Add InvalidAgent #527
Add InvalidAgent #527
Conversation
WalkthroughA new class named Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
prediction_market_agent/run_agent.py (2)
84-84: Consider renaming 'invalid' for clarity.The addition of 'invalid' to the RunnableAgent enum is consistent with the existing structure. However, the name 'invalid' might be misleading as it suggests an error state rather than a valid agent type.
Consider renaming 'invalid' to something more descriptive of the agent's purpose, such as 'validity_checker' or 'market_validator'.
111-111: LGTM: InvalidAgent added to RUNNABLE_AGENTS. Consider maintaining alphabetical order.The addition of InvalidAgent to the RUNNABLE_AGENTS dictionary is correct and consistent with the existing structure. However, to maintain code organization:
Consider moving this entry to maintain alphabetical order within the RUNNABLE_AGENTS dictionary. It should be placed between the 'omen_cleaner' and 'prophet_gpt4' entries.
prediction_market_agent/agents/invalid_agent/deploy.py (2)
18-18: Consider using a more appropriate exception typeInstead of raising a
RuntimeErrorwhen the market type is not Omen, consider usingValueErrorto indicate that an inappropriate value was provided.Apply this diff:
- raise RuntimeError("This agent works only on Omen markets.") + raise ValueError("This agent works only on Omen markets.")
39-39: Improve readability of the reasoning stringThe reasoning string is lengthy and can be reformatted for better readability.
Apply this diff:
- reasoning="This market has been assessed as invalid, thus a probability of 0.5 is predicted. The Kelly strategy will opt for the less expensive outcome, adjusting the probability to 0.5, which is anticipated to be the final resolution where all outcome tokens hold equal value.", + reasoning=( + "This market has been assessed as invalid, thus a probability of 0.5 is predicted. " + "The Kelly strategy will opt for the less expensive outcome, adjusting the probability to 0.5, " + "which is anticipated to be the final resolution where all outcome tokens hold equal value." + ),
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- prediction_market_agent/agents/invalid_agent/deploy.py (1 hunks)
- prediction_market_agent/run_agent.py (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
prediction_market_agent/run_agent.py (2)
16-16: LGTM: Import statement for InvalidAgent.The import statement for
InvalidAgentis correctly formatted and follows the existing import style in the file.
Line range hint
1-126: Verify the implementation of InvalidAgent.The changes to include InvalidAgent in this file look good. However, it's important to ensure that the InvalidAgent class is correctly implemented in its own file.
Please run the following script to verify the InvalidAgent implementation:
✅ Verification successful
InvalidAgent implementation verified successfully.
No issues found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of InvalidAgent # Test: Check if InvalidAgent file exists and contains necessary methods fd -t f "invalid_agent" | xargs grep -H -E "class InvalidAgent|def verify_market|def get_betting_strategy|def answer_binary_market" # Test: Verify that InvalidAgent extends DeployableTraderAgent fd -t f "invalid_agent" | xargs grep -H "class InvalidAgent(DeployableTraderAgent):"Length of output: 216
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Broadly search for InvalidAgent implementation # Search for any file containing 'invalid' and 'agent' in the filename fd -t f "invalid.*agent" # Search for the InvalidAgent class without assuming inheritance ast-grep --pattern $'class InvalidAgent { $$$ }'Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive search for InvalidAgent implementation # Search for any class containing both 'Invalid' and 'Agent' in the class name, case-insensitive rg -i "class\s+\w*Invalid\w*Agent\w*\(" # Search for classes extending any Deployable agent ast-grep --pattern $'class $_ extends Deployable$_Agent { $$$ }'Length of output: 205
prediction_market_agent/agents/invalid_agent/deploy.py (4)
13-15: Class definition is appropriateThe
InvalidAgentclass correctly inherits fromDeployableTraderAgentand setsbet_on_n_markets_per_runto 10.
16-30: Implementation ofverify_marketmethod is soundThe
verify_marketmethod appropriately:
- Ensures the agent operates only on Omen markets.
- Checks if the agent has recently bet on the market to avoid redundant actions.
- Avoids betting on markets with low potential profit due to low invalidity potential.
- Determines market invalidity using
is_invalid(market.question).
31-34:get_betting_strategymethod implementation is appropriateThe method returns a
KellyBettingStrategywith a maximum bet amount of 5, aligning with the agent's intended strategy.
35-40:answer_binary_marketmethod correctly assesses invalid marketsThe method returns a
ProbabilisticAnswerwith a confidence of 1.0 and ap_yesof 0.5, which is appropriate for invalid markets where outcomes are equally uncertain.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Currently there is one invalid market live:
Will JD Vance be publicly accused of a sex crime before October 15? with p_yes 19%.