Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update npm package json-schema-to-typescript to v15 #5046

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024

Conversation

hash-worker[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker bot commented Sep 10, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
json-schema-to-typescript dependencies major 11.0.5 -> 15.0.3

Release Notes

bcherny/json-schema-to-typescript (json-schema-to-typescript)

v15.0.3

Compare Source

v15.0.2

Compare Source

v15.0.1

Compare Source

v15.0.0

Compare Source

  • 62cc052 Fixed bug where intersection schemas didn't generate complete types. Improved output readability for intersection types (#​603)

v14.1.0

Compare Source

v14.0.5

Compare Source

v14.0.4

Compare Source

v14.0.3

Compare Source

v14.0.2

Compare Source

v14.0.1

Compare Source

v14.0.0

Compare Source

v13.1.2

Compare Source

v13.1.1

Compare Source

v13.1.0

Compare Source

  • f797848 Feat: Add support for deprecated keyword

v13.0.1

v13.0.0

  • 05b0103 Bugfix: Parse boolean schemas as schemas, rather than as literals (#​515)
  • 8f973d1 Bugfix: Fix edge case where emitted names were corrupted when using strictIndexSignature (#​423)

v12.0.0

Compare Source

  • b73e1c7 Bugfix: Parse enums as literals, rather than as schemas (#​508)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@github-actions github-actions bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) labels Sep 10, 2024
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Sep 10, 2024
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Sep 14, 2024
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Sep 24, 2024
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Sep 27, 2024
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/json-schema-to-typescript-15.x branch from 5cd06f3 to b250ee2 Compare December 13, 2024 13:44
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Dec 13, 2024
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/json-schema-to-typescript-15.x branch from b250ee2 to c243de6 Compare December 14, 2024 01:39
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Dec 14, 2024
@hash-worker
Copy link
Contributor Author

hash-worker bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

Copy link
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 205 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-29.186 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 198 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.544 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.024 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.195 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.918 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 210 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$17.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 225 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-30.438 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-25.645 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$68.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 383 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.160 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$40.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 157 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.451 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$58.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 214 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.850 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$45.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 335 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.194 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$50.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.430 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$54.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 286 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.218 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 323 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.098 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$40.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 226 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.218 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$95.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 376 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.772 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$80.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 368 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.187 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$87.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.232 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$92.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 413 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579 $$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.92 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.626 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 50 entities $$5.34 \mathrm{s} \pm 537 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}1911 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$26.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 232 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.859 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$20.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.631 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$55.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.31 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-3.811 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$176 \mathrm{ms} \pm 499 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.174 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$1.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.70 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.326 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$2.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.87 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$1.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.58 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.065 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.202 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$9.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 157 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-28.690 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 50 entities $$3.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-20.630 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.188 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$1.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.85 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.546 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$2.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.39 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.104 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$3.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

@vilkinsons vilkinsons requested a review from CiaranMn December 18, 2024 15:45
@vilkinsons
Copy link
Member

FYI @CiaranMn Bilal has kindly readied this PR for review.

@vilkinsons vilkinsons marked this pull request as ready for review December 18, 2024 15:46
@CiaranMn CiaranMn added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 18, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 60e2a5a Dec 18, 2024
166 checks passed
@CiaranMn CiaranMn deleted the deps/js/json-schema-to-typescript-15.x branch December 18, 2024 16:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area)
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants