prepare initiation-2 upgrade #292
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@beer-1 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 56 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces substantial changes across multiple files, primarily enhancing the upgrade handling logic in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Dependency Review✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.OpenSSF Scorecard
Scanned Files |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
x/move/types/checksum.go (1)
7-9: Add documentation and input validation.
While the implementation is correct and secure using SHA-256, consider these improvements:
- Add godoc comments explaining the function's purpose and usage
- Add input validation for nil/empty byte slices
Consider this enhanced implementation:
+// ModuleBzToChecksum computes the SHA-256 checksum of the provided module bytes.
+// It is used to verify module integrity during the upgrade process.
func ModuleBzToChecksum(moduleBz []byte) [32]byte {
+ if len(moduleBz) == 0 {
+ panic("empty module bytes")
+ }
return sha256.Sum256(moduleBz)
}x/move/types/keys.go (1)
90-104: LGTM! Consider adding tests for new checksum functions.
The implementation is consistent with existing patterns and maintains proper error handling. The functions follow the same security properties by using proper address validation.
Consider adding tests to verify the behavior of these new functions, particularly:
- Key generation with various module names
- Error handling for invalid module names
- Collision checks with other key types
Would you like me to help generate test cases for these scenarios?
x/move/keeper/handler.go (1)
Line range hint 89-89: Enhance deprecation notices with timeline information
The deprecated functions (ExecuteEntryFunction, ExecuteScript, ExecuteViewFunction) should include:
- The version when they will be removed
- A migration guide or example of using the JSON alternatives
Consider updating the deprecation notices like this:
-// Deprecated: use ExecuteEntryFunctionJSON instead
+// Deprecated: Will be removed in v1.0.0. Use ExecuteEntryFunctionJSON instead.
+// Migration example:
+// Old: ExecuteEntryFunction(ctx, sender, moduleAddr, "module", "func", typeArgs, [][]byte{arg1, arg2})
+// New: ExecuteEntryFunctionJSON(ctx, sender, moduleAddr, "module", "func", typeArgs, []string{`"arg1"`, `"arg2"`})Also applies to: 271-271, 516-516
app/upgrade.go (2)
68-88: Correct typographical error: 'seperator' should be 'separator'
In the comments between lines 68 and 88, the word "seperator" is misspelled. It should be "separator".
124-124: Address the TODO comment
There is a TODO comment indicating that the code needs to be checked and updated accordingly. To maintain code quality and completeness, please address this TODO or ensure it's tracked in an issue.
Would you like assistance in updating the code or creating a GitHub issue to track this task?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- app/upgrade.go (2 hunks)
- x/move/keeper/handler.go (1 hunks)
- x/move/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/move/types/checksum.go (1 hunks)
- x/move/types/connector.go (1 hunks)
- x/move/types/keys.go (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
x/move/types/checksum.go (1)
1-9: Verify test coverage for checksum functionality.
The checksum calculation is a critical security feature. Please ensure comprehensive test coverage including:
- Normal case with valid module bytes
- Edge cases (empty/nil input)
- Known test vectors for SHA-256
Let's check for existing test coverage:
x/move/types/keys.go (1)
68-71: Verify separator changes in upgrade handler.
The reordering of separators and introduction of ChecksumSeparator could impact existing data. Ensure the upgrade handler properly migrates existing data to use the new separator values.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the provided output. I can see that:
- The upgrade handler for v0.6.0 is present and includes code migration logic
- Most importantly, there's a section that walks through the VM store and processes keys based on separators
- The code shows awareness of the separator changes, particularly handling
ModuleSeparator
Let me verify if there's complete migration logic for all separators by checking more context around this code:
Based on the code shown, I can now generate a final response since I have clear evidence of how the separator changes are handled in the upgrade:
Separator changes are properly handled in upgrade handler
The upgrade handler correctly manages the separator changes by:
- Walking through all existing VM store entries
- Incrementing the separator value by 1 for each key (shifting all separators up by 1 to accommodate new
ChecksumSeparator) - Properly handling module checksums during the migration
- Preventing migration of any unknown separators
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify upgrade handler handles separator changes
# Test: Search for separator migration logic in upgrade handlers
rg -A 10 "upgradeName060|ChecksumSeparator" app/upgrade.go
Length of output: 10128
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get more context around the VM store migration logic
rg -A 20 "VMStore.Walk" app/upgrade.go
Length of output: 694
x/move/keeper/handler.go (1)
65-65: Verify backward compatibility with FunctionNameCodePublishV2
The change from FunctionNameCodePublish to FunctionNameCodePublishV2 suggests a breaking change in the module publishing protocol.
Let's verify the impact of this change:
x/move/keeper/keeper.go (2)
208-223: LGTM: Improved error handling in GetExecutionCounter
The error handling enhancement properly distinguishes between "not found" cases (returning 0) and other errors, making the behavior more explicit and robust.
208-223: Consider enhancing the SetChecksum implementation
While the basic functionality is correct, consider the following improvements:
- The comment indicates this should only be used during migration, but there's no enforcement mechanism.
- There's no validation of the checksum format or length.
- The error handling could be more concise.
Consider this improved implementation:
// SetChecksum store checksum bytes
-// This function should be used only when Migration
+// This function should be used only during Migration.
+// Expected checksum format: SHA-256 hash (32 bytes)
func (k Keeper) SetChecksum(
ctx context.Context,
addr vmtypes.AccountAddress,
moduleName string,
checksum []byte,
) error {
+ if len(checksum) != 32 {
+ return fmt.Errorf("invalid checksum length: expected 32 bytes, got %d", len(checksum))
+ }
+
checksumKey, err := types.GetChecksumKey(addr, moduleName)
- if err != nil {
- return err
- }
- if err := k.VMStore.Set(ctx, checksumKey, checksum); err != nil {
+ if err != nil {
return err
}
- return nil
+
+ return k.VMStore.Set(ctx, checksumKey, checksum)
}Let's verify if there are any existing checksum validations in the codebase:
x/move/types/connector.go (1)
66-66: LGTM! Consider documenting the migration strategy.
The new constant follows the established naming convention. However, since this introduces a v2 version of the publish functionality:
Let's verify the migration strategy and usage:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
app/upgrade.go (2)
Line range hint 27-35: Consider externalizing large base64 encoded module data.
Large base64 encoded strings in code reduce readability and make maintenance difficult. Consider moving these to separate configuration files.
// Example: Load from config file
func loadModuleCodes() ([]string, error) {
return config.LoadModuleCodes("upgrade_056_modules.json")
}126-130: Consider adding progress logging for module updates.
For complex operations involving multiple modules, adding progress logs would improve observability during upgrades.
Apply this diff:
modules := make([]vmtypes.Module, len(codesBz))
for i, codeBz := range codesBz {
+ app.Logger().Info("Processing module", "index", i, "total", len(codesBz))
modules[i] = vmtypes.NewModule(codeBz)
}📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- app/upgrade.go (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
app/upgrade.go (5)
4-19: LGTM! Clear version management with descriptive constants.
The renaming of upgrade constants and addition of necessary imports improves code clarity and maintainability.
37-38: LGTM! Proper error handling with SDK error wrapping.
The error handling follows SDK best practices by using sdkerrors.Wrap.
53-55: LGTM! Consistent upgrade handler setup.
The setup follows the established pattern for upgrade handlers.
95-97:
Use consistent error handling with sdkerrors.
Direct use of errors.New breaks consistency with SDK error handling pattern.
Apply this diff:
- return true, errors.New("unknown prefix")
+ return true, sdkerrors.Wrap(sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest, "unknown separator prefix")Likely invalid or redundant comment.
89-91:
Add bounds checking before accessing key index.
The code accesses key[cursor] without verifying the key length, which could cause a panic.
Apply this diff to add safety check:
cursor := movetypes.AddressBytesLength
+ if len(key) <= cursor {
+ return true, sdkerrors.Wrap(sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest, "key length is insufficient")
+ }
separator := key[cursor]Likely invalid or redundant comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
app/upgrade.go (2)
44-56: Add documentation for the separator changes.
The comments explain the previous and current separator structure, but it would be helpful to document why this change was made and its implications.
68-70: Improve error message for unknown separator.
The error message "unknown prefix" could be more descriptive to help with debugging.
Apply this diff:
- return true, errors.New("unknown prefix")
+ return true, fmt.Errorf("unknown separator value: %d", separator)proto/initia/move/v1/types.proto (1)
75-80: LGTM with suggestions for improved documentation and validation.
The new Checksum message structure is well-organized and follows the existing patterns. However, consider these improvements:
- Add field validation and constraints
- Document the checksum generation method
- Indicate required fields
Apply this diff to enhance the message definition:
// Checksum is checksum of the uploaded contract move code
+// It stores the verification hash for a specific module's bytecode to ensure integrity
message Checksum {
- string address = 1;
- string module_name = 2;
- bytes checksum = 3;
+ string address = 1 [(gogoproto.moretags) = "yaml:\"address\"", (gogoproto.nullable) = false];
+ string module_name = 2 [(gogoproto.moretags) = "yaml:\"module_name\"", (gogoproto.nullable) = false];
+ // checksum is a SHA-256 hash of the module's bytecode
+ bytes checksum = 3 [(gogoproto.moretags) = "yaml:\"checksum\"", (gogoproto.nullable) = false];
}x/move/keeper/genesis.go (1)
154-154: Consider grouping related fields together.
The changes look good, but consider grouping the checksum-related fields closer to the module-related fields in both the iteration callback parameters and the genState assignments, since they are conceptually related.
Apply this organization to improve readability:
var modules []types.Module
+var checksums []types.Checksum
var resources []types.Resource
var tableEntries []types.TableEntry
var tableInfos []types.TableInfo
-var checksums []types.Checksum
err = k.IterateVMStore(ctx, func(
module *types.Module,
+ checksum *types.Checksum,
resource *types.Resource,
tableInfo *types.TableInfo,
tableEntry *types.TableEntry,
- checksum *types.Checksum,
) {Also applies to: 160-160, 169-171, 202-202
x/move/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)
56-76: Enhance test coverage with additional test cases.
While the basic checksum functionality is tested, consider adding the following test cases for robustness:
- Negative test case for non-existent module
- Validation of checksum computation correctness
- Test for updating/overwriting checksums
Would you like me to help generate these additional test cases?
x/move/keeper/keeper.go (3)
208-222: Add parameter validation and improve documentation for SetChecksum.
The method needs additional validation and documentation improvements:
- Add validation for checksum bytes (e.g., length, format)
- Document the expected checksum format and validation rules
- Consider adding a migration-only guard if this method should only be used during migration
Example improvements:
// SetChecksum store checksum bytes
// This function should be used only when Migration
+//
+// Parameters:
+// - ctx: The context for the operation
+// - addr: The account address associated with the module
+// - moduleName: The name of the module
+// - checksum: The checksum bytes (expected to be SHA-256 hash, 32 bytes)
func (k Keeper) SetChecksum(
ctx context.Context,
addr vmtypes.AccountAddress,
moduleName string,
checksum []byte,
) error {
+ if len(checksum) != 32 {
+ return fmt.Errorf("invalid checksum length: got %d, want 32", len(checksum))
+ }
+ if len(moduleName) == 0 {
+ return errors.New("empty module name")
+ }
if checksumKey, err := types.GetChecksumKey(addr, moduleName); err != nil {
return err
} else if err := k.VMStore.Set(ctx, checksumKey, checksum); err != nil {224-245: Improve error handling and documentation for GetChecksum.
The method needs documentation improvements and consistent error handling:
Example improvements:
// GetChecksum return checksum of module of the given account address and name
+//
+// Parameters:
+// - ctx: The context for the operation
+// - addr: The account address associated with the module
+// - moduleName: The name of the module
+//
+// Returns:
+// - types.Checksum: The checksum information
+// - error: Returns collections.ErrNotFound if the checksum doesn't exist
func (k Keeper) GetChecksum(
ctx context.Context,
addr vmtypes.AccountAddress,
moduleName string,
) (types.Checksum, error) {
+ if len(moduleName) == 0 {
+ return types.Checksum{}, errors.New("empty module name")
+ }
bz, err := types.GetChecksumKey(addr, moduleName)
if err != nil {
return types.Checksum{}, errLine range hint 552-644: Consider refactoring IterateVMStore for better maintainability.
The method has grown complex with the addition of checksum handling. Consider breaking it down into smaller, focused methods:
Example refactoring:
func (k Keeper) IterateVMStore(ctx context.Context, cb func(*types.Module, *types.Checksum, *types.Resource, *types.TableInfo, *types.TableEntry)) error {
+ return k.iterateStore(ctx, func(key, value []byte) (bool, error) {
+ return k.handleStoreEntry(ctx, key, value, cb)
+ })
+}
+
+func (k Keeper) handleStoreEntry(ctx context.Context, key, value []byte, cb func(*types.Module, *types.Checksum, *types.Resource, *types.TableInfo, *types.TableEntry)) (bool, error) {
+ cursor := types.AddressBytesLength
+ addrBytes := key[:cursor]
+ separator := key[cursor]
+
+ vmAddr, err := vmtypes.NewAccountAddressFromBytes(addrBytes)
+ if err != nil {
+ return true, err
+ }
+
+ cursor += 1
+ switch separator {
+ case types.ModuleSeparator:
+ return k.handleModule(ctx, vmAddr, key[cursor:], value, cb)
+ case types.ChecksumSeparator:
+ return k.handleChecksum(vmAddr, key[cursor:], value, cb)
+ case types.ResourceSeparator:
+ return k.handleResource(vmAddr, key[cursor:], value, cb)
+ case types.TableInfoSeparator:
+ return k.handleTableInfo(vmAddr, value, cb)
+ case types.TableEntrySeparator:
+ return k.handleTableEntry(vmAddr, key[cursor:], value, cb)
+ default:
+ return true, fmt.Errorf("unknown separator: %d", separator)
+ }
+}This refactoring would:
- Improve readability by separating concerns
- Make the code more maintainable
- Make it easier to add new entry types in the future
- Reduce cognitive complexity
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
api/initia/tx/v1/query_grpc.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.gox/move/types/genesis.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.gox/move/types/types.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go,!**/*.pb.go
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- api/initia/intertx/v1/tx.pulsar.go (17 hunks)
- api/initia/move/v1/genesis.pulsar.go (34 hunks)
- api/initia/move/v1/types.pulsar.go (29 hunks)
- api/initia/tx/v1/query.pulsar.go (1 hunks)
- app/upgrade.go (1 hunks)
- proto/initia/move/v1/genesis.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/initia/move/v1/types.proto (1 hunks)
- x/move/keeper/genesis.go (4 hunks)
- x/move/keeper/keeper.go (5 hunks)
- x/move/keeper/keeper_test.go (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (39)
proto/initia/move/v1/genesis.proto (1)
23-27: Verify the impact of adding the new checksums field.
The addition of the checksums field enhances the genesis state with checksum tracking capabilities. However, we need to ensure this change is properly handled in migration scripts.
Please ensure that:
- Migration scripts are in place to handle existing genesis states
- The checksum validation logic is implemented in the keeper layer
- Documentation is updated to reflect this new field's purpose and usage
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
The addition of the checksums field is properly handled in the Move module
The implementation shows that:
- The
Checksumtype is properly defined with address, module name, and checksum fields - Genesis state handling is implemented in the keeper to properly export and store checksums
- The field is integrated with the VM store iteration logic
Since this is a new field being added (not renumbered) and the implementation shows proper handling in both the type definition and genesis state management, this change is safe.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for migration scripts and keeper implementations
# Look for migration scripts
echo "Checking for migration scripts..."
rg -l "genesis.*migration|upgrade.*genesis" -g "*.go"
# Look for checksum validation in keeper
echo "Checking for checksum validation implementation..."
rg -l "checksum.*valid|valid.*checksum" -g "*/keeper/*.go"
Length of output: 453
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search approach
# 1. First, let's find all Go files in the repository
echo "=== Finding all Go files ==="
fd -e go
# 2. Look for migration and upgrade related files
echo -e "\n=== Searching for migration and upgrade patterns ==="
rg -l "upgrade|migration" -t go
# 3. Look specifically for checksum-related code
echo -e "\n=== Searching for checksum-related code ==="
rg -l "checksum" -t go
# 4. Search for Move module keeper implementation
echo -e "\n=== Searching for Move module keeper ==="
fd "keeper" -t d
Length of output: 20221
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the checksum-related code implementation and migration handling
# 1. Check the checksum implementation in Move module
echo "=== Checking checksum implementation ==="
rg -A 10 "type.*Checksum" x/move/types/
# 2. Look for checksum handling in genesis
echo -e "\n=== Checking genesis handling of checksums ==="
rg -A 10 "checksums" x/move/keeper/genesis.go
# 3. Check upgrade handler for checksum migration
echo -e "\n=== Checking upgrade handler ==="
rg -A 10 "initiation-2" app/upgrade.go
# 4. Look for any validation logic
echo -e "\n=== Checking validation logic ==="
rg "Valid.*Checksum|checksum.*valid" x/move/
Length of output: 2177
app/upgrade.go (3)
4-18: LGTM: Imports and version constant look good.
The imports are appropriate for the added functionality, and the version follows semantic versioning.
26-34: Maintain consistent error handling pattern.
Error handling at line 29 directly returns the error without wrapping, breaking consistency with the established pattern.
Apply this diff to maintain consistency:
- return nil, err
+ return nil, sdkerrors.Wrap(err, "failed to read stdlib")95-98: Document module deployment order and consider configuration-driven approach.
The hardcoded list of module files makes the code less flexible and maintainable. Consider:
- Documenting the required order of module deployment, if any
- Moving the module list to a configuration file
Let's verify the module dependencies:
proto/initia/move/v1/types.proto (1)
75-80: Verify integration with upgrade handlers and genesis.
The new Checksum message appears to be part of a larger upgrade handling enhancement. Let's verify its integration:
✅ Verification successful
Checksum message is properly integrated across the system
The verification shows comprehensive integration:
- Genesis handling: Proper export/import of checksums in genesis state
- Keeper implementation: Complete CRUD operations with
SetChecksumandGetChecksummethods - Tests: Thorough test coverage including checksum operations and store iteration
- Upgrade handling: Proper checksum conversion during upgrades
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration of the Checksum message
# Test 1: Check for proper genesis handling
echo "Checking genesis integration..."
rg -l "Checksum" --type go | grep "genesis"
# Test 2: Check for keeper methods using Checksum
echo "Checking keeper integration..."
rg -l "Checksum" --type go | grep "keeper"
# Test 3: Check for upgrade handler integration
echo "Checking upgrade handler integration..."
rg -l "Checksum" --type go | grep "upgrade"
Length of output: 539
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual integration in these files
# Check genesis integration
echo "=== Genesis Integration ==="
rg "Checksum" x/move/keeper/genesis.go -B 2 -A 2
# Check keeper implementation
echo -e "\n=== Keeper Implementation ==="
rg "Checksum" x/move/keeper/keeper.go -B 2 -A 2
# Check upgrade handler
echo -e "\n=== Upgrade Handler ==="
rg "Checksum" app/upgrade.go -B 2 -A 2
# Check if there are any tests
echo -e "\n=== Tests ==="
rg "Checksum" x/move/keeper/keeper_test.go -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 4325
x/move/keeper/genesis.go (2)
93-102: Verify upgrade compatibility for existing chains.
Since this PR is preparing for an upgrade (initiation-2), ensure that existing chains can handle the new checksum fields during the upgrade process. Consider adding upgrade handlers to initialize checksums for existing modules if necessary.
Let's check for upgrade handlers:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for upgrade handlers that might need to handle checksum initialization
# Test: Search for upgrade handlers
rg -A 10 "func.*Upgrade.*Handler"
# Test: Search for any migration code
rg -A 10 "func.*Migrate"Also applies to: 154-202
93-102: LGTM! Verify checksum initialization order.
The checksum initialization logic is well-implemented with proper error handling. The implementation follows the existing patterns used for modules and resources.
Let's verify the initialization order dependencies:
x/move/keeper/keeper_test.go (1)
Line range hint 194-210: Verify the intended upgrade policy.
There's an inconsistency in the upgrade policies used across tests:
TestGetAndSetChecksumusesUpgradePolicy_IMMUTABLETestIterateVMStoreusesUpgradePolicy_COMPATIBLE
This might indicate confusion about the expected behavior. Please verify the correct upgrade policy and update tests accordingly.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the results from the rg search to understand the upgrade policy usage patterns:
-
The codebase defines three upgrade policies:
UNSPECIFIED(0): Invalid/unset stateCOMPATIBLE(1): Allows upgrades with compatibility checksIMMUTABLE(2): No upgrades allowed
-
Looking at the test files:
- Most test cases use
COMPATIBLEas the default policy TestGetAndSetChecksumspecifically tests theIMMUTABLEpolicyTestIterateVMStoreusesCOMPATIBLEpolicy
- Most test cases use
-
The default policy in CLI flags is set to
COMPATIBLE:FlagUpgradePolicy, types.UpgradePolicy_name[int32(types.UpgradePolicy_COMPATIBLE)]
-
Production code in
app/upgrade.goalso usesCOMPATIBLEas the policy.
The upgrade policy usage in TestIterateVMStore is correct.
The use of UpgradePolicy_COMPATIBLE in TestIterateVMStore aligns with the codebase's default behavior. The IMMUTABLE policy in TestGetAndSetChecksum is intentionally different as it specifically tests the immutable policy scenario. This is not an inconsistency but rather proper test coverage of different upgrade policies.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all upgrade policy usages to verify consistency
rg -A 2 "UpgradePolicy_"
Length of output: 11305
api/initia/intertx/v1/tx.pulsar.go (5)
10-10: LGTM: Import of IBC channel types.
The addition of the IBC channel types import is appropriate for supporting the new Ordering field.
1910-1913: LGTM: Addition of Ordering field to MsgRegisterAccount struct.
The new Ordering field is properly added to the MsgRegisterAccount struct with appropriate protobuf tags and JSON annotations. The field type types.Order is correctly used from the IBC channel package.
1957-1962: LGTM: GetOrdering accessor method implementation.
The GetOrdering method is correctly implemented with proper nil checks and default value handling.
2160-2174: LGTM: Updated type dependencies.
The type dependencies are correctly updated to include both the IBC Order type and maintain existing dependencies.
2081-2095: Verify protobuf message compatibility.
The protobuf message definition has been updated to include the new ordering field with tag number 4. While the change looks correct, we should verify that this change maintains backward compatibility with existing clients.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the protobuf message usage.
Let me try one more search to find the original proto definition and any existing implementations.
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response since I have enough information about the protobuf message usage and implementation.
The protobuf change maintains backward compatibility
The addition of the ordering field with tag number 4 follows protobuf's backward compatibility rules:
- It's an optional field (not required)
- Uses a new field number that wasn't previously used
- The field has a default value (Order(0))
- Existing code in x/intertx/types/msgs.go and keeper implementation handles the field appropriately
The implementation shows proper handling in tests and message server, with the ordering field being properly initialized when needed:
msg := types.NewMsgRegisterAccount(owner, path.EndpointA.ConnectionID, path.EndpointA.ChannelConfig.Version)
msg.Ordering = channeltypes.ORDERED🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any existing protobuf message usage that might be affected by the field addition
# Search for any direct protobuf message usage
rg -l "MsgRegisterAccount.*{" --type go
# Search for any gRPC client implementations that might need updates
rg -l "MsgClient" --type go
Length of output: 759
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for MsgRegisterAccount usage with proper regex
rg "MsgRegisterAccount\s*{" -A 5 --type go
# Check the proto file for any existing MsgRegisterAccount definitions
fd -e proto | xargs rg "message\s+MsgRegisterAccount\s*{" -A 10
# Look for any tests involving MsgRegisterAccount
rg "MsgRegisterAccount" --type go -g "*_test.go"
Length of output: 1231
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for proto file containing MsgRegisterAccount without regex
rg -l "MsgRegisterAccount" --type proto
# Search for the implementation file
rg -l "func.*MsgRegisterAccount" --type go
# Check the keeper implementation
rg "RegisterAccount" -A 5 --type go
Length of output: 68102
api/initia/move/v1/genesis.pulsar.go (20)
Line range hint 117-157: Addition of _GenesisState_5_list for Checksum type
The new list type _GenesisState_5_list has been correctly implemented to handle the Checksum type. Methods like Set, Append, AppendMutable, and NewElement are appropriately updated to work with *Checksum pointers.
Line range hint 168-208: Update _GenesisState_6_list for Resource type
The _GenesisState_6_list struct and its associated methods have been updated to handle *Resource pointers. The implementation aligns with the expected structure and functionality.
Line range hint 219-259: Introduction of _GenesisState_7_list for TableInfo type
The new list type _GenesisState_7_list for *TableInfo pointers appears to be correctly implemented. All associated methods handle the TableInfo type as expected.
Line range hint 270-310: Addition of _GenesisState_8_list for TableEntry type
The _GenesisState_8_list struct has been introduced to manage *TableEntry pointers. The methods are correctly implemented and consistent with other list types.
318-368: Implementation of _GenesisState_9_list for DexPair type
A new list type _GenesisState_9_list has been added for handling *DexPair pointers. The struct and its methods (Len, Get, Set, Append, AppendMutable, Truncate, NewElement, IsValid) are properly defined.
Line range hint 375-390: Update field descriptors to include Checksums
The field descriptor fd_GenesisState_checksums has been added and initialized. This ensures that the Checksums field is correctly integrated into the GenesisState message descriptor.
485-490: Handle Checksums in the Range method
The Range method in fastReflection_GenesisState now includes logic to iterate over the Checksums field when it's populated. This addition ensures that Checksums are properly reflected during message iteration.
538-539: Implement Has method for Checksums field
The Has method now checks for the presence of the Checksums field in GenesisState. This allows for correct reporting on whether the Checksums field is populated.
572-573: Include Checksums in the Clear method
The Clear method has been updated to handle the Checksums field, ensuring that it can be reset to its zero value when needed.
616-621: Update Get method to retrieve Checksums
The Get method in fastReflection_GenesisState now includes logic to retrieve the Checksums field. This ensures proper access to the Checksums list via reflection.
678-681: Modify Set method to assign Checksums field
The Set method has been updated to handle assignment to the Checksums field. This allows for correct setting of the Checksums list through reflection.
735-740: Enhance Mutable method for Checksums
The Mutable method now supports the Checksums field, allowing for obtaining a mutable reference to modify the Checksums list.
791-793: Initialize Checksums in NewField method
The NewField method includes initialization for the Checksums field, returning a new, empty list. This ensures that new instances of GenesisState have the Checksums field properly set up.
894-899: Include Checksums in size calculation
The Size method now accounts for the Checksums field in the overall size calculation of the GenesisState message. This ensures accurate sizing for serialization purposes.
1014-1029: Handle Checksums in the Marshal method
The Marshal method has been updated to serialize the Checksums field. This addition ensures that all Checksums data is properly included during message serialization.
1248-1281: Update Unmarshal method to parse Checksums
The Unmarshal method now includes logic to deserialize the Checksums field from the input data. This guarantees that incoming data correctly populates the Checksums list.
1475-1479: Add Checksums field to GenesisState struct
The Checksums field has been added to the GenesisState struct with appropriate protobuf annotations. This expansion of the struct allows for the storage of checksum data associated with modules.
1530-1535: Introduce GetChecksums method
A getter method GetChecksums has been implemented to access the Checksums field. This provides a standard way to retrieve checksum data from a GenesisState instance.
Line range hint 1575-1633: Update protobuf definitions to include Checksums
The protobuf definition in genesis.proto has been updated to include the checksums field with field number 5. Ensure that this change is reflected across all dependent services and that backward compatibility is maintained.
1653-1671: Adjust Go types and dependencies for Checksum
The Go types and dependency indexes have been updated to include the new Checksum type. This change ensures that the generated code aligns with the updated protobuf definitions.
api/initia/tx/v1/query.pulsar.go (4)
1737-1741: Definition of QueryGasPricesRequest is appropriate
The QueryGasPricesRequest message is correctly defined for the Query/GasPrices RPC method, with necessary proto message state fields.
1764-1770: Definition of QueryGasPricesResponse is appropriate
The QueryGasPricesResponse message appropriately includes the GasPrices field as a repeated DecCoin, which is suitable for returning multiple gas prices.
1800-1807: Definition of QueryGasPriceRequest is appropriate
The QueryGasPriceRequest message includes the Denom field to specify the denomination, which is suitable for querying a specific gas price.
1837-1843: Definition of QueryGasPriceResponse is appropriate
The QueryGasPriceResponse message correctly contains the GasPrice field of type DecCoin, fitting for returning a specific gas price.
api/initia/move/v1/types.pulsar.go (2)
2007-2020: Addition of 'Checksum' message and descriptors
The Checksum message and its field descriptors have been correctly defined and initialized. The code follows the established patterns for adding new message types.
2022-2555: Implementation of 'Checksum' message methods
The methods associated with the Checksum message properly implement the protoreflect.Message interface and adhere to the conventions used in existing message types. This ensures consistency and correct behavior within the protobuf reflection system.
* connect movevm with loaderv2 and introduce module & script cache * use cache context before query * disable unstable * update movevm to latest * add toml description --------- Co-authored-by: beer-1 <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
x/move/keeper/vm_msg_stargate.go (1)
Line range hint
17-45: Consider adding debug logging for better observability.For better operational visibility, consider adding debug logging at key points:
- Before message unmarshal
- After successful validation
- When signer verification fails
func (k Keeper) HandleVMStargateMsg(ctx context.Context, req *vmtypes.CosmosMessage) (proto.Message, error) { + k.Logger(ctx).Debug("handling cosmos message", "data", string(req.Data)) var sdkMsg sdk.Msg err := k.cdc.UnmarshalInterfaceJSON(req.Data, &sdkMsg) if err != nil { + k.Logger(ctx).Debug("failed to unmarshal message", "error", err) return nil, err } if m, ok := sdkMsg.(sdk.HasValidateBasic); ok { if err := m.ValidateBasic(); err != nil { + k.Logger(ctx).Debug("message validation failed", "error", err) return nil, err } } + k.Logger(ctx).Debug("message validated successfully", "type", sdk.MsgTypeURL(sdkMsg))x/move/keeper/vm_query.go (1)
Line range hint
28-50: Consider extracting cache context handling into middlewareThe duplicate cache context creation pattern in both query handlers suggests an opportunity for improvement. Consider implementing a middleware approach that automatically wraps query operations in a cache context with proper error handling and cleanup.
This would:
- Centralize the cache context lifecycle management
- Ensure consistent error handling
- Reduce code duplication
- Make it easier to modify caching behavior in the future
Example approach:
func withCacheContext(ctx sdk.Context, fn func(sdk.Context) ([]byte, error)) ([]byte, error) { cacheCtx, err := ctx.CacheContext() if err != nil { return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to create cache context: %w", err) } defer cacheCtx.CacheContext().Delete() return fn(cacheCtx) }x/move/config/config.go (1)
49-50: Enhance flag descriptions with units and constraints.The flag descriptions would be more helpful if they included:
- The unit of measurement for cache capacity
- Any minimum/maximum constraints
- Performance implications of different values
- startCmd.Flags().Uint64(flagScriptCacheCapacity, DefaultScriptCacheCapacity, "Set the script cache capacity") - startCmd.Flags().Uint64(flagModuleCacheCapacity, DefaultModuleCacheCapacity, "Set the module cache capacity") + startCmd.Flags().Uint64(flagScriptCacheCapacity, DefaultScriptCacheCapacity, "Set the script cache capacity (number of entries, default: 100)") + startCmd.Flags().Uint64(flagModuleCacheCapacity, DefaultModuleCacheCapacity, "Set the module cache capacity (number of entries, default: 500)")app/upgrade.go (4)
49-61: Document the breaking changes in separator values.The migration introduces significant changes to separator values. This should be clearly documented in the upgrade guide to ensure proper migration planning.
Consider adding detailed comments explaining the separator value changes and their implications.
64-98: Add detailed logging for migration progress.The migration process would benefit from more detailed logging to help track progress and debug issues in production.
Consider adding structured logging at key points:
- Before/after each module processing
- Number of records processed
- Checksum calculations
116-127: Add validation and rollback handling for module upgrades.While the module publishing looks correct, consider these improvements:
- Validate each module's successful deployment
- Implement rollback mechanism for failed upgrades
- Add health checks post-deployment
Consider implementing a validation step:
func validateModuleDeployment(ctx context.Context, keeper *MoveKeeper, modules []vmtypes.Module) error { // Verify each module is properly deployed // Check critical functions are accessible // Validate state consistency }
Line range hint
22-133: Consider implementing a phased upgrade approach.Given the complexity of this upgrade (separator changes, module updates, and data migration), consider implementing a phased approach:
- Pre-upgrade validation phase
- Data backup phase
- Migration execution phase
- Post-upgrade verification phase
This would make the upgrade process more robust and easier to troubleshoot if issues occur.
Would you like assistance in designing this phased approach?
x/move/keeper/genesis.go (1)
107-116: Ensure deterministic checksum initialization.While the checksum handling looks correct, consider sorting the checksums before initialization to ensure deterministic genesis state across all nodes in the network.
Consider sorting checksums by address and module name:
+ sort.Slice(genState.GetChecksums(), func(i, j int) bool { + if genState.Checksums[i].Address == genState.Checksums[j].Address { + return genState.Checksums[i].ModuleName < genState.Checksums[j].ModuleName + } + return genState.Checksums[i].Address < genState.Checksums[j].Address + }) for _, checksum := range genState.GetChecksums() {x/move/keeper/keeper.go (1)
201-215: Enhance the migration-related documentation.The comment "This function should be used only when Migration" could be more descriptive. Consider adding:
- What type of migration this is for
- Potential risks of using it outside migration
- Example usage in migration context
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
go.modis excluded by!**/*.modgo.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum,!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (22)
Dockerfile(1 hunks)app/upgrade.go(1 hunks)x/bank/keeper/common_test.go(1 hunks)x/distribution/keeper/common_test.go(1 hunks)x/gov/keeper/common_test.go(1 hunks)x/ibc-hooks/keeper/common_test.go(1 hunks)x/ibc-hooks/move-hooks/common_test.go(1 hunks)x/move/config/config.go(2 hunks)x/move/keeper/common_test.go(3 hunks)x/move/keeper/genesis.go(7 hunks)x/move/keeper/handler.go(6 hunks)x/move/keeper/keeper.go(8 hunks)x/move/keeper/staking_test.go(1 hunks)x/move/keeper/vm_msg_stargate.go(1 hunks)x/move/keeper/vm_msg_stargate_test.go(1 hunks)x/move/keeper/vm_query.go(2 hunks)x/move/keeper/vmpool.go(0 hunks)x/move/types/checksum.go(1 hunks)x/move/types/cosmos_message.go(0 hunks)x/mstaking/keeper/common_test.go(1 hunks)x/reward/keeper/common_test.go(1 hunks)x/slashing/keeper/common_test.go(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- x/move/keeper/vmpool.go
- x/move/types/cosmos_message.go
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- x/move/types/checksum.go
🔇 Additional comments (34)
x/move/keeper/vm_msg_stargate.go (1)
17-17: Verify the impact of changing from StargateMessage to CosmosMessage.
The parameter type change looks good, but let's verify that all callers have been updated accordingly.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search strategy to verify this change more thoroughly.
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
Parameter type change from StargateMessage to CosmosMessage is correctly implemented
The verification shows that:
- All references to
HandleVMStargateMsgconsistently use*vmtypes.CosmosMessage - The function is called from
handler.goand tested invm_msg_stargate_test.go - No legacy
StargateMessagereferences remain in the codebase - The change aligns with the module's message handling system, as evidenced by related
CosmosMessageusage inDispatchMessagesand error definitions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to StargateMessage
# and verify all callers are using CosmosMessage
# Search for any remaining StargateMessage references
echo "Checking for remaining StargateMessage references:"
rg "StargateMessage"
# Search for HandleVMStargateMsg callers
echo -e "\nChecking HandleVMStargateMsg callers:"
ast-grep --pattern 'HandleVMStargateMsg($$$)'
Length of output: 270
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to HandleVMStargateMsg using ripgrep with context
echo "Searching for HandleVMStargateMsg references with context:"
rg -A 5 -B 5 "HandleVMStargateMsg"
# Search for CosmosMessage type references
echo -e "\nSearching for CosmosMessage type references:"
rg "CosmosMessage"
# Search for any message type definitions in vmtypes
echo -e "\nSearching for message type definitions in vmtypes:"
fd -e go -e proto "vmtypes" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 4762
x/move/keeper/vm_msg_stargate_test.go (2)
Line range hint 41-49: LGTM! Valid access test case properly updated.
The test case correctly validates the successful handling of a governance vote message using the new CosmosMessage type. The response validation remains thorough and appropriate.
34-37: LGTM! Unauthorized access test case properly updated.
The test case correctly validates that unauthorized access is prevented when using the new CosmosMessage type.
Let's verify the consistent usage of the new message type across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Type migration from StargateMessage to CosmosMessage is complete and consistent
The verification confirms:
- No remaining references to the old
StargateMessagetype in the codebase CosmosMessageis consistently used across all relevant files:- Message handling in
vm_msg_stargate.go - Error definitions in
types/errors.go - Test cases in
vm_msg_stargate_test.go - Message dispatching in
handler.go
- Message handling in
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that StargateMessage has been completely replaced with CosmosMessage
# and there are no lingering references to the old type.
# Test 1: Check for any remaining StargateMessage references
echo "Checking for remaining StargateMessage references..."
rg "StargateMessage"
# Test 2: Verify CosmosMessage usage in related files
echo "Verifying CosmosMessage usage..."
rg "CosmosMessage" -A 3
Length of output: 2771
x/move/keeper/vm_query.go (1)
49-50:
Improve error handling for Stargate query cache context
Similar to the custom query handler, the cache context creation needs proper error handling and lifecycle management.
Apply the same fix pattern:
- ctx, _ = ctx.CacheContext()
+ cacheCtx, err := ctx.CacheContext()
+ if err != nil {
+ return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to create cache context: %w", err)
+ }
+ // Use cacheCtx for the query operation
+ defer cacheCtx.CacheContext().Delete()Let's verify if this change affects upgrade handling:
Dockerfile (1)
9-9: Verify compatibility with v0.6.0.
The major version bump from v0.5.1 to v0.6.0 could introduce breaking changes. Please ensure this version is compatible with the changes in app/upgrade.go and other dependent components.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the upgrade handlers and version dependencies.
Let me check one more aspect to verify the upgrade compatibility.
Version update is aligned with codebase upgrade plan
The LIBMOVEVM version bump to v0.6.0 is verified to be part of a coordinated upgrade:
- The upgrade handler in app/upgrade.go defines the same version
0.6.0as the upgrade name - The change includes Move VM module updates and redeployment logic
- A comment in go.mod explicitly links the LIBMOVEVM_VERSION update to this upgrade
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any version-specific code or dependencies in the codebase
# Test: Look for any hardcoded version references that might need updating
rg -g '!Dockerfile' 'v0.5'
# Test: Check upgrade handlers that might need to handle version-specific logic
ast-grep --pattern 'func RegisterUpgradeHandlers'
Length of output: 7202
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for upgrade-related code and version dependencies
# Look for upgrade handlers and version-specific logic
rg -g '!{*.sum,*.mod}' -A 5 'initiation-2'
# Check for any Move VM version references
rg -g '!Dockerfile' 'LIBMOVEVM'
# Look for upgrade-related constants or version definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = "initiation-2"'
Length of output: 909
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the upgrade handler implementation and version-specific changes
rg -A 10 'func (app \*App) BeginBlocker' app/
# Look for any Move VM related configurations or dependencies
rg -A 5 'move' app/upgrade.go
Length of output: 1526
x/move/config/config.go (5)
17-18: LGTM!
The new flag definitions follow the established naming convention and maintain consistency with the config field names.
24-25: LGTM!
The new fields are properly typed and tagged, following the existing struct field patterns.
32-33: LGTM!
The default configuration properly initializes the new cache capacity fields with their respective constants.
12-13: Consider documenting cache capacity units and rationale.
The default cache capacities (100 and 500) would benefit from:
- Documentation specifying the unit of measurement (bytes, entries, etc.)
- Explanation of how these values were determined
- Consider using powers of 2 for optimal memory allocation if these represent byte sizes
Line range hint 1-65: Verify upgrade handler implementation.
Since these configuration changes are part of an upgrade preparation, we should verify that the upgrade handler properly handles these new configuration values.
app/upgrade.go (1)
4-19: LGTM: Import changes and version update look good.
The new imports support the enhanced functionality, and the version update to "0.6.0" aligns with the upgrade objectives.
x/move/keeper/genesis.go (2)
168-168: Verify genesis state compatibility.
The addition of checksums to the genesis state looks correct. However, please ensure:
- The exported genesis state is compatible with nodes running older versions
- The genesis export properly handles the case when no checksums exist
Let's verify the genesis state structure and compatibility:
Also applies to: 174-174, 183-186, 216-216
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the genesis state handling to verify backward compatibility.
Let me check one more aspect about the checksum handling in the genesis state.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Genesis state changes are backward compatible
The addition of checksums to the genesis state is safe because:
- The
checksumsfield is marked withomitemptyin protobuf definition, making it optional - The default genesis state is properly handled in
DefaultGenesisState() - Genesis validation through
ValidateGenesis()only validates params, not checksums - Older nodes can safely ignore the new checksums field during state import
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check genesis state structure and usage
rg -A 10 "type GenesisState struct"
rg "UnmarshalJSON.*GenesisState"
Length of output: 16799
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check genesis state validation and initialization
rg -A 5 "ValidateGenesis|InitGenesis|DefaultGenesis" x/move/
Length of output: 3976
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check checksum handling in genesis
rg -A 5 "Checksum.*omitempty" x/move/
rg -A 10 "ExportGenesis" x/move/
Length of output: 2436
59-69: Verify staking initialization prerequisites.
The staking initialization is a critical operation. Please ensure:
- The order of operations is correct (coin initialization before staking)
- The impact of failed initialization on the system state
Let's verify the staking keeper implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the initialization process and error handling.
Let me check one more aspect to understand the implementation details and error handling in the bank keeper.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Staking initialization sequence is correctly implemented
The code follows a proper initialization sequence:
- The null check on StakingKeeper ensures safe conditional initialization
- Coin initialization precedes staking initialization as required
- Error handling is properly implemented with immediate returns on failures, preventing partial initializations
- The handleExecuteResponse ensures proper event emission and state management
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check staking keeper interface and initialization
rg -A 5 "type StakingKeeper interface"
rg -A 5 "InitializeStaking.*baseDenom"
Length of output: 2984
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check InitializeStaking implementation and MoveBankKeeper interface
ast-grep --pattern 'func (k Keeper) InitializeStaking(ctx $_, baseDenom $_) error {
$$$
}'
rg -A 5 "type MoveBankKeeper interface"
rg -A 5 "InitializeCoin.*ctx"
Length of output: 1847
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check bank keeper implementation and error handling
ast-grep --pattern 'func (k $keeper) InitializeCoin(ctx $_, denom $_) error {
$$$
}'
rg -B 5 -A 10 "func \(k.*Keeper\) handleExecuteResponse"
Length of output: 1020
x/reward/keeper/common_test.go (1)
378-378: LGTM! Verify Initialize method signature.
The addition of bondDenom parameter to moveKeeper.Initialize is consistent with the move parameters setup where moveParams.BaseDenom is set to the same value.
Let's verify the Initialize method signature across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate one more verification script to check the complete method signature in the keeper implementation:
Initialize method signature is consistent across the codebase
The verification confirms that:
- The
Initializemethod inx/move/keeper/genesis.gocorrectly acceptsbaseDenomas the fourth parameter - All test files across different modules consistently pass
bondDenomas the fourth argument - The implementation properly uses
baseDenomto initialize the move staking module and coin
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Initialize method signature is consistent
# Test: Search for Initialize method definition and usage
# Expect: All Initialize calls include bondDenom parameter
# Find Initialize method definition
ast-grep --pattern 'func (k *Keeper) Initialize($$$) $$ {'
# Find Initialize method calls
rg -A 2 'Initialize\('
Length of output: 2720
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full Initialize method implementation from the keeper
ast-grep --pattern 'func (k Keeper) Initialize(ctx context.Context, moduleBytes [][]byte, $$$) error {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 3256
x/ibc-hooks/move-hooks/common_test.go (1)
312-312: LGTM! Verify test coverage across the codebase.
The update to moveKeeper.Initialize correctly includes the new bondDenom parameter. However, let's ensure consistent test coverage across the codebase.
Let's verify that all test files have been updated with the new Initialize signature:
✅ Verification successful
All test files have been properly updated with the new Initialize signature
The verification shows that all test files consistently use the updated moveKeeper.Initialize signature with the bondDenom parameter. Each occurrence follows the same pattern:
moveKeeper.Initialize(ctx, moduleBytes/stdlib, moveParams.AllowedPublishers, bondDenom)🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential missing updates to moveKeeper.Initialize calls in test files
# Test: Search for Initialize calls in test files. Expect: All calls include bondDenom parameter
# Search for moveKeeper.Initialize calls in test files
rg -t go --multiline 'moveKeeper\.Initialize\([^)]+\)' -g '*_test.go'
# Search for potential test files that might need updates
fd -e go -g '*_test.go' --exec grep -l 'moveKeeper'
Length of output: 1569
x/move/keeper/handler.go (5)
Line range hint 407-445: LGTM! Improved error handling in message dispatch
The enhanced error handling with AllowFailure flag and proper message validation through HandleVMStargateMsg provides better control and safety.
600-606: LGTM! Consistent VM execution pattern
The view function execution follows the same pattern of direct VM access while maintaining proper context and gas handling.
425-434: Verify callback execution with JSON arguments
The callback handling has been updated to use JSON arguments. Please ensure that all callback implementations support the new JSON format.
Let's check callback implementations:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for callback implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'function $name($$$) {
$$$
$callback($$$)
$$$
}'65-65: Verify upgrade compatibility for FunctionNameCodePublishV2
The change from FunctionNameCodePublish to FunctionNameCodePublishV2 indicates a breaking change in the API.
Let's verify the upgrade path and usage:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining references to the old function name
rg "FunctionNameCodePublish[^V]"
# Check for upgrade handling code
rg -A 5 "upgrade.*handler.*publish"173-180: Verify deadlock prevention after removing execVM wrapper
The code now directly uses k.initiaMoveVM instead of the previous execVM wrapper that handled deadlock prevention. Please ensure that deadlock prevention is maintained in the new implementation.
Let's check for any deadlock prevention mechanisms:
x/ibc-hooks/keeper/common_test.go (1)
399-399: LGTM: Consistent bond denomination handling
The addition of bondDenom parameter to moveKeeper.Initialize is consistent with its usage throughout the test setup, where it's properly configured in staking, reward, distribution, and move parameters.
x/bank/keeper/common_test.go (1)
397-397: LGTM! Consider adding test cases for different bond denominations.
The addition of bondDenom parameter to Initialize aligns with the consistent usage of bond denomination throughout the test setup. The parameter is properly sourced from the constant and matches its usage in staking, reward, distribution, and move parameters.
Let's verify that we have test coverage for different bond denominations:
x/mstaking/keeper/common_test.go (1)
423-423: Verify bond denomination consistency.
The bondDenom parameter is passed to Initialize after setting it as BaseDenom in moveParams. Consider adding a test case to verify the initialization behavior when these values differ, ensuring proper validation or synchronization between them.
Consider adding a test case:
func TestMoveKeeperInitializeWithDifferentBondDenom(t *testing.T) {
// Test initialization with mismatched BaseDenom and bondDenom
// to verify expected behavior
}x/gov/keeper/common_test.go (1)
409-409: LGTM! Consistent bond denomination usage across modules.
The addition of bondDenom parameter to moveKeeper.Initialize aligns with the module-wide standardization of bond denomination usage, maintaining consistency with other module configurations (staking, reward, distribution, and governance parameters).
x/slashing/keeper/common_test.go (1)
392-393: LGTM: Proper initialization with bond denomination.
The update to include bondDenom in moveKeeper.Initialize is correct and consistent with similar changes across other test files.
x/move/keeper/keeper.go (4)
93-107: LGTM: VM configuration and initialization looks good!
The code properly handles default values for cache capacities and initializes the VM with appropriate error handling.
Line range hint 545-585: Previous suggestion about builder pattern still applies.
The callback signature with 5 nullable parameters could benefit from the builder pattern as suggested in the previous review.
Line range hint 1-238: Verify upgrade implications.
As this PR prepares for "initiation-2 upgrade", please ensure:
- The new checksum functionality has a migration path
- The VM configuration changes won't affect existing deployments
- The changes to
IterateVMStorewon't break existing consumers
Consider adding upgrade documentation that covers these changes.
#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing upgrade handlers and docs
echo "Checking for upgrade handlers..."
rg -l 'upgrade.*handler.*initiation-2'
echo "Checking for upgrade documentation..."
fd -g '*UPGRADE*.md'50-50: Verify the field naming convention.
The field name initiaMoveVM contains the product name. Consider if this should be more generic, like moveVM, to maintain better abstraction.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about naming patterns in the codebase to make a better assessment.
Let me search for more context about the naming patterns and VM-related fields in the codebase.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response about the field naming convention:
The field name initiaMoveVM follows established naming patterns in the codebase
The field name is appropriate because:
- It implements the
VMEngineinterface which is a core abstraction - The
initiaprefix is used consistently in the codebase for VM-related components (e.g.,InitiaVMConfig) - The field represents the specific Move VM implementation for the Initia blockchain, so the prefix helps distinguish it from potential alternative VM implementations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if similar naming patterns exist in the codebase
rg -l 'initia.*VM'
Length of output: 223
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for VM-related field declarations and usages
rg -g '*.go' 'VM\s+\w+' -A 2
# Search for Move-related types and fields
rg -g '*.go' 'Move[A-Z]\w+' -A 2
# Look for other engine/VM interfaces and implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ interface {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 283307
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for VM-related fields and their naming patterns
rg -g '*.go' 'type.*Keeper.*struct.*{[\s\S]*VM.*}' -A 5
# Search for VM-related interfaces and their implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'type VMEngine interface {
$$$
}'
# Look for other VM-related type definitions
rg -g '*.go' 'type.*VM.*'
Length of output: 7324
x/distribution/keeper/common_test.go (1)
381-381: LGTM! The Initialize method call is properly updated.
The addition of bondDenom parameter is consistent with the test setup, where bondDenom is already properly defined as a constant and used throughout the test utilities for various keeper configurations.
x/move/keeper/common_test.go (3)
52-54: LGTM! IBC module imports are properly organized.
The new IBC-related imports are logically grouped and follow the project's import organization pattern.
97-99: LGTM! IBC modules are properly registered.
The new IBC modules are correctly added to the ModuleBasics manager, which is necessary for their integration into the test environment.
429-429: Verify the impact of the bondDenom parameter addition.
The Initialize method now includes bondDenom as a parameter. While this change looks correct, ensure that all test cases using this setup function are updated accordingly.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can generate the final response as we have comprehensive information about all the Initialize calls in the codebase.
All test cases are properly updated with the bondDenom parameter
The search results show that all test cases across different modules (slashing, reward, mstaking, move, ibc-hooks, distribution, gov, bank) are consistently using the bondDenom parameter in their Initialize calls. No outdated calls were found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other Initialize calls that might need updating
rg -A 2 "moveKeeper\.Initialize\(" --type go
Length of output: 1960
x/move/keeper/staking_test.go (1)
236-276: Test TestApplyStakingDeltas_BaseDenom is correctly implemented
The test function is well-structured and effectively verifies the delegation logic for the base denomination. Error handling and assertions are appropriately used.
x/move/config/config.go
Outdated
| # The capacity of the script cache in (MiB). | ||
| script-cache-capacity = "{{ .MoveConfig.ScriptCacheCapacity }}" | ||
| # The capacity of the module cache in (MiB). | ||
| module-cache-capacity = "{{ .MoveConfig.ModuleCacheCapacity }}" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Resolve unit inconsistency in documentation.
The config template suggests the cache capacities are in MiB, but this unit isn't mentioned in:
- The constant definitions
- The flag descriptions
- The struct field documentation
Please ensure consistency in unit specification across all documentation.
app/upgrade.go
Outdated
| key[cursor] = key[cursor] + 1 | ||
| kvs = append(kvs, KV{ | ||
| key: bytes.Clone(key), | ||
| value: bytes.Clone(value), | ||
| }) | ||
| return false, nil |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add bounds check before key modification.
The key modification at line 92 could cause a panic if cursor is out of bounds.
Add a safety check:
+ if len(key) <= cursor {
+ return true, sdkerrors.Wrap(sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest, "invalid key length for separator increment")
+ }
key[cursor] = key[cursor] + 1📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| key[cursor] = key[cursor] + 1 | |
| kvs = append(kvs, KV{ | |
| key: bytes.Clone(key), | |
| value: bytes.Clone(value), | |
| }) | |
| return false, nil | |
| if len(key) <= cursor { | |
| return true, sdkerrors.Wrap(sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest, "invalid key length for separator increment") | |
| } | |
| key[cursor] = key[cursor] + 1 | |
| kvs = append(kvs, KV{ | |
| key: bytes.Clone(key), | |
| value: bytes.Clone(value), | |
| }) | |
| return false, nil |
app/upgrade.go
Outdated
| codeModuleBz, err := vmprecompile.ReadStdlib("code.mv") | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
| err = app.MoveKeeper.SetModule(ctx, vmtypes.StdAddress, movetypes.MoveModuleNameCode, codeModuleBz[0]) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve error handling consistency.
The error handling should follow the established pattern of using sdkerrors.Wrap to provide context.
Apply this diff:
- return nil, err
+ return nil, sdkerrors.Wrap(err, "failed to read code.mv stdlib")📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| codeModuleBz, err := vmprecompile.ReadStdlib("code.mv") | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, err | |
| } | |
| err = app.MoveKeeper.SetModule(ctx, vmtypes.StdAddress, movetypes.MoveModuleNameCode, codeModuleBz[0]) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, err | |
| } | |
| codeModuleBz, err := vmprecompile.ReadStdlib("code.mv") | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, sdkerrors.Wrap(err, "failed to read code.mv stdlib") | |
| } | |
| err = app.MoveKeeper.SetModule(ctx, vmtypes.StdAddress, movetypes.MoveModuleNameCode, codeModuleBz[0]) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, err | |
| } |
x/move/keeper/genesis.go
Outdated
| if err = k.handleExecuteResponse(sdkCtx, sdkCtx.GasMeter(), execRes); err != nil { | ||
| return err | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove duplicate error handling.
The error handling for execRes appears twice - once immediately after the VM initialization and again at the end of the function. This is redundant and could lead to confusion.
Remove the first error handling block:
execRes, err := k.initiaMoveVM.Initialize(vmStore, api, env, vmtypes.NewModuleBundle(modules...), _allowedPublishers)
if err != nil {
return err
}
-if err = k.handleExecuteResponse(sdkCtx, sdkCtx.GasMeter(), execRes); err != nil {
- return err
-}
// if staking keeper is available...Also applies to: 71-71
x/move/keeper/genesis.go
Outdated
| @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ func (k Keeper) Initialize( | |||
| ctx context.Context, | |||
| moduleBytes [][]byte, | |||
| allowedPublishers []string, | |||
| baseDenom string, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add baseDenom validation.
The baseDenom parameter is used for critical initialization but lacks validation. Consider validating the denomination format to prevent issues during coin and staking initialization.
Add validation before usage:
baseDenom string,
) error {
+ if err := sdk.ValidateDenom(baseDenom); err != nil {
+ return fmt.Errorf("invalid base denomination: %w", err)
+ }
sdkCtx := sdk.UnwrapSDKContext(ctx)Also applies to: 61-61
x/move/keeper/staking_test.go
Outdated
| // add second BondDenom to staking keeper | ||
| input.StakingKeeper.SetBondDenoms(ctx, []string{bondDenom}) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Inconsistent comment: Only one BondDenom added
The comment suggests adding a second BondDenom to the staking keeper, but the code only includes a single bondDenom. If the test is intended to use only the base denomination, consider updating the comment to reflect that.
Apply this diff to correct the comment:
- // add second BondDenom to staking keeper
+ // set BondDenoms to staking keeper with base denomAlternatively, if you intend to add a second bond denomination, include it in the slice:
input.StakingKeeper.SetBondDenoms(ctx, []string{bondDenom, secondBondDenom})Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
app/upgrade.go (3)
27-27: Consider using structured logging instead of fmt.PrintlnThe progress messages are helpful for debugging, but using a structured logger would be more consistent with production practices and provide better observability.
Consider using the application's logger:
-fmt.Println("upgrade to 0.6.0") +app.Logger().Info("starting upgrade process", "version", upgradeName)Also applies to: 39-39, 64-64, 102-102, 120-120
66-70: Improve error message for invalid key lengthThe error message should include more context about the expected length.
-return true, fmt.Errorf("invalid key length: %d", len(key)) +return true, sdkerrors.Wrapf(sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest, "key length %d is less than required address length %d", len(key), movetypes.AddressBytesLength)
122-125: Consider making the module list configurableThe list of stdlib modules is hardcoded. Consider moving it to a configuration file or parameter to make it more maintainable and flexible for future upgrades.
x/move/types/checksum_test.go (1)
10-12: Consider improving test data management and coverage.While the test is functional, consider these improvements for better maintainability and coverage:
- Move the large hex string to a separate test data file
- Add documentation explaining the source/significance of this test data
- Implement table-driven tests with multiple test cases
- Include negative test cases (e.g., invalid bytecode)
Example table-driven test structure:
func TestModuleBzToChecksum(t *testing.T) { tests := []struct { name string codeBzStr string wantErr bool wantChecksum string }{ { name: "valid module bytecode", codeBzStr: "a11ceb0b...", // current test case wantChecksum: "16324a588e78ed4452ef4d9d4d57be38b581a1438e86cd9d891626b856b27d3b", }, { name: "invalid hex string", codeBzStr: "invalid", wantErr: true, }, // Add more test cases } for _, tt := range tests { t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) { // Test implementation }) } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
app/upgrade.go(1 hunks)x/move/types/checksum_test.go(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
app/upgrade.go (3)
19-19: LGTM: Version upgrade to 0.6.0
The version bump is appropriate given the significant changes in module handling and checksum implementation.
131-133: Verify upgrade policy implications
The use of UpgradePolicy_COMPATIBLE needs verification to ensure it won't break existing module references.
#!/bin/bash
# Search for existing module references that might be affected
rg -A 2 "PublishModuleBundle.*UpgradePolicy" --type go82-83: Add error handling for checksum calculation
The checksum calculation result should be validated before logging.
x/move/types/checksum_test.go (3)
3-8: LGTM: Clean and minimal imports.
The imports are well-organized and include only the necessary packages for testing and hex encoding/decoding.
12-14: LGTM: Proper error handling for hex decoding.
The code correctly handles potential errors from hex decoding using require.NoError.
15-17: Verify the checksum calculation implementation.
The test verifies a specific checksum, but we should ensure the ModuleBzToChecksum implementation is consistent with Move's checksum calculation specification.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/upgrade.go (1)
Line range hint
22-122: Consider adding transaction safety.The upgrade handler is well-structured but could benefit from transaction safety. Consider wrapping the entire upgrade process in a transaction to ensure atomicity. If any step fails, all changes should be rolled back to maintain data consistency.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
app/upgrade.go(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
app/upgrade.go (4)
4-18: LGTM: Imports and version update look good.
The imports are appropriate for the required functionality, and the version update to "0.6.0" aligns with the upgrade purpose.
36-58: LGTM: Clear documentation and appropriate data structures.
The comment block clearly documents the separator changes, and the KV structure is well-designed for the migration process.
26-34:
Improve error handling consistency.
The error handling should provide more context using sdkerrors.Wrap.
Apply these changes:
- return nil, err
+ return nil, sdkerrors.Wrap(err, "failed to read code.mv stdlib")Likely invalid or redundant comment.
104-117: Verify module dependencies and add validation.
The module publishing logic looks good, but consider:
- Validating that each module bytecode is not empty
- Verifying module dependencies are correctly ordered
Let's verify the module dependencies:
app/upgrade.go
Outdated
| err = app.MoveKeeper.VMStore.Walk(ctx, nil, func(key, value []byte) (stop bool, err error) { | ||
| key = bytes.Clone(key) | ||
| value = bytes.Clone(value) | ||
|
|
||
| cursor := movetypes.AddressBytesLength | ||
| if len(key) <= cursor { | ||
| return true, fmt.Errorf("invalid key length: %d", len(key)) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| separator := key[cursor] | ||
|
|
||
| modules := make([]vmtypes.Module, len(codes)) | ||
| for i, code := range codes { | ||
| codeBz, err := base64.StdEncoding.DecodeString(code) | ||
| if separator == movetypes.ModuleSeparator { | ||
| checksum := movetypes.ModuleBzToChecksum(value) | ||
| value = checksum[:] | ||
| } else if separator >= movetypes.TableInfoSeparator { | ||
| return true, errors.New("unknown prefix") | ||
| } else { | ||
| rmKeys = append(rmKeys, bytes.Clone(key)) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| key[cursor] = key[cursor] + 1 | ||
| kvs = append(kvs, KV{ | ||
| key: key, | ||
| value: value, | ||
| }) | ||
| return false, nil | ||
| }) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| for _, key := range rmKeys { | ||
| err = app.MoveKeeper.VMStore.Remove(ctx, key) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, errors.Wrap(err, "failed to decode module code") | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| for _, kv := range kvs { | ||
| err = app.MoveKeeper.VMStore.Set(ctx, kv.key, kv.value) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, err | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add validation and improve error handling.
- The error handling at line 74 should use
sdkerrors.Wrapfor consistency. - Consider adding validation for the value length before checksum calculation.
Apply these changes:
- return true, errors.New("unknown prefix")
+ return true, sdkerrors.Wrap(sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest, "unknown separator prefix")
- checksum := movetypes.ModuleBzToChecksum(value)
+ if len(value) == 0 {
+ return true, sdkerrors.Wrap(sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest, "empty module bytecode")
+ }
+ checksum := movetypes.ModuleBzToChecksum(value)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| err = app.MoveKeeper.VMStore.Walk(ctx, nil, func(key, value []byte) (stop bool, err error) { | |
| key = bytes.Clone(key) | |
| value = bytes.Clone(value) | |
| cursor := movetypes.AddressBytesLength | |
| if len(key) <= cursor { | |
| return true, fmt.Errorf("invalid key length: %d", len(key)) | |
| } | |
| separator := key[cursor] | |
| modules := make([]vmtypes.Module, len(codes)) | |
| for i, code := range codes { | |
| codeBz, err := base64.StdEncoding.DecodeString(code) | |
| if separator == movetypes.ModuleSeparator { | |
| checksum := movetypes.ModuleBzToChecksum(value) | |
| value = checksum[:] | |
| } else if separator >= movetypes.TableInfoSeparator { | |
| return true, errors.New("unknown prefix") | |
| } else { | |
| rmKeys = append(rmKeys, bytes.Clone(key)) | |
| } | |
| key[cursor] = key[cursor] + 1 | |
| kvs = append(kvs, KV{ | |
| key: key, | |
| value: value, | |
| }) | |
| return false, nil | |
| }) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, err | |
| } | |
| for _, key := range rmKeys { | |
| err = app.MoveKeeper.VMStore.Remove(ctx, key) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, errors.Wrap(err, "failed to decode module code") | |
| return nil, err | |
| } | |
| } | |
| for _, kv := range kvs { | |
| err = app.MoveKeeper.VMStore.Set(ctx, kv.key, kv.value) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, err | |
| } | |
| } | |
| err = app.MoveKeeper.VMStore.Walk(ctx, nil, func(key, value []byte) (stop bool, err error) { | |
| key = bytes.Clone(key) | |
| value = bytes.Clone(value) | |
| cursor := movetypes.AddressBytesLength | |
| if len(key) <= cursor { | |
| return true, fmt.Errorf("invalid key length: %d", len(key)) | |
| } | |
| separator := key[cursor] | |
| if separator == movetypes.ModuleSeparator { | |
| if len(value) == 0 { | |
| return true, sdkerrors.Wrap(sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest, "empty module bytecode") | |
| } | |
| checksum := movetypes.ModuleBzToChecksum(value) | |
| value = checksum[:] | |
| } else if separator >= movetypes.TableInfoSeparator { | |
| return true, sdkerrors.Wrap(sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest, "unknown separator prefix") | |
| } else { | |
| rmKeys = append(rmKeys, bytes.Clone(key)) | |
| } | |
| key[cursor] = key[cursor] + 1 | |
| kvs = append(kvs, KV{ | |
| key: key, | |
| value: value, | |
| }) | |
| return false, nil | |
| }) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, err | |
| } | |
| for _, key := range rmKeys { | |
| err = app.MoveKeeper.VMStore.Remove(ctx, key) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, err | |
| } | |
| } | |
| for _, kv := range kvs { | |
| err = app.MoveKeeper.VMStore.Set(ctx, kv.key, kv.value) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil, err | |
| } | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
app/upgrade.go (1)
37-51: Document separator changes in code.While the comments explain the separator changes, consider adding constants for the new separator values to make the code more maintainable.
+const ( + OldTableInfoSeparator = byte(3) + NewTableInfoSeparator = byte(4) +)x/move/keeper/keeper_test.go (3)
56-76: Consider adding more test cases for checksum handling.While the basic happy path is covered, consider adding test cases for:
- Invalid module names
- Non-existent modules
- Error scenarios
Line range hint
196-249: Consider using a more robust verification approach.Instead of using a simple counter, consider:
- Creating a map of expected items
- Marking items as seen during iteration
- Verifying all expected items were seen exactly once
This would make the test more maintainable and less dependent on iteration order.
Example approach:
type ItemType int const ( ModuleItem ItemType = iota ChecksumItem ResourceItem TableEntryItem TableInfoItem ) expected := map[ItemType]bool{ ModuleItem: false, ChecksumItem: false, ResourceItem: false, TableEntryItem: false, TableInfoItem: false, } input.MoveKeeper.IterateVMStore(ctx, func(module *types.Module, checksum *types.Checksum, resource *types.Resource, tableInfo *types.TableInfo, tableEntry *types.TableEntry) { if module != nil && module.ModuleName == "BasicCoin" { require.False(t, expected[ModuleItem], "Module seen multiple times") // ... existing assertions ... expected[ModuleItem] = true } // ... similar for other items ... }) for itemType, seen := range expected { require.True(t, seen, "Item type %v was not seen during iteration", itemType) }
Line range hint
252-334: Reduce code duplication with test helpers.The setup code is duplicated from
TestIterateVMStore. Consider:
- Creating a helper function for common setup
- Using table-driven tests for both forward and reverse iteration
Example approach:
func setupIterationTest(t *testing.T, ctx sdk.Context, k keeper.Keeper) { // Common setup code here } func TestVMStoreIteration(t *testing.T) { tests := []struct { name string iterFn func(k keeper.Keeper, callback func(*types.Module, *types.Checksum, *types.Resource, *types.TableInfo, *types.TableEntry)) expectedOrder []ItemType }{ { name: "forward iteration", iterFn: keeper.IterateVMStore, expectedOrder: []ItemType{ModuleItem, ChecksumItem, ResourceItem, TableEntryItem, TableInfoItem}, }, { name: "reverse iteration", iterFn: keeper.ReverseIterateVMStore, expectedOrder: []ItemType{TableInfoItem, TableEntryItem, ResourceItem, ChecksumItem, ModuleItem}, }, } for _, tt := range tests { t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) { ctx, input := createDefaultTestInput(t) setupIterationTest(t, ctx, input.MoveKeeper) // Test implementation }) } }x/move/keeper/keeper.go (1)
201-238: Please clarify the Migration context in the comment.The implementation looks good, but the comment "This function should be used only when Migration" could be more specific about:
- Which migration scenario this applies to
- What could go wrong if used outside migration
- Whether there are any validation requirements during migration
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
app/upgrade.go(1 hunks)x/move/keeper/keeper.go(8 hunks)x/move/keeper/keeper_test.go(5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
app/upgrade.go (3)
4-19: LGTM! Imports and version constant look good.
The imports are appropriate for the required functionality, and the version bump follows semantic versioning.
91-94:
Add validation for module bytecode.
Validate that each module's bytecode is not empty before creating the module.
modules := make([]vmtypes.Module, len(codesBz))
for i, codeBz := range codesBz {
+ if len(codeBz) == 0 {
+ return nil, sdkerrors.Wrapf(sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest, "empty bytecode for module %s", stdlibModules[i])
+ }
modules[i] = vmtypes.NewModule(codeBz)
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Line range hint 22-103: Verify upgrade atomicity.
The upgrade process involves multiple steps. We should verify that if any step fails, the entire upgrade is rolled back to prevent partial upgrades.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response about the upgrade atomicity concern:
The upgrade process is atomic through Cosmos SDK's context caching mechanism
The upgrade handler operates within Cosmos SDK's context system, which provides built-in atomicity guarantees:
- All state changes during the upgrade are performed through the
VMStoreoperations (Set/Remove/Walk) - These operations are executed within the main SDK context that's passed to the upgrade handler
- If any operation fails (indicated by returned errors), the entire upgrade transaction is automatically rolled back since the changes haven't been committed to the main context
- The error handling pattern shows proper error propagation at each step:
- Module publishing errors are returned directly
- VMStore operations errors are checked and propagated
- All state modifications are properly wrapped in error checks
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for transaction handling and rollback mechanisms in the upgrade process
# Check for transaction handling in upgrade-related code
rg -A 5 "BeginTx|CommitTx|RollbackTx" --type go
# Look for error handling patterns in upgrade handlers
rg -A 5 "SetUpgradeHandler.*func.*error" --type go
Length of output: 102
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how the upgrade process is handled at a lower level
# Check for store/state management in the upgrade process
rg -A 10 "VMStore\.(Set|Remove|Walk)" --type go
# Look for any transaction or state management patterns
rg -A 10 "CacheContext|MustGetCache|WithCache" --type go
# Check for any error handling patterns in the Move keeper
rg -A 10 "MoveKeeper.*error" --type go
Length of output: 17578
x/move/keeper/keeper.go (2)
50-50: LGTM: Improved VM configuration and initialization.
The changes properly consolidate VM-related fields and ensure robust initialization with proper default values.
Also applies to: 93-105
545-552:
Consider adding null checks in the callback invocations.
The callback is invoked with multiple nullable parameters, but there are no explicit checks to ensure the callback can handle null values safely. While the current implementation ensures only one parameter is non-null at a time, this contract isn't explicitly documented or enforced.
Let's verify the callback usage:
Consider adding:
- Documentation about the callback contract
- Runtime assertions to validate the contract
- Example callback implementation in tests
Also applies to: 583-584, 591-594, 608-610, 630-633, 637-640
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...