Updating UBI images #80
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Arthur De Magalhaes <[email protected]>
|
Hi @arthurdm, I think we added the user to go through the RH certification process and make it available in the RH catalog. Let me check if it is possible without that user. |
|
thanks @dinogun - I didn't know the UBI-min image was on the RH catalog. It would fail the non-root test if It doesn't look like UBI standard (Java) image is in the catalog (as per this page). Do you know if that UBI 8 standard IBM JRE will be uploaded there? If not, then we could update just that Dockerfile, and leave the UBI-min as it is? |
Signed-off-by: Arthur De Magalhaes <[email protected]>
|
@dinogun - I have updated the PR so that we only change the UBI standard image, which is not published to the RH catalog. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In order to be consistent with AdoptOpenJDK's UBI images, as well as the other published IBM Java images, I propose that we do not create user
1001in the UBI Java layer.This creates an issue in downstream images, such as Liberty, because we need to switch to
rootto do things likeyum install xyz(creating a larger image size), and requires us to keep different Dockerfiles from our AdoptOpenJDK-based ones (where we need to create user 1001 ourselves).