Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(authority-storage): Return only ids in response when idOnly=true #294

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2024

Conversation

psmagin
Copy link
Collaborator

@psmagin psmagin commented May 17, 2024

Purpose

Return only ids in response when idOnly=true

Approach

Create separate schema for ID-responses

Changes Checklist

  • API Changes: Document any API paths, methods, request or response bodies changed, added, or removed.
  • Database Schema Changes: Indicate any database schema changes and their impact. Confirm that migration scripts were created.
  • Interface Version Changes: Indicate any changes to interface versions.
  • Interface Dependencies: Document added or removed dependencies.
  • Permissions: Document any changes to permissions.
  • Logging: Confirm that logging is appropriately handled.
  • Unit Testing: Confirm that changed classes were covered by unit tests.
  • Integration Testing: Confirm that changed logic was covered by integration tests.
  • Manual Testing: Confirm that changes were tested on local or dev environment.
  • NEWS: Confirm that the NEWS file is updated with relevant information about the changes made in this pull request.

Related Issues

https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/MODELINKS-237

@psmagin psmagin marked this pull request as ready for review May 17, 2024 12:24
@psmagin psmagin requested a review from a team as a code owner May 17, 2024 12:24
@psmagin psmagin self-assigned this May 17, 2024
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented May 17, 2024

@psmagin psmagin merged commit 17701a3 into master May 17, 2024
8 checks passed
@psmagin psmagin deleted the MODELINKS-237 branch May 17, 2024 15:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants