Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No unique resource #56

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

molinaro-m
Copy link
Member

This pull request builds on the revert to v.1.03.
It must not be merged before #55 is merged, or reconsidered if it gets discarded.

It only relaxes the text for uniqueness of the RESOURCE(s) in the VOTable response

@molinaro-m molinaro-m marked this pull request as ready for review October 14, 2024 15:21
@molinaro-m
Copy link
Member Author

This update has now been rebased on the revert to v.1.03.
Feel free to comment and review.
RESOURCE uniqueness drop doesn't affect uniqueness of type="results" RESOURCE in ConeSearch.

Copy link
Collaborator

@msdemlei msdemlei left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm fine with the intent and the form of this change.

Github right now considers this a 9 commit-PR. I have not tried to figure out what confuses the history it sees, but I'd be confident that nothing bad will happen if you squash and merge. If, on the other hand, you insist on a merge commit, I'd first try what happens locally...

@msdemlei
Copy link
Collaborator

(and if you give me write privileges, I expect the merge block should be lifted, too)

Copy link

@gmantele gmantele left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR seems OK to me 👍

@molinaro-m molinaro-m merged commit 563ab63 into ivoa-std:master Oct 18, 2024
1 check passed
@molinaro-m molinaro-m deleted the no-unique-resource branch October 18, 2024 19:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants