Use ert queue options

[oyvindeide]

Currently the queue options have to be kept manually in sync between the server and the simulator, while we also just have one long list of options, where we mix slurm, lsf and pbs related keywords. This bundles these together to simplify the configuration and the backend by just using the QueueOptions directly.

Resolves: #9611, resolves: #9613

• PR title captures the intent of the changes, and is fitting for release notes.
• Added appropriate release note label
• Commit history is consistent and clean, in line with the contribution guidelines.
• Make sure unit tests pass locally after every commit (git rebase -i main --exec 'pytest tests/ert/unit_tests -n logical -m "not integration_test"')

When applicable

• When there are user facing changes: Updated documentation
• New behavior or changes to existing untested code: Ensured that unit tests are added (See Ground Rules).
• Large PR: Prepare changes in small commits for more convenient review
• Bug fix: Add regression test for the bug
• Bug fix: Create Backport PR to latest release

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.71429% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 91.85%. Comparing base (4301b63) to head (8570b6d).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/ert/scheduler/__init__.py	70.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
src/everest/config/server_config.py	84.61%	2 Missing ⚠️
src/ert/gui/simulation/experiment_panel.py	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/everest/config/everest_config.py	91.66%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/everest/config/simulator_config.py	90.90%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #9486      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.86%   91.85%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         433      431       -2     
  Lines       26762    26695      -67     
==========================================
- Hits        24584    24521      -63     
+ Misses       2178     2174       -4     

Flag	Coverage Δ
cli-tests	39.76% <43.75%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
everest-models-test	34.64% <73.21%> (-0.03%)	⬇️
gui-tests	72.11% <50.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
integration-test	37.12% <75.00%> (-0.12%)	⬇️
performance-tests	51.96% <50.00%> (ø)
test	40.29% <76.78%> (-0.18%)	⬇️
unit-tests	74.19% <53.57%> (+0.05%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #9486 will not alter performance

_{Comparing oyvindeide:use_ert_queue_options (865dee5) with main (e5c7953)}

Summary

✅ 22 untouched benchmarks