Backport merged Pull Request

[mtar]

Due Diligence

• General:
  • base branch must be main for new features, latest release branch (e.g. release/1.3.x) for bug fixes
  • title of the PR is suitable to appear in the Release Notes
• Implementation:
  • unit tests: all split configurations tested
  • unit tests: multiple dtypes tested
  • documentation updated where needed

Description

This PR introduces an action workflow that allows to port merged Pull Requests to other branches. See action

replaces: #1189

Changes proposed:

• add backport workflow using action

Type of change

workflow

Memory requirements

Performance

Does this change modify the behaviour of other functions? If so, which?

no

[ghost]

👇 Click on the image for a new way to code review

Legend

[github-actions]

Thank you for the PR!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (31d0752) 91.75% compared to head (953ca52) 91.84%.

❗ Current head 953ca52 differs from pull request most recent head 7c7bcb9. Consider uploading reports for the commit 7c7bcb9 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1333      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.75%   91.84%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          79       79              
  Lines       11502    11464      -38     
==========================================
- Hits        10554    10529      -25     
+ Misses        948      935      -13     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	91.84% <ø> (+0.08%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mrfh92]

Cool 👍

[github-actions]

Thank you for the PR!

[github-actions]

Thank you for the PR!

[ClaudiaComito]

Great, thanks @mtar !