Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(cn-browse): No highlighted match for call number with suffix when Call number type is specified #413

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 15, 2023

Conversation

ArtHov
Copy link
Contributor

@ArtHov ArtHov commented Sep 8, 2023

Purpose

No highlighted match for call number with suffix when Call number type is specified

Approach

modify comparison of shelfKey with anchor to ignore suffix if exist

Changes checklist

  • API paths, methods, request or response bodies changed, added, or removed
  • Database schema changes
  • Interface versions changes
  • Interface dependencies added, or removed
  • Permissions changed, added, or removed
  • Check logging.

TODOS and Open Questions

  • Use GitHub checklists. When solved, check the box and explain the answer.

Learning

Describe the research stage. Add links to blog posts, patterns, libraries or addons used to solve this problem.

… Call number type is specified

- modify comparison of shelfKey with anchor to ignore suffix if exist

Closes: MSEARCH-558
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Sep 14, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

100.0% 100.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@viacheslavkol viacheslavkol self-assigned this Sep 14, 2023
@viacheslavkol viacheslavkol merged commit b7c0428 into master Sep 15, 2023
3 checks passed
@viacheslavkol viacheslavkol deleted the MSEARCH-558 branch September 15, 2023 11:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants