Update ItemBack class to inherit from BaseItemZeroWidget #252
Conversation
- Inherit ItemBack from BaseItemZeroWidget - Replace process method with handleCommit to change screen on ENTER command
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifying the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/ItemBack.h (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/ItemBack.h (4)
1-3: LGTM! Clean header structure.The switch to
#pragma onceand include order are appropriate.
31-40: LGTM! Good improvement from macro to inline function.The conversion from macro to inline function is a solid improvement that provides better type safety and debugging experience. The documentation is comprehensive and includes helpful example usage.
26-28: Verify BACK command handling in LcdMenu.The implementation is clean and focused. Let's verify the BACK command handling.
#!/bin/bash # Check how BACK command is handled in LcdMenu ast-grep --pattern 'process(BACK)' -A 5
17-23: Verify the impact of base class change.The inheritance and constructor changes look correct, but we should verify the impact on existing code.
✅ Verification successful
Let's broaden our search to understand the usage patterns and inheritance relationships better. This will help us verify if the base class change could have any potential impact.
Let's examine the test file, base class definition, and example usage to better understand the inheritance relationships and verify if the base class change is safe.
Base class change is safe and properly implemented
The inheritance change from
MenuItemtoBaseItemZeroWidgetis safe because:
BaseItemZeroWidgetitself inherits fromMenuItem, maintaining the polymorphic hierarchy- The helper function
ITEM_BACK()still returnsMenuItem*, preserving existing interfaceBaseItemZeroWidgetprovides the appropriate virtual methods and constructor thatItemBackuses- Test cases show the class is used primarily for navigation, which aligns with the base class's purpose
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any direct MenuItem usage with ItemBack rg -l "MenuItem\s*\*?\s*\w+\s*=\s*new\s+ItemBack" # Check if there are any static_cast or dynamic_cast from ItemBack to MenuItem rg -l "static_cast<MenuItem\s*\*>\s*\(\s*new\s+ItemBack\s*\)" rg -l "dynamic_cast<MenuItem\s*\*>\s*\(\s*new\s+ItemBack\s*\)"Length of output: 135
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for ItemBack usage patterns more broadly rg -l "ItemBack" # Search for BaseItemZeroWidget usage rg -l "BaseItemZeroWidget" # Look for inheritance patterns involving ItemBack ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ : public $_' # Look for any ItemBack instantiation patterns rg "new ItemBack" -A 2Length of output: 546
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of ItemBack test file to understand usage patterns cat test/ItemBack.test.yml # Check the BaseItemZeroWidget header to understand the inheritance hierarchy cat src/BaseItemZeroWidget.h # Look for any code that might be using ItemBack through polymorphic behavior rg "MenuItem" -A 2 examples/ItemBack/ItemBack.inoLength of output: 2159
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/wokwi_ci.yml (1 hunks)
- src/ItemBack.h (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/ItemBack.h (7)
1-1: Good use of#pragma oncefor include guard.Replacing the traditional include guard with
#pragma oncesimplifies the code and is supported by most modern compilers.
3-3: Correct inclusion ofBaseItemZeroWidget.h.Including the header for
BaseItemZeroWidgetis necessary due to the updated inheritance.
14-15: Documentation accurately reflects class changes.The updated documentation correctly describes the inheritance from
BaseItemZeroWidgetand the behavior ofhandleCommit.
17-17: Inheritance updated toBaseItemZeroWidgetsuccessfully.Changing the base class to
BaseItemZeroWidgetaligns with the intended design modifications.
26-28:handleCommitmethod implementation is appropriate.The
handleCommitmethod correctly navigates back by processing theBACKcommand through themenuobject.
31-40: RefactoringITEM_BACKfrom a macro to an inline function enhances safety.Converting
ITEM_BACKto an inline function improves type safety and eliminates potential issues associated with macros.
23-23:⚠️ Potential issueConsider retaining the default parameter for the constructor.
The original constructor had a default value for
text(const char* text = ".."). Removing the default could break existing code that createsItemBackwithout specifyingtext. To maintain backward compatibility, consider keeping the default parameter.Run the following script to check for instances where
ItemBackis instantiated without arguments:
|
Memory usage change @ a490e6a
Click for full report table
Click for full report CSV |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ItemBackfunctionality with improved command handling.BACKcommand.Refactor
#pragma once.Chores