Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enrich records with rvk from callNumber #2101

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

TobiasNx
Copy link
Contributor

@TobiasNx TobiasNx commented Nov 27, 2024

This is a draft enriching records with rvk from callNumbers. The idea was suggested by @frauhollunder.

@maipet maybe you can have a look at this. If this makes sense.

@@ -83,6 +83,14 @@
"type" : [ "Work" ]
},
"extent" : "2 CD : DDD + Beih.",
"subject" : [ {
"notation" : "CD 2410",
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems to be wrong.

@@ -91,6 +91,21 @@
} ],
"extent" : "1 Partitur (12 Seiten)",
"note" : [ "Hier auch später erschienene, unveränderte Nachdrucke" ],
"subject" : [ {
"notation" : "NV 102",
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Keine RVK scheinbar

"id" : "https://d-nb.info/gnd/4449787-8"
}
}, {
"notation" : "NB 2023",
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No rvk notation

@@ -245,6 +245,13 @@
"id" : "https://d-nb.info/gnd/4181939-1",
"gndIdentifier" : "4181939-1"
} ]
}, {
"notation" : "MS 6020",
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems correct.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With my last adjustment of the regex this is dropped now. Since the signature is not validly build after RVK Signatur rules: https://rvk.uni-regensburg.de/images/stories/fruit/sigreg/regeln_fr_die_signaturvergabe_version_2012_02_17.pdf

@TobiasNx TobiasNx marked this pull request as draft November 28, 2024 13:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant