Chore/spellcheck #73
Chore/spellcheck #73
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several changes aimed at improving spell checking and documentation clarity within the project. A new GitHub Actions workflow for automated spell checking is added, along with a list of terms to be ignored by the spell checker. Minor corrections in comments are made across various files, addressing typographical errors without impacting functionality. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant GitHubActions
participant Codespell
participant Repository
User->>Repository: Create Pull Request
Repository->>GitHubActions: Trigger spellcheck workflow
GitHubActions->>Codespell: Run spell check
Codespell->>GitHubActions: Report findings
GitHubActions->>User: Create Pull Request for corrections (if needed)
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Vritra4 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 46 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #73 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 75.78% 77.77% +1.99%
==========================================
Files 14 14
Lines 1441 1404 -37
==========================================
Hits 1092 1092
+ Misses 302 265 -37
Partials 47 47
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/spellcheck.yml (1)
3-5: Enhance workflow trigger configurationConsider specifying event types and paths to optimize workflow execution:
on: pull_request: + types: [opened, synchronize, reopened] + paths-ignore: + - '**.md' + - 'docs/**' + - 'LICENSE'
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.github/config/.codespellignore(1 hunks).github/workflows/spellcheck.yml(1 hunks)app/keepers/keepers.go(1 hunks)contrib/devtools/Makefile(2 hunks)shared.Dockerfile(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- .github/config/.codespellignore
- app/keepers/keepers.go
- contrib/devtools/Makefile
- shared.Dockerfile
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/spellcheck.yml (1)
16-16: Verify .codespellignore configuration
Ensure that .github/config/.codespellignore exists and is properly configured.
✅ Verification successful
Configuration file exists and appears properly configured
The .github/config/.codespellignore file exists and contains a list of words to be ignored by the spellchecker, which is consistent with the workflow configuration. The ignore list includes technical terms and variable names that are valid in the codebase context but might be flagged as spelling errors otherwise.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if .codespellignore exists and show its contents
if [ -f .github/config/.codespellignore ]; then
echo "Found .codespellignore file:"
cat .github/config/.codespellignore
else
echo "Warning: .codespellignore file not found at .github/config/.codespellignore"
fi
Length of output: 228
Description
similar with initia`s, add a workflow to check spell
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
.codespellignorefile with new terms to avoid false positives during spell checks.