Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support COEX #60

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2024
Merged

Support COEX #60

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2024

Conversation

bjoernQ
Copy link
Collaborator

@bjoernQ bjoernQ commented Nov 26, 2024

Closes #59

In the very beginning it was easier to not support the coex - case (because IF conditions were very inflexible). Now it's easy to support it

@@ -92,6 +95,7 @@ embassy-time = { version = "0.3.1", features = ["generic-queue-8"] }
esp-hal-embassy = { version = "0.5.0", features = ["esp32c6"] }
static_cell = { version = "2.1.0", features = ["nightly"] }
#ENDIF
critical-section = "1.2.0"
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

technically not needed but most users will end up needing it (partly resolves #51)

Copy link
Member

@jessebraham jessebraham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@jessebraham jessebraham added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 26, 2024
Merged via the queue into esp-rs:main with commit dd10238 Nov 26, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

allow option for both ble and wifi coexisting
2 participants