Skip to content

Issues: harp-tech/protocol

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

32 Open 3 Closed
32 Open 3 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Clarify R_TIMESTAMP_OFFSET behavior documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
#64 opened Dec 19, 2024 by bruno-f-cruz
Add support for errors in harp core proposal Request for a new feature
#63 opened Dec 19, 2024 by bruno-f-cruz
1 of 4 tasks
Atxmega core devices are not synchronized to harp synchronization specification bug Something isn't working
#62 opened Nov 29, 2024 by bruno-f-cruz
Consider using packet diagrams to describe register contents proposal Request for a new feature
#60 opened Nov 14, 2024 by glopesdev
Improve documentation for timestamps
#59 opened Nov 5, 2024 by AlexandreLaborde
Register WRITE Reply Behavior for Slow Routines proposal Request for a new feature
#58 opened Nov 1, 2024 by Poofjunior
1 of 4 tasks
1
MUTE_RPL Behavior on Write Errors
#55 opened Sep 11, 2024 by bruno-f-cruz
Critical synchronization bug results into going back in time bug Something isn't working
#48 opened May 8, 2024 by bruno-f-cruz
@glopesdev @bruno-f-cruz @filcarv
6
Inconsistency in terminology between common registers and protocol specification bug Something isn't working
#47 opened Apr 9, 2024 by glopesdev
Refactor Version registers proposal Request for a new feature
#44 opened Mar 24, 2024 by bruno-f-cruz
1 of 4 tasks
3
Add implementation information to device schema proposal Request for a new feature
#43 opened Mar 24, 2024 by bruno-f-cruz
1 of 4 tasks
1
Consider defining an upper command rate limit from interface to device proposal Request for a new feature
#42 opened Mar 23, 2024 by bruno-f-cruz
1 of 4 tasks
Define a data logging/ingestion format and spec proposal Request for a new feature
#41 opened Mar 19, 2024 by bruno-f-cruz
4
Heterogenous register types in yaml schema
#40 opened Mar 7, 2024 by bruno-f-cruz
Require timestamp sequence to be monotonic when device is synchronized proposal Request for a new feature
#37 opened Feb 27, 2024 by glopesdev
1 of 4 tasks
7
Implicit (error) state should be represented in a queriable register proposal Request for a new feature
#32 opened Dec 22, 2023 by Poofjunior
1 of 4 tasks
Increase the size of the R_SERIAL_NUMBER to match 128bit UUID proposal Request for a new feature under review An issue that is undergoing pr review
#31 opened Dec 21, 2023 by bruno-f-cruz
1 of 4 tasks
1
@bruno-f-cruz
4
Sequential Register Writing/Reading
#30 opened Dec 21, 2023 by bruno-f-cruz
USB VID/PID Specs for devices that support Native USB
#29 opened Dec 21, 2023 by bruno-f-cruz
2
Discourage register polymorphic behavior documentation Improvements or additions to documentation proposal Request for a new feature
#26 opened Dec 21, 2023 by bruno-f-cruz
1 of 4 tasks
1
3
Expose demultiplexed boolean properties for DIO registers proposal Request for a new feature
#25 opened Dec 20, 2023 by glopesdev
1 of 4 tasks
2
Consider standardizing trigger for Bootloader mode under testing Someone is having testing this feature
#18 opened Dec 8, 2023 by bruno-f-cruz
5
Firmware Git Hash under review An issue that is undergoing pr review under testing Someone is having testing this feature
#17 opened Dec 8, 2023 by bruno-f-cruz
1
@bruno-f-cruz
4
Message protocol enhancements for scheduled execution proposal Request for a new feature
#15 opened Dec 8, 2023 by glopesdev
2 of 4 tasks
9
Consider defining the DTR pin state as part of the protocol standard under review An issue that is undergoing pr review under testing Someone is having testing this feature
#14 opened Dec 6, 2023 by bruno-f-cruz
1
@bruno-f-cruz
4
ProTip! Add no:assignee to see everything that’s not assigned.