Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hacky solana balance monitoring #3432

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

tkporter
Copy link
Collaborator

@tkporter tkporter commented Mar 18, 2024

Description

  • See https://github.com/hyperlane-xyz/issues/issues/1047
  • Intentionally going with a "hacky" short term approach because we consistently hit this, we're unlikely to prioritize a better solution for v3, and this change is only for v2 which we are in maintenance-only mode, so it's ok to hardcode these accounts

Drive-by changes

  • New monorepo base image to fix building, which requires node 18 apparently

Related issues

Backward compatibility

Testing

@tkporter tkporter requested a review from nambrot as a code owner March 18, 2024 10:58
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Mar 18, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 3f5e27a

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 18, 2024

Codecov Report

Merging #3432 (3f5e27a) into v2 (e8b7da2) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##               v2    #3432   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   67.91%   67.91%           
=======================================
  Files          95       95           
  Lines        1446     1446           
  Branches      189      189           
=======================================
  Hits          982      982           
  Misses        457      457           
  Partials        7        7           
Components Coverage Δ
core 94.82% <ø> (ø)
hooks 38.46% <ø> (ø)
isms 67.48% <ø> (ø)
token ∅ <ø> (∅)
middlewares 62.93% <ø> (ø)

@tkporter tkporter merged commit f0551b6 into v2 Mar 18, 2024
27 of 30 checks passed
@tkporter tkporter deleted the trevor/hacky-solana-balance-monitoring branch March 18, 2024 17:32
daniel-savu pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2024
### Description

- See hyperlane-xyz/issues#1047
- Intentionally going with a "hacky" short term approach because we
consistently hit this, we're unlikely to prioritize a better solution
for v3, and this change is only for v2 which we are in maintenance-only
mode, so it's ok to hardcode these accounts

### Drive-by changes

- New monorepo base image to fix building, which requires node 18
apparently

### Related issues

<!--
- Fixes #[issue number here]
-->

### Backward compatibility

<!--
Are these changes backward compatible? Are there any infrastructure
implications, e.g. changes that would prohibit deploying older commits
using this infra tooling?

Yes/No
-->

### Testing

<!--
What kind of testing have these changes undergone?

None/Manual/Unit Tests
-->
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2024
### Description

- Tested and set up alerts
- We already have the relayer balances from the agents themselves, so
just need the ATA payers (which are responsible for paying for the rent
of token accounts that don't yet exist when bridging in)
- Putting it here because it's easy and this is what we did in v2 (see
#3432, which this is based off)

### Drive-by changes

<!--
Are there any minor or drive-by changes also included?
-->

### Related issues

<!--
- Fixes #[issue number here]
-->

### Backward compatibility

<!--
Are these changes backward compatible? Are there any infrastructure
implications, e.g. changes that would prohibit deploying older commits
using this infra tooling?

Yes/No
-->

### Testing

<!--
What kind of testing have these changes undergone?

None/Manual/Unit Tests
-->

---------

Co-authored-by: Paul Balaji <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants