Migrate inventory code #861
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Copy all files currently living in https://github.com/Malax/inventory/tree/main/inventory/src without any changes. Co-Authored-By: Manuel Fuchs <[email protected]> Co-Authored-By: Josh W Lewis <[email protected]>
runesoerensen
force-pushed
the
migrate-inventory-code
branch
from
0c039db to
1e47371
Compare
runesoerensen
force-pushed
the
migrate-inventory-code
branch
from
1e47371 to
8c99bc5
Compare
We may want to consider another approach here (e.g. naming the feature `inventory-sha2` and/or pulling in the inventory dependency ["inventory", "dep:sha2"]). While the crate will be pulled in if a user enables the `sha2`, the inventory-specific sha2 code won't be compiled unless the `inventory` feature is also enabled.
runesoerensen
force-pushed
the
migrate-inventory-code
branch
from
8c99bc5 to
99d7d3a
Compare
These re-exports appear to be unnecessary, and doesn't have any impact on code that rely on the `inventory` module (and have the `semver` and/or `sha2` features enabled). Also see related prior discussion here Malax/inventory#2 (comment). The `semver` and `sha2` modules only contain implementations of public traits, so I don't think we need to re-export those (unlike bringing for instance a function or struct in to scope). If I understand how trait implementations work correctly, it doesn't matter where an implementation lives (only the visibility of the trait and the type it's implemented for is relevant) - in other words, the implementation will be available to any code that can access both the trait and the type, even across crate binaries.
runesoerensen
force-pushed
the
migrate-inventory-code
branch
from
e41dc7a to
369a70f
Compare
This was referenced Sep 24, 2024
joshwlewis
reviewed
Sep 26, 2024
Malax
requested changes
Sep 27, 2024
|
There's a few comments on docs. I took a stab at it in a stacked PR #864. Feedback/review is welcome over there or it's free to be merged in here and iterated on. The only known pending thing is i put the feature names in the docs as TODO. |
* Add module docs and example * Document resolve and partial_resolve * Document more inventory methods * Document Artifact * Document ArtifactRequirement I also suggest we change the name of `inventory/version` to `inventory/artifact_requirement.rs` or `requirement.rs`. * Update example to compare Checksum instead of string * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Rune Soerensen <[email protected]> * Update feature names * Rewrite example usage * Show how to display checksum in example --------- Co-authored-by: Rune Soerensen <[email protected]>
|
@joshwlewis I've merged Richard's documentation PR - I think should address your documentation comments? |
joshwlewis
approved these changes
Oct 15, 2024
|
@Malax I think this is waiting on you now. It looks like the changes you requested have been made. Can we get a 👍🏻? |
Malax
approved these changes
Oct 16, 2024
This was referenced Oct 17, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR imports and migrates the inventory code here to the
libherokubuildpackcrate. The code was copied as-is and added in the first commit, and I've tried to keep changes to integrate it to a minimum.I'm not sure what the best approach is to adapt the
sha2andsemverfeature flags from the source inventory crate - perhaps it's fine as-is, or perhaps it'd make sense to use different feature names given the new context/crate for the code. Relevant commit with comment.I've removed a couple re-exports that appear to be unnecessary - see explanation in this commit.