-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update simapp #463
update simapp #463
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce modifications to the Changes
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 golangci-lint (1.61.0)level=warning msg="The linter 'exportloopref' is deprecated (since v1.60.2) due to: Since Go1.22 (loopvar) this linter is no longer relevant. Replaced by copyloopvar." Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
simapp/types.go (2)
21-23
: Add documentation for the DistrKeeperAdapter typeConsider adding godoc comments to describe the purpose and usage of this adapter.
+// DistrKeeperAdapter provides a simplified interface to the distribution keeper +// and handles fee pool operations in a type-safe manner. type DistrKeeperAdapter struct { keeper distrkeeper.Keeper }
37-39
: Add documentation for the GovKeeperAdapter typeConsider adding godoc comments to describe the purpose and usage of this adapter.
+// GovKeeperAdapter provides a simplified interface to the governance keeper +// and handles proposal and deposit operations. type GovKeeperAdapter struct { keeper *govkeeper.Keeper }simapp/app_v2.go (1)
191-191
: Consider documenting the adapter pattern usageThe introduction of keeper adapters represents an architectural decision to add an abstraction layer. This pattern could benefit from documentation explaining:
- The purpose and benefits of these adapters
- How they extend or modify the original keeper functionality
- Any changes in how modules should interact with these keepers
Consider adding these details to:
- The code comments above the adapter implementations
- The module's documentation
- Any relevant ADRs (Architecture Decision Records)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
simapp/app_v2.go
(1 hunks)simapp/types.go
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
simapp/types.go (4)
3-12
: LGTM! Import statements are well-organized
The imports are appropriate for the new functionality and follow Go conventions.
21-35
: LGTM! DistrKeeperAdapter implementation is solid
The adapter pattern is well-implemented with proper error handling and delegation to the underlying keeper.
37-59
: LGTM! GovKeeperAdapter implementation is well-structured
The adapter provides a clean interface to the governance keeper functionality with proper error handling and method delegation.
45-47
: Consider standardizing context type usage
The adapter methods use context.Context
while DistrKeeperAdapter
uses sdk.Context
. This inconsistency might lead to confusion or conversion overhead.
Also applies to: 49-51, 53-55, 57-59
simapp/app_v2.go (3)
191-191
: Verify adapter implementations and their integration
The addition of NewDistrKeeperAdapter
and NewGovKeeperAdapter
providers suggests new adapter layers for distribution and governance functionality. Let's verify their implementation and integration.
✅ Verification successful
Adapter implementations are well-structured and properly integrated
The verification shows that both adapters are properly implemented in simapp/types.go
:
DistrKeeperAdapter
wrapsdistrkeeper.Keeper
and provides fee pool operationsGovKeeperAdapter
wrapsgovkeeper.Keeper
and exposes governance functionality- Both adapters follow a consistent pattern with proper constructor functions
- The adapters are correctly provided to the dependency injection system in
app_v2.go
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the adapter implementations and their usage
# Check for adapter implementations
echo "Checking for adapter implementations..."
rg -p "type (Distr|Gov)KeeperAdapter struct" --type go
# Check for adapter constructors
echo "Checking for adapter constructors..."
rg -p "func New(Distr|Gov)KeeperAdapter" --type go
# Check for potential usage of these adapters
echo "Checking for adapter usage..."
rg -p "(Distr|Gov)KeeperAdapter" -A 5 --type go
Length of output: 2372
191-191
: Verify existing keeper references
Since the app struct still maintains direct keeper references (DistrKeeper
and GovKeeper
), we should verify the relationship between these and the new adapters.
✅ Verification successful
Keeper adapters are properly implemented and aligned with app struct
The verification shows that:
- The adapters (
DistrKeeperAdapter
andGovKeeperAdapter
) are thin wrappers around their respective keepers - The app struct maintains the original keeper fields (
DistrKeeper
andGovKeeper
) - The adapter constructors (
NewDistrKeeperAdapter
andNewGovKeeperAdapter
) take the respective keepers as input - The adapters are provided via dependency injection, ensuring proper initialization
The relationship between the keepers and adapters is consistent and well-structured, with adapters serving as a compatibility layer while preserving the original keeper functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check keeper usage patterns to ensure consistency
# Check keeper field usage in methods
echo "Checking direct keeper usage..."
rg -p "app\.(Distr|Gov)Keeper\." --type go
# Check for potential keeper initialization
echo "Checking keeper initialization..."
rg -p "(Distr|Gov)Keeper\s*=\s*" --type go
Length of output: 1022
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for the adapter implementations and their relationship with the keepers
# Check adapter implementations
echo "Checking adapter implementations..."
rg -p "type.*KeeperAdapter" --type go -A 10
# Check for keeper field declarations in app struct
echo "Checking keeper fields in app struct..."
ast-grep --pattern 'type SimApp struct {
$$$
DistrKeeper $_
$$$
GovKeeper $_
$$$
}'
# Check for adapter initialization patterns
echo "Checking adapter initialization..."
rg -p "New(Distr|Gov)KeeperAdapter" --type go -A 5
Length of output: 3565
191-191
: LGTM with testing reminder
The dependency injection configuration change looks good. Since this introduces new adapter layers, please ensure:
- Comprehensive tests cover the adapter implementations
- Integration tests verify the correct interaction between adapters and original keepers
- No regression in existing keeper functionality
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
simapp/types.go (1)
45-47
: Consider wrapping errors with additional contextFor better error debugging, consider wrapping errors with additional context using
fmt.Errorf("failed to %s: %w", operation, err)
.Example improvement:
func (a GovKeeperAdapter) SubmitProposal(ctx context.Context, messages []sdk.Msg, metadata, title, summary string, proposer sdk.AccAddress, expedited bool) (v1.Proposal, error) { - return a.keeper.SubmitProposal(ctx, messages, metadata, title, summary, proposer, expedited) + proposal, err := a.keeper.SubmitProposal(ctx, messages, metadata, title, summary, proposer, expedited) + if err != nil { + return v1.Proposal{}, fmt.Errorf("failed to submit proposal: %w", err) + } + return proposal, nil }Also applies to: 49-51, 53-55, 57-59
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
simapp/types.go
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
simapp/types.go (5)
3-12
: LGTM! Clean import organization
The imports are well-organized and all are being utilized by the new adapter implementations.
21-35
: LGTM! Well-structured adapter implementation
The DistrKeeperAdapter follows the adapter pattern correctly and maintains proper error propagation.
37-59
: LGTM! Comprehensive governance adapter implementation
The GovKeeperAdapter provides a clean abstraction over the governance keeper functionality.
21-23
: Verify thread safety of the keeper field
Since this adapter might be used in concurrent operations, consider documenting thread safety guarantees or adding synchronization if needed.
21-59
: Verify consistent usage of adapters across the codebase
These adapters introduce a new pattern for keeper interaction. Ensure this pattern is applied consistently across the codebase to maintain architectural coherence.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify how these adapters are being used in the codebase.
Let me check one more aspect to see where these adapters are being consumed.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Adapters are properly scoped and consistently used within the simapp module
The adapter pattern implementation is clean and well-contained within the simapp module. The adapters are:
- Properly defined in
simapp/types.go
- Correctly wired via dependency injection in
app_v2.go
- Not scattered across the codebase, maintaining clear module boundaries
- Used specifically for
distrkeeper.Keeper
andgovkeeper.Keeper
interactions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct keeper usage that might need adaptation
rg "distrkeeper\.Keeper|govkeeper\.Keeper" --type go
# Search for existing adapter patterns
rg "type \w+Adapter struct" --type go
Length of output: 569
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for adapter usage
rg "DistrKeeperAdapter|GovKeeperAdapter" --type go -A 2
# Check app initialization to see how keepers are wired
ast-grep --pattern 'func New$_App($$$) *$_App {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 2184
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for files that might be using these adapters
rg -B 2 "DistrKeeperAdapter|GovKeeperAdapter" --type go -g '!simapp/types.go' -g '!simapp/app_v2.go'
# Check if there are other similar patterns in the codebase
ast-grep --pattern 'depinject.Provide($$$)'
Length of output: 148
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
DistrKeeperAdapter
andGovKeeperAdapter
structures to enhance governance and distribution functionalities.Bug Fixes
Documentation