Update Rust crate itertools to 0.14.0

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
itertools	workspace.dependencies	minor	0.13.0 -> 0.14.0

---

Release Notes

rust-itertools/itertools (itertools)

v0.14.0

Compare Source

Breaking

• Increased MSRV to 1.63.0 (#​960)
• Removed generic parameter from cons_tuples (#​988)

Added

• Added array_combinations (#​991)
• Added k_smallest_relaxed and variants (#​925)
• Added next_array and collect_array (#​560)
• Implemented DoubleEndedIterator for FilterOk (#​948)
• Implemented DoubleEndedIterator for FilterMapOk (#​950)

Changed

• Allow Q: ?Sized in Itertools::contains (#​971)
• Improved hygiene of chain! (#​943)
• Improved into_group_map_by documentation (#​1000)
• Improved tree_reduce documentation (#​955)
• Improved discoverability of merge_join_by (#​966)
• Improved discoverability of take_while_inclusive (#​972)
• Improved documentation of find_or_last and find_or_first (#​984)
• Prevented exponentially large type sizes in tuple_combinations (#​945)
• Added track_caller attr for asser_equal (#​976)

Notable Internal Changes

• Fixed clippy lints (#​956, #​987, #​1008)
• Addressed warnings within doctests (#​964)
• CI: Run most tests with miri (#​961)
• CI: Speed up "cargo-semver-checks" action (#​938)
• Changed an instance of default_features in Cargo.toml to default-features (#​985)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[hash-worker]

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

• any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
• the branch becomes conflicted, or
• you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
• you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: Cargo.lock

Command failed: cargo update --config net.git-fetch-with-cli=true --manifest-path Cargo.toml --package [email protected] --precise 0.14.0
    Updating crates.io index
error: failed to select a version for the requirement `itertools = "^0.13"`
candidate versions found which didn't match: 0.14.0
location searched: crates.io index
required by package `test-fuzz-macro v7.0.1`
    ... which satisfies dependency `test-fuzz-macro = "=7.0.1"` (locked to 7.0.1) of package `test-fuzz v7.0.1`
    ... which satisfies dependency `test-fuzz = "=7.0.1"` (locked to 7.0.1) of package `hql-syntax-jexpr v0.0.0 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/hashintel/hash/libs/@local/hql/syntax-jexpr)`

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 202 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-28.819 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 173 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.407 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 161 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.832 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 206 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$15.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.064 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 144 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.765 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.059 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 190 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-30.189 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$68.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 455 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.025 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$40.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 247 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.472 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$58.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 311 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.366 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$44.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.194 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$50.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 301 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.773 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$54.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 254 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.736 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 522 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.117 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$39.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 282 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.852 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$95.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 400 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.032 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$78.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 316 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.473 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$86.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 405 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.184 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$91.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 379 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.255 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$2.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.71 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.105 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.37 \mathrm{s} \pm 538 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.021 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$27.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 219 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.466 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$57.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 226 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.264 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$84.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 379 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-51.961 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.15 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.852 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.83 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.377 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.02 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.133 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$9.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 139 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.696 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.052 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.19 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.222 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.74 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.305 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.29 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.334 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.565 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph