Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[refactor] #2118: WIP: Default config #2583

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ilchu
Copy link
Contributor

@ilchu ilchu commented Aug 2, 2022

Signed-off-by: Ilia Churin [email protected]

Description of the Change

  • A new trait Combine in iroha_config_base::proxy and its corresponding error
  • Refactor iroha_config_base::derive crate into modules
  • Proxy derive macro
  • Deeper refactor of Configurable trait to make it more readable
  • Make Proxy completely conform to Configurable and implement all its methods
  • Placeholder trait DocsDefault to make kagami work for the time being

All of these changes won't probably go into a final real PR (quite likely nothing in its current form besides the crate refactor), so instead this draft may serve as a ground for comments that can become guidelines for my future work. Moreover, the code doesn't even compile at the time of writing due to the unfinished point 5 from the list above.

Issue

Was part of work towards #2118, but in a discussion with @appetrosyan it was decided to make it an epic and split it into more smaller ones to make the progress more trackable.

The epic for tracking: #2585.

Benefits

Ideally, the end result should not only allow flexible loading of configuration, but also give informative messages/suggestions in case of failure. E.g. if no keys were provided, suggest a command to generate them (or have a flag for generation on the fly). Moreover, it wouldn't hurt if at start Iroha logs explicitly, which parts of configs are loaded as default values due to them not being provided.

Possible Drawbacks

Current design of Configurable trait suffers from interface multiplicity, that is, it serves two functions at once which should eventually be decoupled: things pertaining to configuration loading and initialization, and all the things related to querying it or modifying parameters at runtime.

Alternate Designs

Not necessarily alternate designs, but a few things mentioned in previous discussion:

  • To save space, some of the values in config proxies could be stored as ConstStr.
  • Typechecking in procedural macros. This is more of a general issue relating to all our macro work. Instead of trying to naively check some AST node ident against a string, it would make sense to have a small function that's part of the macro expansion doing this job.
  • Despite all of the fields in ConfigProxy being wrapped in Option to signify the possibility of them being uninitialized, there are some fields which have to be initialized eventually, and those that don't and can instead rely on the default value. This distinction could be marked by having a separate struct for the non-defaultable option fields.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the iroha2-dev The re-implementation of a BFT hyperledger in RUST label Aug 2, 2022
@ilchu ilchu changed the title [#2118]: WIP: Default config [refactor] #2118: WIP: Default config Aug 2, 2022
/// from the length of the array in
/// [`self.sumeragi.trusted_peers.peers`], most likely due to two
/// (or more) peers having the same public key.
fn from_path<P: AsRef<Path> + Debug + Clone>(path: P) -> eyre::Result<Self, eyre::Error> {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't know how robust it is to try to make a default from_path method for all proxy structs, but there definitely is some space for improvement in existing code, as we have 3 or 4 implementations of almost the same function scattered as impl Configuration here and there.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be a separate trait. I'd say LoadFromDisk and make it a little richer.

@@ -209,7 +210,7 @@ mod docs {

use super::*;

impl<E: Debug, C: Configurable<Error = E> + Send + Sync + Default> PrintDocs for C {}
impl<E: Debug, C: Configurable<Error = E> + Send + Sync + DocsDefault> PrintDocs for C {}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seemed to work as a stopgap when we take away the #[serde(default)] on config structs, but we need something more sophisticated here. That would be done at a later stage.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Create a ticket, reference in // TODO.

.wrap_err(format!("Failed to deserialize json {:?} from reader", path))
}

// fn finalize(&mut self) -> Result<()> {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left commented code here as it marks an important point: even with the public/private keys being most important non-defaultable config parameters, they probably don't need to be specified in all the overlapping structures. I.e. it could always be enough to specify it either in torii or iroha config only, and then propagate it into the empty one. Something evolved from this func could be a mechanism to help that.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. I'd add this to the front of the PR and to the description of the ticket that fixes it.

Also consider making it a doc-test.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we should consider making keys it's own thing and then pass independently to parts of system that reqiures them?
Like we have Secrets and ConfigMaps in k8s.

Comment on lines +88 to +93
} else if is_option {
quote! {
#l_value = Some(serde_json::from_value(var.into())
.map_err(|e| iroha_config_base::derive::Error::field_error(stringify!(#ident), e))?)
}
}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This code path should get run when deriving Configurable for our Proxy structs.

Comment on lines +107 to +113
quote! {
// <#inner>::load_environment()?;
#l_value.unwrap().load_environment()?;
// if let Ok(config) = <#inner>::load_environment() {
// #l_value = Some(config)
// };
}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

An unfinished mess here as the whole Configurable trait is not implemented yet for proxy and I wasn't able to test this piece. What gets done to load the inner configuration of fields wrapped inside Option still needs to be thought through.

@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ use std::{panic, path::PathBuf, sync::Arc};

use color_eyre::eyre::{eyre, Result, WrapErr};
use iroha_actor::{broker::*, prelude::*};
use iroha_config::iroha::Configuration;
use iroha_config::base::proxy::DocsDefault;
use iroha_config::iroha::{Configuration, ConfigurationProxy};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
use iroha_config::iroha::{Configuration, ConfigurationProxy};
use iroha_config::iroha::{Configuration, ConfigurableProxy};

@@ -209,7 +210,7 @@ mod docs {

use super::*;

impl<E: Debug, C: Configurable<Error = E> + Send + Sync + Default> PrintDocs for C {}
impl<E: Debug, C: Configurable<Error = E> + Send + Sync + DocsDefault> PrintDocs for C {}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Create a ticket, reference in // TODO.

@@ -53,7 +54,7 @@ view! {
}
}

impl Default for Configuration {
impl DocsDefault for Configuration {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not a huge fan of DocsDefault for a trait name. Maybe ReferenceDefault? ExampleDefault?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, the point is that we shouldn't allow people anything resembling a Default trait. The point is to prevent this kind of usage, which we can achieve by

  1. enforcing that the default is either implemented only for the proxy structure, and no concrete Configuration impl Default which we can check.
  2. By encoding the default values in place where they're used. So there isn't a general Default trait, just an example struct instance.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe something like trait Example with method fn example() -> Self?

use super::*;

/// Pseudo-default trait only used for doc generation
pub trait DocsDefault {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Which is very much the exact same thing as Default, can be used in the same way, and people will probably abuse in the same way.

We need to get rid not only of core::Default but also of any trait that can be used like it. Adding a DocsDefault trait in the exact same spot doesn't solve anything.

config/base/src/lib.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
/// from the length of the array in
/// [`self.sumeragi.trusted_peers.peers`], most likely due to two
/// (or more) peers having the same public key.
fn from_path<P: AsRef<Path> + Debug + Clone>(path: P) -> eyre::Result<Self, eyre::Error> {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be a separate trait. I'd say LoadFromDisk and make it a little richer.

.wrap_err(format!("Failed to deserialize json {:?} from reader", path))
}

// fn finalize(&mut self) -> Result<()> {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. I'd add this to the front of the PR and to the description of the ticket that fixes it.

Also consider making it a doc-test.

.wrap_err(format!("Failed to deserialize json {:?} from reader", path))
}

// fn finalize(&mut self) -> Result<()> {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// fn finalize(&mut self) -> Result<()> {
// fn finish(&mut self) -> Result<()> {

"-ize" in names can confuse users. Rust uses the "-ize" in all of its docs. Our compny policy is to use "-ise". To avoid confusion, use a word that has neither.

config/base/src/lib.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ impl Configuration {
AccountId::from_str("alice@wonderland").expect("Account ID not valid")
}

// TODO: Delete this?
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just remember to do it.

cli/src/samples.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
config/base/src/lib.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
.wrap_err(format!("Failed to deserialize json {:?} from reader", path))
}

// fn finalize(&mut self) -> Result<()> {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we should consider making keys it's own thing and then pass independently to parts of system that reqiures them?
Like we have Secrets and ConfigMaps in k8s.

@@ -13,6 +15,7 @@ pub mod derive {
/// View contains a subset of the fields that the type has.
///
/// Works only with structs.
// TODO: alter as won't be true after yeeting [`Default`]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I belive that we already can drop Default requirement and remove part of macro that produce Default for View.
Since we have only one way conversation Config -> View.

@@ -53,7 +54,7 @@ view! {
}
}

impl Default for Configuration {
impl DocsDefault for Configuration {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe something like trait Example with method fn example() -> Self?

config/base/derive/src/proxy.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
config/base/derive/src/proxy.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
config/base/derive/src/proxy.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
config/base/derive/src/proxy.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
quote! {
// <#inner>::load_environment()?;
#l_value.unwrap().load_environment()?;
// if let Ok(config) = <#inner>::load_environment() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#l_value = <#inner>::load_enviroment().ok()

@appetrosyan
Copy link
Contributor

I suggest closing this PR in favour of the real PRs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
iroha2-dev The re-implementation of a BFT hyperledger in RUST
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants