "middleware\.(ts|js)"Also applies to: 150-150
138-139: Type safety with React 19 alpha types
Using alpha versions of React types (@types/[email protected]) could lead to:
- Inconsistent type definitions
- Breaking changes in future updates
- IDE type checking issues
Consider pinning these versions and monitoring for stable releases.
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential type issues
echo "Checking for strict TypeScript configuration..."
rg '"strict":|"noEmit":|"skipLibCheck":' tsconfig.json
echo "Checking for type assertions that might break..."
rg "as any|as unknown"Also applies to: 159-160
80-81: ESLint configuration update required
The upgrade to [email protected] requires verification of ESLint rules compatibility:
- Check for deprecated rules
- Ensure custom rules still work
- Verify no new conflicting rules
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the ESLint configuration to make a more informed decision.
Let me check one more thing to verify the workspace ESLint configuration that's being extended.
ESLint upgrade appears safe to proceed
The verification shows:
- Simple ESLint setup with standard recommended configs and Prettier
- No complex custom rules that could conflict with the upgrade
- Limited ESLint disable directives, mostly for environment variables and Next.js specific rules
- No app-specific ESLint config that could cause compatibility issues
The upgrade from the current ESLint setup to [email protected] should work without issues as the codebase follows standard patterns and has minimal customization.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for ESLint configuration
echo "Checking for custom ESLint configurations..."
rg '"rules":' .eslintrc*
echo "Checking for ESLint disable comments that might need review..."
rg "eslint-disable"
Length of output: 1135
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check ESLint configuration file content
echo "Checking ESLint configuration content..."
cat .eslintrc.js
# Check for ESLint extends configurations
echo -e "\nChecking for ESLint extends..."
rg '"extends":' .eslintrc*
# Check package.json for any ESLint related scripts
echo -e "\nChecking for ESLint related scripts..."
cat apps/web/package.json | grep -A 5 -B 5 "eslint"
Length of output: 1387
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check workspace ESLint config
echo "Checking workspace ESLint configuration..."
cat packages/eslint-config/library.js
# Check for any ESLint config files in the web app
echo -e "\nChecking for ESLint config in web app..."
fd -t f -e js -e json -e yaml -e yml .eslintrc apps/web/
Length of output: 899
93-94: Verify Next.js 15 upgrade compatibility
The upgrade to Next.js 15 (from 14.2.15) is a major version bump that may introduce breaking changes. Ensure all Next.js-specific features in your codebase are compatible with version 15.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now provide a comprehensive assessment of the Next.js 15 upgrade compatibility:
Next.js 15 upgrade appears compatible with current codebase
The codebase is well-structured for Next.js 15 compatibility:
- Uses the App Router pattern (
apps/web/app/*) - Properly implements Next.js features like middleware, server components, and client components
- No usage of deprecated APIs or patterns
- Configuration is modern and uses TypeScript (
next.config.ts)
Key areas verified:
- ✓ App Router implementation
- ✓ Modern API routes using Route Handlers
- ✓ Proper usage of Next.js imports
- ✓ No deprecated
getStaticProps/getServerSidePropsusage - ✓ TypeScript configuration
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for potentially affected Next.js features
echo "Checking for App Router usage..."
rg "app/.*?/page\.(ts|tsx|js|jsx)$"
echo "Checking for deprecated API routes..."
rg "pages/api/.*?\.(ts|tsx|js|jsx)$"
echo "Checking for usage of getStaticProps/getServerSideProps..."
rg "export.*?(getStaticProps|getServerSideProps)"
Length of output: 4318
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for Next.js app router and pages router structure
echo "Checking App Router structure..."
fd -t d "app" --max-depth 1
echo "Checking Pages Router structure..."
fd -t d "pages" --max-depth 1
echo "Checking Next.js specific features..."
# Check for Next.js specific imports and features
rg "from 'next|from \"next" -A 1
# Check for middleware usage
echo "Checking middleware..."
fd "middleware" --type f
# Check for next.config.js
echo "Checking Next.js config..."
fd "next.config" --type f
Length of output: 38107
apps/web/components/kanban/KanbanBoard.tsx (1)
97-368: Verify performance with large datasets.
While the implementation is solid, the component might benefit from performance optimization when handling large numbers of tasks:
- Consider memoizing task filtering
- Verify render performance with many columns/tasks
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 142-153: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
(lint/style/noUselessElse)
[error] 146-146: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
[error] 166-184: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
(lint/style/noUselessElse)
[error] 202-218: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
(lint/style/noUselessElse)
| @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ export const categoryType = defineType({ | |||
| name: "category", | |||
| title: "Category", | |||
| type: "document", | |||
| icon: TagIcon, | |||
| icon: TagIcon as any, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Use proper type definitions from Sanity instead of as any
Based on the package versions found (@sanity/icons@^3.4.0 and sanity@^3.62.3), the correct approach is to use proper type definitions:
- icon: TagIcon as any,
+ icon: TagIcon,The as any type assertion is unnecessary as the icons from @sanity/icons are already properly typed for use in Sanity schema definitions. This is evident from the usage of defineType and other Sanity v3 APIs throughout the schema files.
Similar changes should be applied to:
apps/web/sanity/schemaTypes/postType.tsapps/web/sanity/schemaTypes/blockContentType.tsapps/web/sanity/schemaTypes/authorType.ts
🔗 Analysis chain
Avoid using as any type assertion.
The use of as any bypasses TypeScript's type checking and could hide potential type mismatches. This change appears to be addressing type compatibility issues with the Next.js 15 upgrade, but there might be better alternatives.
Consider these alternatives:
- icon: TagIcon as any,
+ icon: defineConfig({ icon: TagIcon }),Or if you're using a newer version of Sanity:
- icon: TagIcon as any,
+ icon: TagIcon satisfies IconComponent,Let's verify the Sanity version and its type requirements:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Sanity version and type definitions
grep -r "\"@sanity/" package.json
Length of output: 380
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the package.json files in the monorepo for Sanity dependencies
fd package.json --exec grep -l "@sanity"
# Also check for specific Sanity imports in schema files
rg "from '@sanity" apps/web/sanity/
# And look for schema type definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'import { $_ } from "@sanity/icons"'
# Check for defineConfig usage
rg "defineConfig" apps/web/sanity/
Length of output: 556
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the contents of web's package.json for Sanity versions
cat apps/web/package.json
# Check for any Sanity-related type definitions or configurations
rg -A 5 "defineType|SchemaType" apps/web/sanity/
# Look for any existing type assertions in the schema files
rg -A 2 "import.*@sanity/icons.*" apps/web/sanity/schemaTypes/
Length of output: 9537
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 8-8: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
| @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ export const postType = defineType({ | |||
| name: "post", | |||
| title: "Post", | |||
| type: "document", | |||
| icon: DocumentTextIcon, | |||
| icon: DocumentTextIcon as any, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid using any type assertion.
Using as any bypasses TypeScript's type checking and can hide potential type errors. Consider using a more specific type assertion or proper type definitions.
Here are better alternatives:
- icon: DocumentTextIcon as any,
+ icon: DocumentTextIcon as React.ComponentType,Or define a proper type interface:
import { ComponentType } from 'react'
interface SanitySchemaIcon extends ComponentType {
// Add any specific properties required by Sanity
}
// Then use it
icon: DocumentTextIcon as SanitySchemaIcon,🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 8-8: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
| export function withError< | ||
| TContext extends Record<string, any>, | ||
| TResponse = void, | ||
| >(handler: NextHandler<TContext, TResponse>): NextHandler<TContext, TResponse> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Maintain consistent type constraints
The generic type constraints should match the recommended changes to the NextHandler type.
Update the withError function signature to match:
-export function withError<
- TContext extends Record<string, any>,
+export function withError<
+ TContext extends Record<string, string | number | boolean>,
TResponse = void,
>(handler: NextHandler<TContext, TResponse>): NextHandler<TContext, TResponse> {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export function withError< | |
| TContext extends Record<string, any>, | |
| TResponse = void, | |
| >(handler: NextHandler<TContext, TResponse>): NextHandler<TContext, TResponse> { | |
| export function withError< | |
| TContext extends Record<string, string | number | boolean>, | |
| TResponse = void, | |
| >(handler: NextHandler<TContext, TResponse>): NextHandler<TContext, TResponse> { |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 23-23: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
| type NextHandler<TContext extends Record<string, any>, TResponse = void> = ( | ||
| req: NextRequest, | ||
| { params }: { params: Record<string, string | undefined> }, | ||
| ) => Promise<NextResponse | StreamingTextResponse>; | ||
| context: { params: Promise<TContext> }, | ||
| ) => Promise<NextResponse<TResponse> | StreamingTextResponse>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type safety by constraining generic type parameters
While the transition to Promise-based params aligns with Next.js 15, we should avoid using Record<string, any> as it reduces type safety.
Consider using a more specific base type:
-type NextHandler<TContext extends Record<string, any>, TResponse = void> = (
+type NextHandler<TContext extends Record<string, string | number | boolean>, TResponse = void> = (
req: NextRequest,
context: { params: Promise<TContext> },
) => Promise<NextResponse<TResponse> | StreamingTextResponse>;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| type NextHandler<TContext extends Record<string, any>, TResponse = void> = ( | |
| req: NextRequest, | |
| { params }: { params: Record<string, string | undefined> }, | |
| ) => Promise<NextResponse | StreamingTextResponse>; | |
| context: { params: Promise<TContext> }, | |
| ) => Promise<NextResponse<TResponse> | StreamingTextResponse>; | |
| type NextHandler<TContext extends Record<string, string | number | boolean>, TResponse = void> = ( | |
| req: NextRequest, | |
| context: { params: Promise<TContext> }, | |
| ) => Promise<NextResponse<TResponse> | StreamingTextResponse>; |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 17-17: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.
(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)
apps/web/package.json
Outdated
| "posthog-node": "^4.2.1", | ||
| "prettier": "^3.3.3", | ||
| "prettier-plugin-tailwindcss": "^0.6.8", | ||
| "react": "18.3.1", | ||
| "react": "19.0.0-rc-65a56d0e-20241020", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using a release candidate version of React (19.0.0-rc) in production is risky. Consider these concerns:
- Potential instability and bugs
- Breaking changes between RC and final release
- Limited community support and documentation
Recommend either:
- Staying on stable React 18 until React 19 final release
- Thoroughly testing all components with React 19 RC if proceeding
Also applies to: 110-110
| const [columns, setColumns] = useState<Column[]>(categories); | ||
| const pickedUpTaskColumn = useRef<string | null>(null); | ||
| const columnsId = useMemo(() => columns.map((col) => col.id), [columns]); | ||
|
|
||
| const [tasks, setTasks] = useState<Task[]>(items); | ||
|
|
||
| const [activeColumn, setActiveColumn] = useState<Column | null>(null); | ||
|
|
||
| const [activeTask, setActiveTask] = useState<Task | null>(null); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using useReducer for complex state management.
The component manages multiple related states (columns, tasks, activeColumn, activeTask) that are often updated together. Using useReducer would centralize the state logic and make it easier to maintain.
type State = {
columns: Column[];
tasks: Task[];
activeColumn: Column | null;
activeTask: Task | null;
};
type Action =
| { type: 'SET_ACTIVE_COLUMN'; payload: Column | null }
| { type: 'SET_ACTIVE_TASK'; payload: Task | null }
| { type: 'MOVE_COLUMN'; payload: { sourceIndex: number; destIndex: number } }
| { type: 'MOVE_TASK'; payload: { sourceIndex: number; destIndex: number; columnId: string } };
function reducer(state: State, action: Action): State {
switch (action.type) {
case 'SET_ACTIVE_COLUMN':
return { ...state, activeColumn: action.payload };
// ... other cases
}
}| {"document" in window ? ( | ||
| createPortal( | ||
| <DragOverlay> | ||
| {activeColumn && ( | ||
| <BoardColumn | ||
| isOverlay | ||
| column={activeColumn} | ||
| tasks={tasks.filter( | ||
| (task) => task.columnId === activeColumn.id, | ||
| )} | ||
| /> | ||
| )} | ||
| {activeTask && <TaskCard task={activeTask} isOverlay />} | ||
| </DragOverlay>, | ||
| document.body, | ||
| ) | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <></> | ||
| )} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Extract portal logic into a custom hook.
The document check and portal creation logic could be abstracted into a reusable hook for better maintainability.
function usePortal(children: React.ReactNode) {
if (typeof window === 'undefined') return null;
return createPortal(children, document.body);
}
// Usage:
const overlay = usePortal(
<DragOverlay>
{activeColumn && (
<BoardColumn
isOverlay
column={activeColumn}
tasks={tasks.filter((task) => task.columnId === activeColumn.id)}
/>
)}
{activeTask && <TaskCard task={activeTask} isOverlay />}
</DragOverlay>
);
return overlay ?? <></>;| pickedUpTaskColumn.current!, // TODO: ! | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove non-null assertion.
Replace the non-null assertion with proper type checking to maintain type safety.
-pickedUpTaskColumn.current!, // TODO: !
+pickedUpTaskColumn.current ?? '', // or handle the null case explicitlyCommittable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 146-146: Forbidden non-null assertion.
(lint/style/noNonNullAssertion)
| if (isActiveATask && isOverATask) { | ||
| setTasks((tasks) => { | ||
| const activeIndex = tasks.findIndex((t) => t.id === activeId); | ||
| const overIndex = tasks.findIndex((t) => t.id === overId); | ||
| const activeTask = tasks[activeIndex]; | ||
| const overTask = tasks[overIndex]; | ||
| if ( | ||
| activeTask && | ||
| overTask && | ||
| activeTask.columnId !== overTask.columnId | ||
| ) { | ||
| activeTask.columnId = overTask.columnId; | ||
| return arrayMove(tasks, activeIndex, overIndex - 1); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return arrayMove(tasks, activeIndex, overIndex); | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize task movement logic.
The task movement logic in onDragOver could be simplified and made more robust:
- Extract the index finding logic into a reusable function
- Add validation for array bounds
+const findTaskIndex = (tasks: Task[], id: UniqueIdentifier) => {
+ const index = tasks.findIndex((t) => t.id === id);
+ if (index === -1) throw new Error(`Task ${id} not found`);
+ return index;
+};
if (isActiveATask && isOverATask) {
setTasks((tasks) => {
- const activeIndex = tasks.findIndex((t) => t.id === activeId);
- const overIndex = tasks.findIndex((t) => t.id === overId);
+ const activeIndex = findTaskIndex(tasks, activeId);
+ const overIndex = findTaskIndex(tasks, overId);
const activeTask = tasks[activeIndex];
const overTask = tasks[overIndex];Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
turbo.json (2)
40-40: Document the API_KEY_SALT environment variableThe new
API_KEY_SALTenvironment variable has been added to the build configuration. Please ensure this is documented in:
- Environment variable documentation
- Local development setup guide
- Deployment documentation
Let's verify if documentation exists:
#!/bin/bash # Check for documentation files echo "Checking for documentation of API_KEY_SALT..." rg "API_KEY_SALT" -A 5 "README.md" "docs/" ".env.example"
Line range hint
1-99: Consider organizing environment variables by categoryThe environment variables list is growing quite long. Consider organizing them into logical groups using comments for better maintainability, such as:
- Authentication variables
- Payment/Billing variables
- API Keys
- Feature flags
- Analytics/Monitoring
Example structure:
"env": [ + # Core Configuration "NODE_ENV", "DATABASE_URL", "DIRECT_URL", + # Authentication "NEXTAUTH_SECRET", "GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID", ...
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
turbo.json(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
turbo.json (1)
40-40: Verify the authentication configuration with Next.js 15
The addition of API_KEY_SALT and removal of NEXTAUTH_URL might affect the authentication setup. While adding salt for API keys improves security, we should ensure the authentication still works as expected.
Let's verify the authentication configuration:
✅ Verification successful
API_KEY_SALT addition is valid, NEXTAUTH_URL removal is safe
The changes in turbo.json are correct and safe:
API_KEY_SALTis properly used for secure API key hashing inapi-key.tsNEXTAUTH_URLremoval is safe as Next.js 15 no longer requires it for auth configuration- The auth setup uses the new Next.js 15 Auth.js integration pattern as seen in
[...nextauth]/auth.ts
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if NEXTAUTH_URL is still used in the codebase
echo "Checking for NEXTAUTH_URL usage..."
rg "NEXTAUTH_URL" -l
# Check for any auth-related configuration files
echo "Checking for auth configuration files..."
fd -e ts -e js -e json -i "auth|next.*config"
Length of output: 371
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of auth configuration files
echo "Content of [...nextauth]/auth.ts:"
cat "apps/web/app/api/auth/[...nextauth]/auth.ts"
echo -e "\nContent of utils/auth.ts:"
cat "apps/web/utils/auth.ts"
# Check if API_KEY_SALT is used in the codebase
echo -e "\nChecking API_KEY_SALT usage:"
rg "API_KEY_SALT" -l
# Check next.config.ts for any auth-related env vars
echo -e "\nContent of next.config.ts:"
cat "apps/web/next.config.ts"
Length of output: 15428
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of api-key.ts to understand API_KEY_SALT usage
echo "Content of apps/web/utils/api-key.ts:"
cat "apps/web/utils/api-key.ts"
# Check env.ts for API_KEY_SALT configuration
echo -e "\nContent of apps/web/env.ts:"
cat "apps/web/env.ts"
Length of output: 8392
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/web/utils/middleware.ts (1)
Line range hint
22-96: Improve type safety in error handlingThe error handling code uses type casting to
anywhich reduces type safety. Consider defining proper error types:interface GmailError { errors?: Array<{ message: string }>; } interface OpenAIError { error?: { message: string }; }Then update the error handling:
-error: `You have exceeded the Gmail rate limit. Please try again later. Error from Gmail: "${(error as any)?.errors?.[0]?.message}"`, +error: `You have exceeded the Gmail rate limit. Please try again later. Error from Gmail: "${(error as GmailError)?.errors?.[0]?.message}"`, -error: `OpenAI error: ${(error as any)?.error?.message}`, +error: `OpenAI error: ${(error as OpenAIError)?.error?.message}`,apps/web/package.json (1)
Line range hint
21-23: New Drag-and-Drop Dependencies AddedThe addition of @dnd-kit packages suggests new drag-and-drop functionality. Ensure these are being used consistently across the application and that accessibility features are properly implemented.
Consider creating a shared drag-and-drop context or hooks to maintain consistent behavior across components.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
apps/web/app/(app)/simple/page.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/app/api/user/complete-registration/route.ts(3 hunks)apps/web/components/kanban/KanbanBoard.tsx(2 hunks)apps/web/package.json(7 hunks)apps/web/providers/PostHogProvider.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/utils/middleware.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- apps/web/app/(app)/simple/page.tsx
- apps/web/app/api/user/complete-registration/route.ts
- apps/web/components/kanban/KanbanBoard.tsx
- apps/web/providers/PostHogProvider.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (7)
apps/web/utils/middleware.ts (1)
17-20: Add Promise rejection handling for params
While the transition to Promise-based params aligns with Next.js 15, ensure proper error handling for Promise rejections in implementations.
Let's verify how params Promise is handled across the codebase:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for NextHandler implementations to verify Promise handling
ast-grep --pattern 'async function $_($_, { params }: { params: Promise<$_> })'Note: The previous review comment about improving type safety by replacing Record<string, any> with more specific types is still valid.
apps/web/package.json (6)
67-69: Analytics and Monitoring Updates
The updates to Vercel analytics packages and the addition of speed insights suggest improved monitoring capabilities. Ensure these are properly configured and not causing performance overhead.
#!/bin/bash
# Check analytics configuration
# Look for analytics initialization
rg "analytics|speedInsights" --type ts --type tsx
# Check for potential duplicate tracking
rg "track|event|measure" --type ts --type tsx93-93: Major Next.js Version Upgrade: Review Migration Guide
The upgrade to Next.js 15 may introduce breaking changes. Key areas to verify:
- App Router compatibility
- Server Components behavior
- API Routes
- Middleware changes
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential breaking changes in Next.js 15
# Look for usage of deprecated features
rg "getInitialProps|getServerSideProps|getStaticProps" --type ts --type tsx
# Check for custom server implementations
fd "server\.ts|server\.js"
# Look for middleware usage
fd "middleware\.ts|middleware\.js"155-156: Node.js Engine Requirement
The Node.js engine requirement is set to ">=18.17". Given the upgrade to Next.js 15, verify if a higher Node.js version is recommended for optimal performance and compatibility.
#!/bin/bash
# Check Node.js version requirements
# Look for Node.js-specific features usage
rg "node:|nodejs:" package.json
rg "process\.version" --type ts --type tsx138-139: Type System Changes: React 19 Alpha Types
The React types have been updated to use alpha versions through npm aliases. This approach:
- Ensures consistent React 19 types across the project
- Uses PNPM overrides to enforce the specific versions
However, be aware that using alpha types may lead to unexpected type errors as the React 19 type system evolves.
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential type issues with React 19
# Look for uses of deprecated React types
rg "React\.FC|React\.FunctionComponent|React\.SFC" --type ts --type tsx
# Check for components that might be affected by stricter types
rg "children:|props:" --type ts --type tsxAlso applies to: 159-160
80-81: ESLint Configuration Update
The upgrade to eslint@^9.13.0 and [email protected] may introduce new linting rules. Ensure the project's ESLint configuration is compatible with these versions.
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential ESLint configuration issues
# Look for custom ESLint configurations
fd "\.eslintrc|eslint\.config"
# Check for ESLint disable comments that might need review
rg "eslint-disable" --type ts --type tsx6-6: Verify Turbo mode compatibility
The --turbo flag has been added to the dev script. While this can improve development performance, ensure all development features work correctly with Turbo mode enabled.
✅ Verification successful
Turbo mode is compatible with the codebase
Based on the analysis of the codebase:
- The Next.js configuration is standard and compatible with Turbo mode
- Dynamic imports are minimal and used appropriately (only for CrispChat and lazy-loaded components)
- The API routes and middleware implementations follow Next.js patterns that work with Turbo
- No runtime configuration patterns that would conflict with Turbo mode
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any known Turbo mode incompatibilities in the codebase
# Look for patterns that might conflict with Turbo mode
# Search for dynamic imports that might not work with Turbo
rg "import\(.*\)" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for usage of runtime config
rg "next\.config\.js|next\.config\.ts" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 723
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check for potential Turbo mode incompatibilities
# Check for dynamic imports
rg "import\(" -t js -t jsx -t ts -t tsx
# Check for runtime configuration files
fd "next.config" -e js -e ts
# Check for middleware files which might need special attention with Turbo
fd "middleware" -e js -e ts
# Look for getServerSideProps which might need verification with Turbo
rg "getServerSideProps" -t js -t jsx -t ts -t tsx
# Check for API routes that might need testing with Turbo
fd "api" -e js -t jsx -t ts -t tsx --type f
Length of output: 509
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the next.config.ts and check its content for any Turbo-sensitive configurations
cat apps/web/next.config.ts
# Let's also check the middleware files to ensure they're compatible with Turbo
cat apps/web/utils/actions/middleware.ts
cat apps/web/utils/middleware.ts
# Try a different approach to find dynamic imports
rg "import\(" --type-add 'web:*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}' -t web
# Look for getServerSideProps with proper file type definitions
rg "getServerSideProps" --type-add 'web:*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}' -t web
# Check for API routes
fd . apps/web/app/api/
Length of output: 19959
Opened a discussion blocking the release here:
vercel/next.js#72107
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores