Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Avoiding mp.Pool in case of using only 1 worker for easier pdb debugging #127

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 13, 2024
Merged

Avoiding mp.Pool in case of using only 1 worker for easier pdb debugging #127

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
17bd6d0
avoiding mp.Pool in case of using only 1 worker for easier pdb debugging
lstasytis Jul 19, 2024
3835a37
ran pre-commit
lstasytis Aug 9, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 6 additions & 2 deletions src/qonnx/transformation/base.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -107,8 +107,12 @@ def apply(self, model):
old_nodes.append(model.graph.node.pop())

# Execute transformation in parallel
with mp.Pool(self._num_workers) as p:
new_nodes_and_bool = p.map(self.applyNodeLocal, old_nodes, chunksize=1)
if self._num_workers > 1:
with mp.Pool(self._num_workers) as p:
new_nodes_and_bool = p.map(self.applyNodeLocal, old_nodes, chunksize=1)
# execute without mp.Pool in case of 1 worker to simplify debugging
else:
new_nodes_and_bool = [self.applyNodeLocal(node) for node in old_nodes]

# extract nodes and check if the transformation needs to run again
# Note: .pop() had initially reversed the node order
Expand Down
Loading