Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: introduce named-addresses #255

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 23, 2024
Merged

feat: introduce named-addresses #255

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 23, 2024

Conversation

beer-1
Copy link
Contributor

@beer-1 beer-1 commented Aug 23, 2024

Description

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

@beer-1 beer-1 self-assigned this Aug 23, 2024
@beer-1 beer-1 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 23, 2024 06:46
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 23, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The update includes a minor version increment of the LIBMOVEVM_VERSION in the Dockerfile from v0.4.2 to v0.4.3. In the move.go file, significant modifications were made, including the removal of the moveProveCmd function, restructuring type definitions, and renaming functions for better organization. A new flag for named addresses was introduced in the command-line interface, reflecting changes to the application's structure and usability.

Changes

Files Change Summary
Dockerfile Updated LIBMOVEVM_VERSION from v0.4.2 to v0.4.3.
cmd/move/move.go Removed moveProveCmd, consolidated types into a unified types package, renamed functions, and introduced flagNamedAddresses. Updated function signatures and arguments accordingly.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant CLI
    participant Compiler
    User->>CLI: Invoke Command with Named Addresses
    CLI->>Compiler: Parse and Validate Addresses
    Compiler-->>CLI: Return Configuration
    CLI-->>User: Display Results
Loading

🐰 "In the code where changes lay,
A rabbit hops to celebrate the day!
With functions redefined and paths anew,
We jump for joy, it's fresh and true!
A flag for names, a leap ahead,
In this world of code, we’re happily fed!" 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 23, 2024

Dependency Review

The following issues were found:
  • ✅ 0 vulnerable package(s)
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with incompatible licenses
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with invalid SPDX license definitions
  • ⚠️ 1 package(s) with unknown licenses.
See the Details below.

License Issues

go.mod

PackageVersionLicenseIssue Type
github.com/initia-labs/movevm0.4.3NullUnknown License
Denied Licenses: GPL-1.0-or-later, LGPL-2.0-or-later

OpenSSF Scorecard

PackageVersionScoreDetails
gomod/github.com/initia-labs/movevm 0.4.3 UnknownUnknown

Scanned Manifest Files

go.mod

Copy link
Contributor

@Vritra4 Vritra4 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@beer-1 beer-1 merged commit af972b4 into main Aug 23, 2024
8 checks passed
@beer-1 beer-1 deleted the feat/update-compiler-options branch August 23, 2024 06:59
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 40.62%. Comparing base (cfafc11) to head (e105fa7).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #255   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   40.62%   40.62%           
=======================================
  Files         264      264           
  Lines       25096    25096           
=======================================
  Hits        10195    10195           
  Misses      13329    13329           
  Partials     1572     1572           

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 18, 2024
11 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants