Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MODINREACH-443 The custom field type is not catering for a list value in inn-reach code. #401

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Aug 26, 2024

Conversation

SreejaMangarapu
Copy link
Contributor

@SreejaMangarapu SreejaMangarapu commented Aug 16, 2024

Purpose

https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/MODINREACH-443

Approach

If the user record have any of the custom field value with non-string type, then with help of custom deserialization class we are ignoring the non-string values in custom fields

TODOS and Open Questions

  • Check logging

Learning

Pre-Merge Checklist:

Before merging this PR, please go through the following list and take appropriate actions.

  • Does this PR meet or exceed the expected quality standards?
    • Code coverage on new code is 80% or greater
    • Duplications on new code is 3% or less
    • There are no major code smells or security issues
  • Does this introduce breaking changes?
    • Were any API paths or methods changed, added or removed?
    • Were there any schema changes?
    • Did any of the interface versions change?
    • Were permissions changed, added, or removed?
    • Are there new interface dependencies?
    • There are no breaking changes in this PR.

If there are breaking changes, please STOP and consider the following:

  • What other modules will these changes impact?
  • Do JIRAs exist to update the impacted modules?
    • If not, please create them
    • Do they contain the appropriate level of detail? Which endpoints/schemas changed, etc.
    • Do they have all they appropriate links to blocked/related issues?
  • Are the JIRAs under active development?
    • If not, contact the project's PO and make sure they're aware of the urgency.
  • Do PRs exist for these changes?
    • If so, have they been approved?

Ideally all of the PRs involved in breaking changes would be merged in the same day to avoid breaking the folio-testing environment. Communication is paramount if that is to be achieved, especially as the number of intermodule and inter-team dependencies increase.

While it's helpful for reviewers to help identify potential problems, ensuring that it's safe to merge is ultimately the responsibility of the PR assignee.

@SreejaMangarapu SreejaMangarapu changed the title MODINREACH-443 customFields Map changed to Object from String MODINREACH-443 The custom field type is not catering for a list value in inn-reach code. Aug 16, 2024
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Aug 21, 2024

@SreejaMangarapu
Copy link
Contributor Author

In mod-inn-reach, User class is accepting custom fields as Map<String, String>, this error will occur only when any custom field of user contain non string value. To fix this issue we have added CustomFieldsDeserializer class, here with help of
if (valueNode.isTextual()) {customFields.put(key, valueNode.asText());}} we are ignoring all the non-string values.

@SreejaMangarapu SreejaMangarapu merged commit 71f8062 into master Aug 26, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants