Improve memory management and string handling in ItemInput class #256
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Removed unnecessary dynamic memory allocation - Updated value assignment logic for better efficiency
WalkthroughThe changes made to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
coderabbitai
bot
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/ItemInput.h (1)
Line range hint
1-304: Improve class design with proper memory managementThe class needs several architectural improvements to ensure proper memory management and prevent resource leaks:
- Implement the Rule of Three (destructor, copy constructor, assignment operator)
- Consider using RAII principles
- Add clear ownership semantics for the
valuepointerHere's a suggested implementation of the missing methods:
class ItemInput : public MenuItem { public: // ... existing constructors ... // Destructor ~ItemInput() { delete[] value; } // Copy constructor ItemInput(const ItemInput& other) : MenuItem(other.text), value(new char[strlen(other.value) + 1]), view(other.view), cursor(other.cursor), callback(other.callback) { strcpy(value, other.value); } // Assignment operator ItemInput& operator=(const ItemInput& other) { if (this != &other) { MenuItem::operator=(other); char* newValue = new char[strlen(other.value) + 1]; strcpy(newValue, other.value); delete[] value; value = newValue; view = other.view; cursor = other.cursor; callback = other.callback; } return *this; } // ... rest of the class ... };Consider also:
- Using smart pointers if available in your environment
- Implementing move semantics (Rule of Five) if C++11 is available
- Using a fixed-size buffer for embedded systems to avoid dynamic allocation
- Dynamically allocate buffer for value - Update value pointer after concatenation - Free previous value memory allocation
|
Memory usage change @ 894f51c
Click for full report table
Click for full report CSV |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary by CodeRabbit