UIPFU-76 Revert - ECS - 'Do not display shadow users in search results'

[usavkov-epam]

Purpose

https://issues.folio.org/browse/UIPFU-76

As far as the "User type" filter was implemented for the user search and currently includes "shadow" users in the results, the plugin's changes were reverted to keep consistency in the query (This ticket originally was created for consistency purposes).

Approach

Revert #241

Screenshots

chrome_eC9MilST7o.mp4

Pre-Merge Checklist

Before merging this PR, please go through the following list and take appropriate actions.

• I've added appropriate record to the CHANGELOG.md
• Does this PR meet or exceed the expected quality standards?
  • Code coverage on new code is 80% or greater
  • Duplications on new code is 3% or less
  • There are no major code smells or security issues
• Does this introduce breaking changes?
  • If any API-related changes - okapi interfaces and permissions are reviewed/changed correspondingly
  • There are no breaking changes in this PR.

If there are breaking changes, please STOP and consider the following:

• What other modules will these changes impact?
• Do JIRAs exist to update the impacted modules?
  • If not, please create them
  • Do they contain the appropriate level of detail? Which endpoints/schemas changed, etc.
  • Do they have all they appropriate links to blocked/related issues?
• Are the JIRAs under active development?
  • If not, contact the project's PO and make sure they're aware of the urgency.
• Do PRs exist for these changes?
  • If so, have they been approved?

Ideally all of the PRs involved in breaking changes would be merged in the same day to avoid breaking the folio-testing environment. Communication is paramount if that is to be achieved, especially as the number of intermodule and inter-team dependencies increase.

While it's helpful for reviewers to help identify potential problems, ensuring that it's safe to merge is ultimately the responsibility of the PR assignee.

[github-actions]

Jest Unit Test Statistics

0 tests  ±0   0 ✔️ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
0 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
0 files   ±0   0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 00cf456. ± Comparison against base commit ba7bb49.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

BigTest Unit Test Statistics

17 tests   - 1   17 ✔️  - 1   1s ⏱️ -1s
  1 suites ±0     0 💤 ±0 
  1 files   ±0     0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 00cf456. ± Comparison against base commit ba7bb49.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[BogdanDenis]

Please also remove CHANGELOG entry

[Terala-Priyanka]

Please remove the entry in changelog.md and also write a summary in the PR description and also on the associated ticket as to why the changes are being reverted. This will be helpful for future visitors of the PR and ticket.

[sonarcloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
1 Code Smell

No Coverage information
0.0% Duplication