Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

increase server status timeouts #211

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

kon-angelo
Copy link
Contributor

@kon-angelo kon-angelo commented Dec 17, 2024

How to categorize this PR?

/area control-plane
/kind regression
/platform openstack

What this PR does / why we need it:

Increase timeout of server status checks

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

Increase VM status check timeout to 1200 seconds.

@kon-angelo kon-angelo requested review from a team as code owners December 17, 2024 09:51
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added area/control-plane Control plane related kind/regression Bug that hit us already in the past and that is reappearing/requires a proper solution platform/openstack OpenStack platform/infrastructure needs/review Needs review size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Dec 17, 2024
AndreasBurger
AndreasBurger previously approved these changes Dec 17, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Dec 17, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Dec 17, 2024
@hebelsan
Copy link
Contributor

Release not should be 1200 seconds and not 3600 right?

@kon-angelo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@hebelsan fixed, thank you :)

Copy link
Contributor

@hebelsan hebelsan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging and removed needs/review Needs review labels Dec 17, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Dec 17, 2024
@kon-angelo kon-angelo merged commit d840941 into gardener:master Dec 17, 2024
6 checks passed
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged) label Dec 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/control-plane Control plane related kind/regression Bug that hit us already in the past and that is reappearing/requires a proper solution needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) platform/openstack OpenStack platform/infrastructure reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants