Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch to the new "component" vs "composite" buildpack terminology #682

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 21, 2023

Conversation

edmorley
Copy link
Member

Upstream has now officially defined names for what we had previously been calling meta-buildpacks vs single buildpacks: https://github.com/buildpacks/spec/blob/main/buildpack.md#cnb-terminology

All types, docs and internal functions have been renamed to match.

Fixes #639.
GUS-W-14161652.

CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@edmorley edmorley marked this pull request as ready for review September 21, 2023 14:10
@edmorley edmorley requested a review from a team as a code owner September 21, 2023 14:10
Upstream has now officially defined names for what we had previously
been calling meta-buildpacks vs single buildpacks:
https://github.com/buildpacks/spec/blob/main/buildpack.md#cnb-terminology

All types, docs and internal functions have been renamed to match.

Fixes #639.
GUS-W-14161652.
@edmorley edmorley merged commit 3503772 into main Sep 21, 2023
5 checks passed
@edmorley edmorley deleted the edmorley/use-composite-component-terminology branch September 21, 2023 15:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Buildpack descriptor naming differs from spec
3 participants