You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
During epireview x epiverse event on 11th July, we discussed having a function that could generate random draws from across the available distributions, either filtering only on parameters with known distributions, or defining an assumed distribution to allow samples to be generated from all distributions with enough data for extraction (e.g. by using extract_param and generate.
The below script gives a tally of how many parameters in {epireview} fall into different extraction categories. 95% CrI excluded as this refers to the parameter uncertainty rather than distributional uncertainty. 95% CI can be ambiguous, so need to include a check against sample size to decide which it refers to – perhaps using the relationship (sample sd) = sd/(sample size) and identify outliers? And use the 95% CI = 2*sd approximation similarly?
During epireview x epiverse event on 11th July, we discussed having a function that could generate random draws from across the available distributions, either filtering only on parameters with known distributions, or defining an assumed distribution to allow samples to be generated from all distributions with enough data for extraction (e.g. by using
extract_param
andgenerate
.The below script gives a tally of how many parameters in {epireview} fall into different extraction categories. 95% CrI excluded as this refers to the parameter uncertainty rather than distributional uncertainty. 95% CI can be ambiguous, so need to include a check against sample size to decide which it refers to – perhaps using the relationship
(sample sd) = sd/(sample size)
and identify outliers? And use the 95% CI = 2*sd approximation similarly?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: