Test Case :: Order Min Max #2367
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces new classes and methods to enhance the functionality of a web application, focusing on user account management, product interactions, and vendor dashboard operations. It adds TypeScript type definitions and a random string generator as dependencies. Various page object classes are created to encapsulate interactions with UI elements, improving the structure and maintainability of the test code. Additionally, end-to-end tests are implemented to validate features related to minimum and maximum order quantities across different contexts. Changes
Poem
Tip OpenAI O1 model for chat
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
tests/pw/pages/frontend/vendor-dashboard/products/products-list.page.ts (1)
5-7: Consider removing the unnecessary constructor.The static analysis tool suggests that the constructor is unnecessary. If the
BasePageconstructor doesn't require any parameters, you can safely remove this constructor.export default class VendorProductListPage extends BasePage { - constructor(page: Page) { - super(page); - } productTitle() { return this.page.locator(`//td[@data-title="Name"]/strong/a`); } async clickOnProductWithTitle(productTitle: string) { await this.productTitle().getByText(productTitle).click(); } }However, if the
BasePageconstructor requires thePageobject, then keep the constructor as is.Tools
Biome
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/pages/frontend/vendor-dashboard/orders/vendor-all-orders.page.ts (1)
4-16: LGTM! Consider removing the unnecessary constructor.The
VendorAllOrdersPageclass and its methods look good. TheorderTitleByIdmethod correctly uses an XPath locator to find the order title element by the order ID, and theclickOnOrderByIdmethod provides a useful abstraction for clicking on an order title.As suggested by the static analysis tool, the empty constructor can be safely removed since it doesn't add any functionality. Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary constructor:
export default class VendorAllOrdersPage extends BasePage { - constructor(page: Page) { - super(page); - } - orderTitleById(orderId: string) { return this.page.locator(`//td[@data-title="Order"]/a/strong[text()="Order ${orderId}"]`); } async clickOnOrderById(orderId: string) { await this.orderTitleById(orderId).click(); } }Tools
Biome
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/pages/wp-admin/common/sidebar.page.ts (1)
4-20: LGTM! Consider removing the unnecessary constructor.The
WpAdminSidebarclass is correctly implemented and the methods are properly defined. However, the constructor is unnecessary as it does not add any additional functionality.Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary constructor:
export default class WpAdminSidebar extends BasePage { - constructor(page: Page) { - super(page); - } sideMenu(title: string) { return this.page.locator('.wp-menu-name').getByText(title); }Tools
Biome
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/pages/frontend/shop/single-product.page.ts (1)
4-20: LGTM! Consider removing the unnecessary constructor.The
SingleProductPageclass is well-structured and follows the Page Object Model pattern. The locators are defined as separate methods, which improves readability and maintainability. TheclickOnAddToCartButtonmethod encapsulates the interaction with the "Add to Cart" button, which is a good practice.As suggested by the static analysis tool, the constructor is unnecessary since it only calls the
superconstructor without adding any additional functionality. Consider removing the constructor:export default class SingleProductPage extends BasePage { - constructor(page: Page) { - super(page); - } addToCartButton() { return this.page.locator('.single_add_to_cart_button'); } // ... }Tools
Biome
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/pages/frontend/vendor-dashboard/common/vendor-sidebar.page.ts (1)
5-7: Remove the unnecessary constructor.The constructor is empty and does not add any additional functionality. Consider removing it to simplify the class.
Apply this diff to remove the constructor:
-constructor(page: Page) { - super(page); -}Tools
Biome
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/pages/frontend/my-orders/customer-order-details.page.ts (1)
1-28: LGTM! Consider using more robust selectors and adding documentation.The
CustomerOrderDetailsPageclass follows a standard pattern for defining page objects in a test framework. The constructor is necessary for initializing the base class, so the static analysis tool's suggestion to remove it is a false positive.The methods in the class are well-named and follow a consistent naming convention. However, consider using more robust selectors, such as data attributes or CSS classes, instead of XPath selectors, which can be brittle if the page structure changes.
Additionally, the class could benefit from additional documentation, such as comments describing the purpose of each method and the expected behavior of the page. This will make the code more maintainable and easier for other developers to understand.
Tools
Biome
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/pages/wp-admin/dokan/settings/modules.page.ts (1)
1-36: LGTM! Consider removing the unnecessary constructor and adding documentation.The
DokanModulesPageclass is well-structured and follows best practices for interacting with page elements usingLocatorobjects. The methods have clear and descriptive names, making the code readable and maintainable.However, there are a couple of suggestions for further improvement:
- The constructor is unnecessary, as it only calls the
superconstructor without adding any additional functionality. Consider removing it to simplify the code.Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary constructor:
-constructor(page: Page) { - super(page); -}
- Adding documentation for the class and its methods would improve the code's readability and make it easier for other developers to understand the purpose and expected behavior of each method. Consider adding comments to explain what each method does and how it interacts with the page elements.
Overall, great work on this class! Let me know if you have any questions or if you'd like assistance with adding the documentation.
Tools
Biome
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/tests/e2e/order-min-max/min-max-01.spec.ts (1)
11-32: Great test structure and use of page objects!The test structure and naming conventions follow best practices for Playwright tests. The use of page objects improves the readability and maintainability of the test code. The test case covers an important scenario of enabling the "Min Max Quantities" module.
Consider replacing the timeout with a more explicit wait condition.
The test case uses a timeout of 2 seconds on line 27, which might not be necessary or could be replaced with a more explicit wait condition. For example, you could wait for a specific element to be visible or have a certain state before proceeding with the test.
- await page.waitForTimeout(2000); + await page.waitForSelector('selector-for-element-to-wait-for');tests/pw/pages/wp-admin/dokan/settings/shipping-status.page.ts (1)
5-7: Remove the unnecessary constructor.The constructor is simply passing the
Pageobject to thesuperconstructor without doing anything else. This is unnecessary and can be safely removed.Apply this diff to remove the constructor:
-constructor(page: Page) { - super(page); -}Tools
Biome
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
tests/pw/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (19)
- tests/pw/package.json (2 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/frontend/my-account/auth/my-account-auth.page.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/frontend/my-orders/all-my-orders.page.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/frontend/my-orders/customer-order-details.page.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/frontend/shop/shop.page.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/frontend/shop/single-product.page.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/frontend/vendor-dashboard/common/vendor-sidebar.page.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/frontend/vendor-dashboard/orders/vendor-all-orders.page.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/frontend/vendor-dashboard/orders/vendor-edit-order.page.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/frontend/vendor-dashboard/products/product-add-edit.page.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/frontend/vendor-dashboard/products/products-list.page.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/frontend/vendor-dashboard/settings/store/vendor-store.page.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/wp-admin/common/sidebar.page.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/wp-admin/dokan/settings/modules.page.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/wp-admin/dokan/settings/shipping-status.page.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/wp-admin/products/all-products.page.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/wp-admin/products/edit-product.page.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/order-min-max/min-max-01.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/order-min-max/min-max-02.spec.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
tests/pw/pages/wp-admin/products/edit-product.page.ts
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/pages/frontend/shop/shop.page.ts
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/pages/frontend/vendor-dashboard/products/products-list.page.ts
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/pages/wp-admin/products/all-products.page.ts
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/pages/frontend/vendor-dashboard/orders/vendor-all-orders.page.ts
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/pages/wp-admin/common/sidebar.page.ts
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/pages/frontend/my-orders/all-my-orders.page.ts
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/pages/frontend/shop/single-product.page.ts
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/pages/frontend/vendor-dashboard/common/vendor-sidebar.page.ts
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/pages/frontend/vendor-dashboard/settings/store/vendor-store.page.ts
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/pages/frontend/my-account/auth/my-account-auth.page.ts
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/pages/frontend/my-orders/customer-order-details.page.ts
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/pages/wp-admin/dokan/settings/modules.page.ts
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/pages/frontend/vendor-dashboard/products/product-add-edit.page.ts
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/pages/wp-admin/dokan/settings/shipping-status.page.ts
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/pages/frontend/vendor-dashboard/orders/vendor-edit-order.page.ts
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/tests/e2e/order-min-max/min-max-02.spec.ts
[error] 38-38: Don't focus the test.
The 'only' method is often used for debugging or during implementation. It should be removed before deploying to production.
Consider removing 'only' to ensure all tests are executed.
Unsafe fix: Remove focus from test.(lint/suspicious/noFocusedTests)
Additional comments not posted (32)
tests/pw/pages/frontend/vendor-dashboard/products/products-list.page.ts (1)
1-16: LGTM!The
VendorProductListPageclass is well-structured and follows good practices:
- It extends the
BasePageclass, promoting code reuse and inheritance.- The
productTitlemethod returns a locator for the product title element using a specific and correct XPath selector.- The
clickOnProductWithTitlemethod encapsulates the logic to click on a product with a specific title, improving readability and maintainability.- The code is clean, readable, and follows TypeScript best practices.
Great job!
Tools
Biome
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/pages/frontend/my-orders/all-my-orders.page.ts (1)
9-15: LGTM!The
viewButtonByOrderIdandclickOnViewButtonByOrderIdmethods are implemented correctly:
viewButtonByOrderIdreturns a locator for the view button of a specific order based on the providedorderIdusing an XPath locator.clickOnViewButtonByOrderIdclicks on the view button of a specific order by using theviewButtonByOrderIdmethod to get the locator and then clicking on it. The method is marked asasyncand usesawaitto handle the asynchronous click operation.The code looks good and should work as expected.
tests/pw/pages/frontend/vendor-dashboard/common/vendor-sidebar.page.ts (1)
1-25: LGTM!The
VendorDashboardSidebarPageclass is well-structured and follows best practices:
- The class extends the
BasePageclass, which likely contains common functionality for all pages.- The
sidebarMenumethod uses a flexible locator to find sidebar menu items based on their class attribute.- The click methods are async and use the
awaitkeyword to ensure the actions are completed before proceeding.- The class encapsulates the interactions with the vendor dashboard sidebar, making the test code more readable and maintainable.
Great job!
Tools
Biome
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/pages/frontend/vendor-dashboard/products/product-add-edit.page.ts (1)
4-40: Excellent implementation of the Page Object Model!The
VendorProductAddEditPageclass is well-structured and follows the Page Object Model pattern. It encapsulates the interactions with the UI elements related to adding or editing a vendor product, promoting reusability and maintainability of the test code. The getter methods and async methods are correctly implemented, and their names are descriptive and follow a consistent naming convention.The class aligns with the PR objectives of enhancing the test code structure and implementing tests for minimum and maximum order quantities.
Tools
Biome
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
tests/pw/tests/e2e/order-min-max/min-max-01.spec.ts (2)
1-6: LGTM!The imports are correctly used and follow the necessary conventions. The use of environment variables for sensitive data is a good practice.
8-10: LGTM!The variable declarations are correctly typed and used later in the test suite.
tests/pw/pages/wp-admin/dokan/settings/shipping-status.page.ts (8)
9-11: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented and the locator should work as expected.
13-15: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented and the locator should work as expected.
17-19: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented and the locator should work as expected.
35-37: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented and the locator should work as expected.
39-41: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented and should work as expected.
43-45: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented and should work as expected.
47-49: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented and should work as expected.
51-53: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented and should work as expected.
tests/pw/pages/frontend/vendor-dashboard/orders/vendor-edit-order.page.ts (14)
9-11: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented and the locator for the "Create New Shipment" button is accurate.
13-15: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented and the locator for the shipment item checkbox is accurate.
17-19: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented and the locator for the shipping status dropdown is accurate.
21-23: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented and the locator for the shipping provider dropdown is accurate.
25-27: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented and the locator for the shipping date field is accurate.
29-31: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented and the locator for the shipping tracking number field is accurate.
33-35: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented and the locator for the "Create Shipment" button is accurate.
37-39: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented and it accurately clicks on the "Create New Shipment" button.
41-43: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented and it accurately clicks on the shipment item checkbox based on the provided
itemNumber.
45-47: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented and it accurately selects the provided
statusfrom the shipping status dropdown.
49-51: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented and it accurately selects the provided
providerNamefrom the shipping provider dropdown.
53-55: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented and it accurately fills the shipping date field with the provided
date.
57-59: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented and it accurately fills the shipping tracking number field with the provided
trackingNumber.
61-63: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented and it accurately clicks on the "Create Shipment" button.
tests/pw/package.json (2)
53-53: LGTM!Adding
@types/randomstringtodevDependenciesis a good practice. It provides TypeScript type definitions for therandomstringlibrary, enhancing type safety and developer experience when using this library in TypeScript projects.
72-72: Verify the usage ofrandomstringin the codebase.Adding the
randomstringlibrary todependenciesis fine. It's a utility for generating random strings, which can be useful for creating unique identifiers or tokens in the application.Just ensure that
randomstringis being used appropriately in the codebase for its intended purpose.Run the following script to verify the usage of
randomstring:Verification successful
Usage of
randomstringverified and appropriate.The
randomstringlibrary is used in the test filetests/pw/tests/e2e/order-min-max/min-max-02.spec.tsto generate random strings for product titles. This is an appropriate use case for generating dynamic test data. No issues found with its usage.
tests/pw/tests/e2e/order-min-max/min-max-02.spec.ts:randomstringis used to generate a random string for a product title.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `randomstring` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `randomstring`. Expect: Occurrences in the codebase. rg --type typescript $'randomstring'Length of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `randomstring` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `randomstring` in all files. rg 'randomstring'Length of output: 378
tests/pw/tests/e2e/order-min-max/min-max-02.spec.ts (2)
105-125: LGTM!The test is well-structured and follows a clear sequence of steps to verify the expected behavior. It uses page objects effectively to interact with the UI elements, improving the readability and maintainability of the test code. The assertion compares the actual error message with the expected error message, ensuring the correct behavior.
127-150: LGTM!The test is well-structured and follows a clear sequence of steps to verify the expected behavior. It uses page objects effectively to interact with the UI elements, improving the readability and maintainability of the test code. The assertion compares the actual error message with the expected error message, ensuring the correct behavior.
| export default class EditProductPage extends BasePage { | ||
| constructor(page: Page) { | ||
| super(page); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| publishButton() { | ||
| return this.page.locator('#publish'); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async clickOnPublishButton() { | ||
| await this.publishButton().click(); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The publishButton and clickOnPublishButton methods look good, but the constructor can be removed.
The publishButton method correctly returns the locator for the publish button, and the clickOnPublishButton method uses it to click on the button. The implementation of these methods is accurate.
However, as the static analysis tool suggests, the constructor is unnecessary since it only calls the super constructor and doesn't do anything else.
You can safely remove the constructor:
export default class EditProductPage extends BasePage {
- constructor(page: Page) {
- super(page);
- }
publishButton() {
return this.page.locator('#publish');
}
async clickOnPublishButton() {
await this.publishButton().click();
}
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export default class EditProductPage extends BasePage { | |
| constructor(page: Page) { | |
| super(page); | |
| } | |
| publishButton() { | |
| return this.page.locator('#publish'); | |
| } | |
| async clickOnPublishButton() { | |
| await this.publishButton().click(); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| export default class EditProductPage extends BasePage { | |
| publishButton() { | |
| return this.page.locator('#publish'); | |
| } | |
| async clickOnPublishButton() { | |
| await this.publishButton().click(); | |
| } | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
| export default class ShopPage extends BasePage { | ||
| constructor(page: Page) { | ||
| super(page); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| productTitle() { | ||
| return this.page.locator('.woocommerce-loop-product__title'); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async clickOnProductWithTitle(productTitle: string) { | ||
| await this.productTitle().getByText(productTitle).click(); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM with a minor suggestion!
The ShopPage class structure and method implementations look good. The productTitle method correctly returns the locator for the product title element, and the clickOnProductWithTitle method finds the product title element and clicks on it as expected.
However, as suggested by the static analysis tool, the constructor is unnecessary since it's not doing anything other than calling the super constructor. You can safely remove it to simplify the code.
Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary constructor:
export default class ShopPage extends BasePage {
- constructor(page: Page) {
- super(page);
- }
productTitle() {
return this.page.locator('.woocommerce-loop-product__title');
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export default class ShopPage extends BasePage { | |
| constructor(page: Page) { | |
| super(page); | |
| } | |
| productTitle() { | |
| return this.page.locator('.woocommerce-loop-product__title'); | |
| } | |
| async clickOnProductWithTitle(productTitle: string) { | |
| await this.productTitle().getByText(productTitle).click(); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| export default class ShopPage extends BasePage { | |
| productTitle() { | |
| return this.page.locator('.woocommerce-loop-product__title'); | |
| } | |
| async clickOnProductWithTitle(productTitle: string) { | |
| await this.productTitle().getByText(productTitle).click(); | |
| } | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
| export default class AllProductsPage extends BasePage { | ||
| constructor(page: Page) { | ||
| super(page); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| productTitleById(productId: string) { | ||
| return this.page.locator(`//tr[@id="post-${productId}"]/td[2]/strong/a`); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async clickOnProductTitleById(productId: string) { | ||
| await this.productTitleById(productId).click(); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM! Consider removing the unnecessary constructor.
The AllProductsPage class is well-structured and follows best practices. The methods are implemented correctly and provide useful functionality for interacting with the "All Products" page.
However, as the static analysis tool suggests, the constructor is unnecessary since it only calls the super constructor without adding any additional functionality.
You can simplify the code by removing the constructor:
export default class AllProductsPage extends BasePage {
- constructor(page: Page) {
- super(page);
- }
productTitleById(productId: string) {
return this.page.locator(`//tr[@id="post-${productId}"]/td[2]/strong/a`);
}
async clickOnProductTitleById(productId: string) {
await this.productTitleById(productId).click();
}
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export default class AllProductsPage extends BasePage { | |
| constructor(page: Page) { | |
| super(page); | |
| } | |
| productTitleById(productId: string) { | |
| return this.page.locator(`//tr[@id="post-${productId}"]/td[2]/strong/a`); | |
| } | |
| async clickOnProductTitleById(productId: string) { | |
| await this.productTitleById(productId).click(); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| export default class AllProductsPage extends BasePage { | |
| productTitleById(productId: string) { | |
| return this.page.locator(`//tr[@id="post-${productId}"]/td[2]/strong/a`); | |
| } | |
| async clickOnProductTitleById(productId: string) { | |
| await this.productTitleById(productId).click(); | |
| } | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
| constructor(page: Page) { | ||
| super(page); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove the unnecessary constructor.
The constructor in the AllMyOrdersPage class is unnecessary because it only calls the parent constructor with the provided Page object and doesn't add any additional functionality or initialization. You can remove the constructor and let the class inherit the parent constructor directly to simplify the code without changing the behavior.
Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary constructor:
-constructor(page: Page) {
- super(page);
-}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| constructor(page: Page) { | |
| super(page); | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
| export default class VendorStoreSettingsPage extends BasePage { | ||
| constructor(page: Page) { | ||
| super(page); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| minimumOrderAmountInputField() { | ||
| return this.page.locator('#min_amount_to_order'); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| maximumOrderAmountInputField() { | ||
| return this.page.locator('#max_amount_to_order'); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| updateSettingsButton() { | ||
| return this.page.locator(`//input[@name="dokan_update_store_settings"]`); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async enterMaximumOrderAmount(amount: string) { | ||
| await this.maximumOrderAmountInputField().fill(amount); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async clickOnUpdateSettingsButton() { | ||
| await this.updateSettingsButton().click(); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The VendorStoreSettingsPage class is well-structured and follows best practices. Consider removing the unnecessary constructor.
The class is well-designed and follows the Page Object Model pattern. The locators used in the methods are specific and should reliably locate the intended elements. The async methods use the await keyword correctly to wait for the actions to complete before proceeding. The class name and method names are descriptive and follow a consistent naming convention.
As suggested by the static analysis tool, the constructor is unnecessary as it only calls the super constructor without any additional logic. Removing it will not affect the functionality of the class.
Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary constructor:
export default class VendorStoreSettingsPage extends BasePage {
- constructor(page: Page) {
- super(page);
- }
minimumOrderAmountInputField() {
return this.page.locator('#min_amount_to_order');
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export default class VendorStoreSettingsPage extends BasePage { | |
| constructor(page: Page) { | |
| super(page); | |
| } | |
| minimumOrderAmountInputField() { | |
| return this.page.locator('#min_amount_to_order'); | |
| } | |
| maximumOrderAmountInputField() { | |
| return this.page.locator('#max_amount_to_order'); | |
| } | |
| updateSettingsButton() { | |
| return this.page.locator(`//input[@name="dokan_update_store_settings"]`); | |
| } | |
| async enterMaximumOrderAmount(amount: string) { | |
| await this.maximumOrderAmountInputField().fill(amount); | |
| } | |
| async clickOnUpdateSettingsButton() { | |
| await this.updateSettingsButton().click(); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| export default class VendorStoreSettingsPage extends BasePage { | |
| minimumOrderAmountInputField() { | |
| return this.page.locator('#min_amount_to_order'); | |
| } | |
| maximumOrderAmountInputField() { | |
| return this.page.locator('#max_amount_to_order'); | |
| } | |
| updateSettingsButton() { | |
| return this.page.locator(`//input[@name="dokan_update_store_settings"]`); | |
| } | |
| async enterMaximumOrderAmount(amount: string) { | |
| await this.maximumOrderAmountInputField().fill(amount); | |
| } | |
| async clickOnUpdateSettingsButton() { | |
| await this.updateSettingsButton().click(); | |
| } | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
| export default class MyAccountAuthPage extends BasePage { | ||
| constructor(page: Page) { | ||
| super(page); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| usernameInputField() { | ||
| return this.page.locator('#username'); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| passwordInputField() { | ||
| return this.page.locator('#password'); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| loginButton() { | ||
| return this.page.locator('//button[@name="login"]'); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async enterUsername(username: string) { | ||
| await this.usernameInputField().fill(username); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async enterPassword(password: string) { | ||
| await this.passwordInputField().fill(password); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async clickOnLoginButton() { | ||
| await this.loginButton().click(); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great job with the Page Object class! Just one small improvement.
The MyAccountAuthPage class is well-structured and follows the Page Object Model pattern. The methods are named appropriately and encapsulate the interactions with the page elements.
However, as the static analysis tool correctly points out, the constructor is unnecessary since it only calls the super constructor without any additional logic.
Please apply this diff to remove the unnecessary constructor:
export default class MyAccountAuthPage extends BasePage {
- constructor(page: Page) {
- super(page);
- }
usernameInputField() {
return this.page.locator('#username');
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export default class MyAccountAuthPage extends BasePage { | |
| constructor(page: Page) { | |
| super(page); | |
| } | |
| usernameInputField() { | |
| return this.page.locator('#username'); | |
| } | |
| passwordInputField() { | |
| return this.page.locator('#password'); | |
| } | |
| loginButton() { | |
| return this.page.locator('//button[@name="login"]'); | |
| } | |
| async enterUsername(username: string) { | |
| await this.usernameInputField().fill(username); | |
| } | |
| async enterPassword(password: string) { | |
| await this.passwordInputField().fill(password); | |
| } | |
| async clickOnLoginButton() { | |
| await this.loginButton().click(); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| export default class MyAccountAuthPage extends BasePage { | |
| usernameInputField() { | |
| return this.page.locator('#username'); | |
| } | |
| passwordInputField() { | |
| return this.page.locator('#password'); | |
| } | |
| loginButton() { | |
| return this.page.locator('//button[@name="login"]'); | |
| } | |
| async enterUsername(username: string) { | |
| await this.usernameInputField().fill(username); | |
| } | |
| async enterPassword(password: string) { | |
| await this.passwordInputField().fill(password); | |
| } | |
| async clickOnLoginButton() { | |
| await this.loginButton().click(); | |
| } | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
| constructor(page: Page) { | ||
| super(page); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove the unnecessary constructor.
The static analysis tool has correctly flagged the constructor as unnecessary. Since the constructor is empty and doesn't add any additional functionality, it can be safely removed without affecting the class behavior.
Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary constructor:
-constructor(page: Page) {
- super(page);
-}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| constructor(page: Page) { | |
| super(page); | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
| async shippingStatusItem(status: string) { | ||
| const list = this.page.locator('//ul[@class="dokan-settings-repeatable-list"]/li').all(); | ||
|
|
||
| let locator; | ||
| for (const item of await list) { | ||
| const text = await item.textContent(); | ||
| if (text?.includes(status)) { | ||
| locator = item; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return locator; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, but consider optimizing the method.
The method is correctly implemented and should work as expected. However, it could be optimized by using a more specific XPath selector to find the element with the given status directly, instead of looping through all the elements.
Apply this diff to optimize the method:
-async shippingStatusItem(status: string) {
- const list = this.page.locator('//ul[@class="dokan-settings-repeatable-list"]/li').all();
-
- let locator;
- for (const item of await list) {
- const text = await item.textContent();
- if (text?.includes(status)) {
- locator = item;
- }
- }
-
- return locator;
-}
+async shippingStatusItem(status: string) {
+ return this.page.locator(`//ul[@class="dokan-settings-repeatable-list"]/li[contains(., "${status}")]`);
+}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async shippingStatusItem(status: string) { | |
| const list = this.page.locator('//ul[@class="dokan-settings-repeatable-list"]/li').all(); | |
| let locator; | |
| for (const item of await list) { | |
| const text = await item.textContent(); | |
| if (text?.includes(status)) { | |
| locator = item; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return locator; | |
| } | |
| async shippingStatusItem(status: string) { | |
| return this.page.locator(`//ul[@class="dokan-settings-repeatable-list"]/li[contains(., "${status}")]`); | |
| } |
| constructor(page: Page) { | ||
| super(page); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove the unnecessary constructor.
The constructor is simply calling the super method with the page object, which is already being done in the BasePage class. The constructor is not adding any additional functionality and can be safely removed.
Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary constructor:
-constructor(page: Page) {
- super(page);
-}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| constructor(page: Page) { | |
| super(page); | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 5-7: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
| let vendorBrowser: Browser; | ||
| let customerBrowser: Browser; | ||
|
|
||
| test.describe.only('Order Min-Max - Single Product Page', () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove the only method from the test suite.
The static analysis tool correctly points out that the only method is used to focus on a specific test suite, which is often done for debugging or during implementation. However, it should be removed before deploying to production to ensure all tests are executed.
Please remove the only method from the test suite:
-test.describe.only('Order Min-Max - Single Product Page', () => {
+test.describe('Order Min-Max - Single Product Page', () => {Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| test.describe.only('Order Min-Max - Single Product Page', () => { | |
| test.describe('Order Min-Max - Single Product Page', () => { |
Tools
Biome
[error] 38-38: Don't focus the test.
The 'only' method is often used for debugging or during implementation. It should be removed before deploying to production.
Consider removing 'only' to ensure all tests are executed.
Unsafe fix: Remove focus from test.(lint/suspicious/noFocusedTests)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- tests/pw/pages/frontend/cart.page.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/frontend/navigation/main-menu.page.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/frontend/shop/single-product.page.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/frontend/vendor-dashboard/settings/store/vendor-store.page.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/order-min-max/min-max-02.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/order-min-max/min-max-03.spec.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- tests/pw/pages/frontend/vendor-dashboard/settings/store/vendor-store.page.ts
Additional context used
Biome
tests/pw/tests/e2e/order-min-max/min-max-03.spec.ts
[error] 42-42: Don't focus the test.
The 'only' method is often used for debugging or during implementation. It should be removed before deploying to production.
Consider removing 'only' to ensure all tests are executed.
Unsafe fix: Remove focus from test.(lint/suspicious/noFocusedTests)
Additional comments not posted (17)
tests/pw/pages/frontend/navigation/main-menu.page.ts (1)
3-11: LGTM!The
StorefrontMainMenuclass is well-structured and follows the Page Object Model pattern. The class name and method names are descriptive and follow the naming conventions. The class is small and focused on a single responsibility.The
cartContentLinkmethod correctly returns a locator for the cart contents link, and theclickOnCartContentLinkmethod correctly clicks on the cart contents link.Overall, the code changes are correct and maintainable.
tests/pw/pages/frontend/shop/single-product.page.ts (5)
4-6: LGTM!The method logic is correct, and the XPath locator should uniquely identify the quantity input field for a given product title.
8-10: LGTM!The method logic is correct, and the CSS selector should uniquely identify the "Add to Cart" button.
12-14: LGTM!The method logic is correct, and the XPath locator should uniquely identify the error message element.
16-18: LGTM!The method logic is correct, and it uses the
quantityInputFieldFormethod to ensure that the correct input field is filled for the given product title.
20-22: LGTM!The method logic is correct, and it uses the
addToCartButtonmethod to ensure that the correct button is clicked.tests/pw/pages/frontend/cart.page.ts (7)
3-27: LGTM!The
CartPageclass is well-structured and follows the Page Object Model pattern. The methods are named appropriately and encapsulate specific actions on the cart page. The selectors used in the methods are specific and should uniquely identify the elements on the page.
4-6: LGTM!The
quantityInputFieldFormethod correctly locates the quantity input field for a given product title using a specific XPath selector. The selector should uniquely identify the input field based on the provided product title.
8-10: LGTM!The
updateCartButtonmethod correctly locates the update cart button using a specific XPath selector based on thenameattribute of the button element.
12-14: LGTM!The
quantityErrorElementmethod correctly locates the quantity error element using a specific XPath selector based on the class and parent element of the error element.
16-18: LGTM!The
woocommerceErrorMessagemethod correctly locates the WooCommerce error message element using a specific XPath selector based on the class and parent elements of the error message element.
20-22: LGTM!The
enterQuantityValuemethod correctly enters a quantity value for a given product title by locating the quantity input field using thequantityInputFieldFormethod and filling it with the providedquantityValue. The method is marked as async, indicating that it performs an asynchronous action.
24-26: LGTM!The
clickOnUpdateCartButtonmethod correctly clicks on the update cart button by locating it using theupdateCartButtonmethod and then clicking on it. The method is marked as async, indicating that it performs an asynchronous action.tests/pw/tests/e2e/order-min-max/min-max-02.spec.ts (2)
105-125: LGTM!The test case is correctly testing the maximum quantity limit functionality on the single product page. The test case is using the correct page objects and methods to interact with the UI and the correct assertions to verify the expected behavior.
127-150: LGTM!The test case is correctly testing the maximum order amount functionality on the single product page. The test case is using the correct page objects and methods to interact with the UI and the correct assertions to verify the expected behavior.
tests/pw/tests/e2e/order-min-max/min-max-03.spec.ts (2)
111-132: LGTM!The test case for validating the maximum quantity limit is well-written and provides good coverage. The sequence of steps is clear, and the assertions verify the expected behavior accurately.
134-155: LGTM!The test case for validating the minimum quantity limit is well-written and provides good coverage. The steps are clear, and the assertions accurately verify the expected error messages when the minimum quantity is not met.
| test.only('Cart total should not be less than minimum amount limit', { tag: ['@lite', '@admin'] }, async () => { | ||
| // vendor | ||
| await vendorDashboardSidebarPage.clickOnProductsTab(); | ||
| await vendorProductListPage.clickOnProductWithTitle(productName); | ||
| await vendorProductAddEditPage.selectProductStatus('publish'); | ||
| await vendorProductAddEditPage.clickOnSaveProduct(); | ||
|
|
||
| await vendorDashboardSidebarPage.clickOnSettingsTab(); | ||
| await storeSettingsPage.enterMinimumOrderAmount('30'); | ||
| await storeSettingsPage.clickOnUpdateSettingsButton(); | ||
|
|
||
| // customer | ||
| await customerPage.goto(baseUrl + '/shop/'); | ||
| await shopPage.clickOnProductWithTitle(productName); | ||
| await singleProductPage.enterQuantityValue(productName, '2'); | ||
| await singleProductPage.clickOnAddToCartButton(); | ||
| await customerPage.goto(baseUrl + '/cart/'); | ||
| await storefrontMainMenu.clickOnCartContentLink(); | ||
|
|
||
| const woocommerceError = await cartPage.woocommerceErrorMessage().textContent(); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(woocommerceError?.trim()).toEqual(`Minimum required cart amount for ${storeName} is $30.00. You currently have $20.00 in cart.`); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Test case looks good, but remove test.only before merging.
The test case for validating the minimum order amount is well-written and covers an important scenario. The steps are clear, and the assertion accurately verifies the expected error message when the minimum order amount is not met.
However, the use of test.only is not recommended as it prevents other test cases from running. Please remove test.only before merging this PR.
Do you want me to remove test.only for you? I can submit a PR with the fix.
All Submissions:
Changes proposed in this Pull Request:
Related Pull Request(s)
Closes
How to test the changes in this Pull Request:
Changelog entry
Title
Detailed Description of the pull request. What was previous behaviour
and what will be changed in this PR.
Before Changes
Describe the issue before changes with screenshots(s).
After Changes
Describe the issue after changes with screenshot(s).
Feature Video (optional)
Link of detailed video if this PR is for a feature.
PR Self Review Checklist:
FOR PR REVIEWER ONLY:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation