Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

teerex refactor 3 #195

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jul 11, 2023
Merged

teerex refactor 3 #195

merged 9 commits into from
Jul 11, 2023

Conversation

brenzi
Copy link
Contributor

@brenzi brenzi commented Jul 10, 2023

closes #188, #182

  • introduce ProxiedEnclaves storage
  • allow proxied enclaves to be registered (for use by attesteer)
  • ..and unregistered when timestamp outdated
  • benchmarking updated. assuming that Dcap(proxied: false) is worst case

Copy link
Contributor

@clangenb clangenb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good in general, but I am also concerned about the padding issue of the bounded vec...

teerex/src/benchmarking.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
primitives/teerex/src/lib.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
primitives/teerex/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
teerex/src/tests/test_cases.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
@brenzi brenzi merged commit 5ca8c00 into master Jul 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[teerex] introduce separate storage for proxied enclaves
2 participants