Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UIORGS-417: Add validation for Day field in Monthly scheduler for export method #600

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 16, 2024

Conversation

alisher-epam
Copy link
Contributor

@alisher-epam alisher-epam commented Jan 15, 2024

Purpose

UIORGS-417- Add validation for Day field in Monthly scheduler for export method
Corresponding PR. folio-org/stripes-acq-components#748

Approach

Screen.Recording.2024-01-15.at.18.54.08.mov

TODOS and Open Questions

Learning

Pre-Merge Checklist

Before merging this PR, please go through the following list and take appropriate actions.

  • I've added appropriate record to the CHANGELOG.md
  • Does this PR meet or exceed the expected quality standards?
    • Code coverage on new code is 80% or greater
    • Duplications on new code is 3% or less
    • There are no major code smells or security issues
  • Does this introduce breaking changes?
    • If any API-related changes - okapi interfaces and permissions are reviewed/changed correspondingly
    • There are no breaking changes in this PR.

If there are breaking changes, please STOP and consider the following:

  • What other modules will these changes impact?
  • Do JIRAs exist to update the impacted modules?
    • If not, please create them
    • Do they contain the appropriate level of detail? Which endpoints/schemas changed, etc.
    • Do they have all they appropriate links to blocked/related issues?
  • Are the JIRAs under active development?
    • If not, contact the project's PO and make sure they're aware of the urgency.
  • Do PRs exist for these changes?
    • If so, have they been approved?

Ideally all of the PRs involved in breaking changes would be merged in the same day to avoid breaking the folio-testing environment. Communication is paramount if that is to be achieved, especially as the number of intermodule and inter-team dependencies increase.

While it's helpful for reviewers to help identify potential problems, ensuring that it's safe to merge is ultimately the responsibility of the PR assignee.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 15, 2024

Jest Unit Test Statistics

    1 files  ±0    84 suites  +1   3m 56s ⏱️ +10s
268 tests +5  268 ✔️ +5  0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
272 runs  +6  272 ✔️ +6  0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit d6ba390. ± Comparison against base commit 72e110e.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 15, 2024

BigTest Unit Test Statistics

0 tests  ±0   0 ✔️ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
0 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
0 files   ±0   0 ±0 

Results for commit d6ba390. ± Comparison against base commit 72e110e.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@alisher-epam
Copy link
Contributor Author

The code is dependent on this PR folio-org/stripes-acq-components#748
Review both, please.

@alisher-epam alisher-epam requested review from usavkov-epam and a team January 16, 2024 05:56
Copy link

@alisher-epam alisher-epam merged commit 321ce62 into develop Jan 16, 2024
6 checks passed
@alisher-epam alisher-epam deleted the UIORGS-417 branch January 16, 2024 10:45
NikitaSedyx pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2024
… export method (#600)

* UIORGS-417: Add validation for `Day` field in `Monthly` scheduler for export method

* test: add test coverage for util functions

* refactor validation code

* test: improve test coverage
NikitaSedyx pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2024
… export method (#600)

* UIORGS-417: Add validation for `Day` field in `Monthly` scheduler for export method

* test: add test coverage for util functions

* refactor validation code

* test: improve test coverage
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants