-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 390
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hacky solana balance monitoring #3432
Conversation
|
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## v2 #3432 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 67.91% 67.91%
=======================================
Files 95 95
Lines 1446 1446
Branches 189 189
=======================================
Hits 982 982
Misses 457 457
Partials 7 7
|
### Description - See hyperlane-xyz/issues#1047 - Intentionally going with a "hacky" short term approach because we consistently hit this, we're unlikely to prioritize a better solution for v3, and this change is only for v2 which we are in maintenance-only mode, so it's ok to hardcode these accounts ### Drive-by changes - New monorepo base image to fix building, which requires node 18 apparently ### Related issues <!-- - Fixes #[issue number here] --> ### Backward compatibility <!-- Are these changes backward compatible? Are there any infrastructure implications, e.g. changes that would prohibit deploying older commits using this infra tooling? Yes/No --> ### Testing <!-- What kind of testing have these changes undergone? None/Manual/Unit Tests -->
### Description - Tested and set up alerts - We already have the relayer balances from the agents themselves, so just need the ATA payers (which are responsible for paying for the rent of token accounts that don't yet exist when bridging in) - Putting it here because it's easy and this is what we did in v2 (see #3432, which this is based off) ### Drive-by changes <!-- Are there any minor or drive-by changes also included? --> ### Related issues <!-- - Fixes #[issue number here] --> ### Backward compatibility <!-- Are these changes backward compatible? Are there any infrastructure implications, e.g. changes that would prohibit deploying older commits using this infra tooling? Yes/No --> ### Testing <!-- What kind of testing have these changes undergone? None/Manual/Unit Tests --> --------- Co-authored-by: Paul Balaji <[email protected]>
Description
Drive-by changes
Related issues
Backward compatibility
Testing