Update npm package @types/express to v5

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
@types/express (source)	resolutions	major	4.17.21 -> 5.0.0

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[CiaranMn]

This should be updated along with express itself

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 21.72%. Comparing base (faf8281) to head (aba6ea8).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5970   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   21.72%   21.72%           
=======================================
  Files         566      566           
  Lines       19157    19156    -1     
  Branches     2755     2755           
=======================================
  Hits         4162     4162           
+ Misses      14943    14942    -1     
  Partials       52       52           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	1.16% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	46.42% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	50.17% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	8.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	58.62% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.98% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
local.hash-subgraph	24.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer	6.66% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	88.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$17.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 200 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-24.529 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 185 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.519 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 188 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.397 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 213 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 224 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.002 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 162 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-29.268 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 243 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$69.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 374 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$40.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.252 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$59.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$45.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 138 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$51.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.028 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$55.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 325 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.997 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 281 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.284 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$41.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 183 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$97.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 786 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.858 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$82.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 615 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$90.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 416 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$94.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 667 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$2.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.88 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.794 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.35 \mathrm{s} \pm 535 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}1885 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$27.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 105 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 119 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$57.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 328 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}81.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$178 \mathrm{ms} \pm 638 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.370 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.68 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.459 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.44 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.702 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.63 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.661 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.314 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$9.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 158 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.77 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.434 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.60 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.350 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.511 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.586 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph