Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: add a new, more complete boottime test #4100

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 11, 2023

Conversation

pb8o
Copy link
Contributor

@pb8o pb8o commented Sep 11, 2023

Test with all supported guest kernels, and a few different guest configurations.

In addition, boot 10 times instead of a single datapoint.

Changes

Add a boottime test

Reason

We currently only check the guest 4.14 kernel, with a small microvm size. This test generates more metrics so we have a better understanding of how VM size affects boot time.

License Acceptance

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the Apache 2.0 license. For more information on following
Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check
CONTRIBUTING.md.

PR Checklist

  • If a specific issue led to this PR, this PR closes the issue.
  • The description of changes is clear and encompassing.
  • Any required documentation changes (code and docs) are included in this PR.
  • API changes follow the Runbook for Firecracker API changes.
  • User-facing changes are mentioned in CHANGELOG.md.
  • All added/changed functionality is tested.
  • New TODOs link to an issue.
  • Commits meet contribution quality standards.

  • This functionality cannot be added in rust-vmm.

@pb8o pb8o self-assigned this Sep 11, 2023
@pb8o pb8o added Status: Awaiting review Indicates that a pull request is ready to be reviewed Type: Performance labels Sep 11, 2023
roypat
roypat previously approved these changes Sep 11, 2023
tests/integration_tests/performance/test_boottime.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 11, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (a2fab75) 82.35% compared to head (735b11f) 82.35%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4100   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.35%   82.35%           
=======================================
  Files         225      225           
  Lines       28469    28469           
=======================================
  Hits        23447    23447           
  Misses       5022     5022           
Flag Coverage Δ
4.14-c7g.metal 77.78% <ø> (ø)
4.14-m5d.metal 79.67% <ø> (ø)
4.14-m6a.metal 78.78% <ø> (ø)
4.14-m6g.metal 77.78% <ø> (ø)
4.14-m6i.metal 79.65% <ø> (ø)
5.10-c7g.metal 80.69% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m5d.metal 82.33% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m6a.metal 81.55% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m6g.metal 80.69% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m6i.metal 82.33% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-c7g.metal 80.69% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m5d.metal 82.34% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m6a.metal 81.55% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m6g.metal 80.69% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m6i.metal 82.33% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Test with all supported guest kernels, and a few different guest
configurations.

In addition, boot 10 times instead of a single datapoint.

Signed-off-by: Pablo Barbáchano <[email protected]>
@pb8o pb8o merged commit ca2b4cf into firecracker-microvm:main Sep 11, 2023
@pb8o pb8o deleted the new-boottime-test branch September 11, 2023 12:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Awaiting review Indicates that a pull request is ready to be reviewed Type: Performance
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants