Drop unneeded AppStream backwards compatibility #103
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi!
GNOME Software has upgraded the "metadata" tag to "custom" since ancient times, and way before the verification feature was introduced: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/blob/main/plugins/flatpak/gs-flatpak.c?ref_type=heads#L766
Therefore we can save a few bytes and simplify this by just removing the old compatibility code.
In the long run, it might make sense to add a dedicated
verifiedtag to AppStream catalog metadata, but that's for the future :-)Thanks for considering! - Please only merge this once the website is also able to handle the change :-)
This patch is a follow-up to #101