Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update simapp #463

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 25, 2024
Merged

update simapp #463

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 25, 2024

Conversation

wangjiulian
Copy link
Collaborator

@wangjiulian wangjiulian commented Nov 21, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new DistrKeeperAdapter and GovKeeperAdapter structures to enhance governance and distribution functionalities.
    • Added methods for fee pool management and governance proposal interactions, improving context-aware operations.
  • Bug Fixes

    • No specific bug fixes were mentioned in this release.
  • Documentation

    • Enhanced internal documentation to reflect new types and methods for better usability.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request introduce modifications to the NewSimApp function in simapp/app_v2.go, adding new providers for dependency injection. Additionally, the simapp/types.go file is updated to include new types and methods, specifically DistrKeeperAdapter and GovKeeperAdapter, which enhance functionality related to distribution and governance. These additions allow for context-aware operations and improve the modularity of the application without altering any existing exported or public entity signatures.

Changes

File Change Summary
simapp/app_v2.go Modified NewSimApp function to include depinject.Provide(NewDistrKeeperAdapter, NewGovKeeperAdapter).
simapp/types.go Added DistrKeeperAdapter struct with methods GetFeePool and SetFeePool.
Added GovKeeperAdapter struct with methods: SubmitProposal, AddDeposit, GetProposal, GetGovernanceAccount.
Updated import statements for context handling and new types.

Poem

In the app where bunnies play,
New adapters join the fray! 🐇
With governance and fees in sight,
They hop along, making things right.
Context-aware, they leap and bound,
In the code, new joys are found! 🌟

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure.

🔧 golangci-lint (1.61.0)

level=warning msg="The linter 'exportloopref' is deprecated (since v1.60.2) due to: Since Go1.22 (loopvar) this linter is no longer relevant. Replaced by copyloopvar."


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
simapp/types.go (2)

21-23: Add documentation for the DistrKeeperAdapter type

Consider adding godoc comments to describe the purpose and usage of this adapter.

+// DistrKeeperAdapter provides a simplified interface to the distribution keeper
+// and handles fee pool operations in a type-safe manner.
 type DistrKeeperAdapter struct {
     keeper distrkeeper.Keeper
 }

37-39: Add documentation for the GovKeeperAdapter type

Consider adding godoc comments to describe the purpose and usage of this adapter.

+// GovKeeperAdapter provides a simplified interface to the governance keeper
+// and handles proposal and deposit operations.
 type GovKeeperAdapter struct {
     keeper *govkeeper.Keeper
 }
simapp/app_v2.go (1)

191-191: Consider documenting the adapter pattern usage

The introduction of keeper adapters represents an architectural decision to add an abstraction layer. This pattern could benefit from documentation explaining:

  • The purpose and benefits of these adapters
  • How they extend or modify the original keeper functionality
  • Any changes in how modules should interact with these keepers

Consider adding these details to:

  1. The code comments above the adapter implementations
  2. The module's documentation
  3. Any relevant ADRs (Architecture Decision Records)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 903540d and 07e2607.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • simapp/app_v2.go (1 hunks)
  • simapp/types.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
simapp/types.go (4)

3-12: LGTM! Import statements are well-organized

The imports are appropriate for the new functionality and follow Go conventions.


21-35: LGTM! DistrKeeperAdapter implementation is solid

The adapter pattern is well-implemented with proper error handling and delegation to the underlying keeper.


37-59: LGTM! GovKeeperAdapter implementation is well-structured

The adapter provides a clean interface to the governance keeper functionality with proper error handling and method delegation.


45-47: Consider standardizing context type usage

The adapter methods use context.Context while DistrKeeperAdapter uses sdk.Context. This inconsistency might lead to confusion or conversion overhead.

Also applies to: 49-51, 53-55, 57-59

simapp/app_v2.go (3)

191-191: Verify adapter implementations and their integration

The addition of NewDistrKeeperAdapter and NewGovKeeperAdapter providers suggests new adapter layers for distribution and governance functionality. Let's verify their implementation and integration.

✅ Verification successful

Adapter implementations are well-structured and properly integrated

The verification shows that both adapters are properly implemented in simapp/types.go:

  • DistrKeeperAdapter wraps distrkeeper.Keeper and provides fee pool operations
  • GovKeeperAdapter wraps govkeeper.Keeper and exposes governance functionality
  • Both adapters follow a consistent pattern with proper constructor functions
  • The adapters are correctly provided to the dependency injection system in app_v2.go
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the adapter implementations and their usage

# Check for adapter implementations
echo "Checking for adapter implementations..."
rg -p "type (Distr|Gov)KeeperAdapter struct" --type go

# Check for adapter constructors
echo "Checking for adapter constructors..."
rg -p "func New(Distr|Gov)KeeperAdapter" --type go

# Check for potential usage of these adapters
echo "Checking for adapter usage..."
rg -p "(Distr|Gov)KeeperAdapter" -A 5 --type go

Length of output: 2372


191-191: Verify existing keeper references

Since the app struct still maintains direct keeper references (DistrKeeper and GovKeeper), we should verify the relationship between these and the new adapters.

✅ Verification successful

Keeper adapters are properly implemented and aligned with app struct

The verification shows that:

  • The adapters (DistrKeeperAdapter and GovKeeperAdapter) are thin wrappers around their respective keepers
  • The app struct maintains the original keeper fields (DistrKeeper and GovKeeper)
  • The adapter constructors (NewDistrKeeperAdapter and NewGovKeeperAdapter) take the respective keepers as input
  • The adapters are provided via dependency injection, ensuring proper initialization

The relationship between the keepers and adapters is consistent and well-structured, with adapters serving as a compatibility layer while preserving the original keeper functionality.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check keeper usage patterns to ensure consistency

# Check keeper field usage in methods
echo "Checking direct keeper usage..."
rg -p "app\.(Distr|Gov)Keeper\." --type go

# Check for potential keeper initialization
echo "Checking keeper initialization..."
rg -p "(Distr|Gov)Keeper\s*=\s*" --type go

Length of output: 1022


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for the adapter implementations and their relationship with the keepers

# Check adapter implementations
echo "Checking adapter implementations..."
rg -p "type.*KeeperAdapter" --type go -A 10

# Check for keeper field declarations in app struct
echo "Checking keeper fields in app struct..."
ast-grep --pattern 'type SimApp struct {
  $$$
  DistrKeeper $_
  $$$
  GovKeeper $_
  $$$
}'

# Check for adapter initialization patterns
echo "Checking adapter initialization..."
rg -p "New(Distr|Gov)KeeperAdapter" --type go -A 5

Length of output: 3565


191-191: LGTM with testing reminder

The dependency injection configuration change looks good. Since this introduces new adapter layers, please ensure:

  1. Comprehensive tests cover the adapter implementations
  2. Integration tests verify the correct interaction between adapters and original keepers
  3. No regression in existing keeper functionality

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
simapp/types.go (1)

45-47: Consider wrapping errors with additional context

For better error debugging, consider wrapping errors with additional context using fmt.Errorf("failed to %s: %w", operation, err).

Example improvement:

func (a GovKeeperAdapter) SubmitProposal(ctx context.Context, messages []sdk.Msg, metadata, title, summary string, proposer sdk.AccAddress, expedited bool) (v1.Proposal, error) {
-    return a.keeper.SubmitProposal(ctx, messages, metadata, title, summary, proposer, expedited)
+    proposal, err := a.keeper.SubmitProposal(ctx, messages, metadata, title, summary, proposer, expedited)
+    if err != nil {
+        return v1.Proposal{}, fmt.Errorf("failed to submit proposal: %w", err)
+    }
+    return proposal, nil
}

Also applies to: 49-51, 53-55, 57-59

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 07e2607 and fdf9d2c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • simapp/types.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
simapp/types.go (5)

3-12: LGTM! Clean import organization

The imports are well-organized and all are being utilized by the new adapter implementations.


21-35: LGTM! Well-structured adapter implementation

The DistrKeeperAdapter follows the adapter pattern correctly and maintains proper error propagation.


37-59: LGTM! Comprehensive governance adapter implementation

The GovKeeperAdapter provides a clean abstraction over the governance keeper functionality.


21-23: Verify thread safety of the keeper field

Since this adapter might be used in concurrent operations, consider documenting thread safety guarantees or adding synchronization if needed.


21-59: Verify consistent usage of adapters across the codebase

These adapters introduce a new pattern for keeper interaction. Ensure this pattern is applied consistently across the codebase to maintain architectural coherence.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information to verify how these adapters are being used in the codebase.


Let me check one more aspect to see where these adapters are being consumed.


Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:

Adapters are properly scoped and consistently used within the simapp module

The adapter pattern implementation is clean and well-contained within the simapp module. The adapters are:

  • Properly defined in simapp/types.go
  • Correctly wired via dependency injection in app_v2.go
  • Not scattered across the codebase, maintaining clear module boundaries
  • Used specifically for distrkeeper.Keeper and govkeeper.Keeper interactions
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct keeper usage that might need adaptation
rg "distrkeeper\.Keeper|govkeeper\.Keeper" --type go

# Search for existing adapter patterns
rg "type \w+Adapter struct" --type go

Length of output: 569


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for adapter usage
rg "DistrKeeperAdapter|GovKeeperAdapter" --type go -A 2

# Check app initialization to see how keepers are wired
ast-grep --pattern 'func New$_App($$$) *$_App {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 2184


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for files that might be using these adapters
rg -B 2 "DistrKeeperAdapter|GovKeeperAdapter" --type go -g '!simapp/types.go' -g '!simapp/app_v2.go'

# Check if there are other similar patterns in the codebase
ast-grep --pattern 'depinject.Provide($$$)'

Length of output: 148

@mitch1024 mitch1024 merged commit 54e1414 into main Nov 25, 2024
7 checks passed
@mitch1024 mitch1024 deleted the feature/update_simapp branch November 25, 2024 07:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants