-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 441
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update volcanoplot #6510
Update volcanoplot #6510
Conversation
<param name="shape_or_facet" value="facet" /> <!-- Testing the facet option --> | ||
<output name="plot"> | ||
<assert_contents> | ||
<has_size value="5007" delta="1000" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We do have better imaging asserts nowadays, if you want to give it a try.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you mean compare="image_diff"
, or are there other undocumented diff options, I think not needed here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
image_diff but there are other image assertions: https://docs.galaxyproject.org/en/latest/dev/schema.html#has-image-center-of-mass
tools/volcanoplot/volcanoplot.xml
Outdated
<test expect_num_outputs="1"> | ||
<!-- Ensure input labels and plot options work --> | ||
<param name="input" ftype="tabular" value="input.tab"/> | ||
<param name="fdr_col" value="5" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fdr_col twice?
ping @paulzierep |
…ols-iuc into update-volcanoplot
@bgruening the macros here are not being used in the version, and then this was uploaded to the toolshed without a version change, see https://github.com/galaxyproject/tools-iuc/pull/6510/files#diff-fa1711e49e2c00dd46c9d86d082e9091e5468442a270582b30e3c92cdad4557dR1 |
This explains #6620 |
Do you see the problem in this PR? |
Ah I see. I can release a new version with bump, will this solve your problem? |
I would prefer if the 0.0.6 version is reinstated in the toolshed to the last reasonable 0.0.6 revision, I have a bunch of workflows pinned to that. Also this is breaking an IWC workflow. |
And then the newer changes are pushed in a different version |
@bgruening if the tool XML and macros at 84949ce could be pushed to the toolshed as they are there, then we could have a subsequent PR where we simply flip the version for the newer changes, and "the past will be fixed" :-). |
FOR CONTRIBUTOR: