Feat/no ref/red notices #3
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to three main files: the pre-commit hook script, the README file, and the test cases for the Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/services/InterpolService.test.ts (2)
6-28: Approve changes with a minor suggestion.The restructuring of tests for
getRedNoticesimproves clarity and coverage. The tests now handle both successful API calls and empty results, which is a good practice.A minor suggestion: Consider using a more descriptive name for the "impossible name" test case.
You could update line 23 as follows:
- name: "imposibble-name", + name: "non_existent_person_12345",This makes the test's intention clearer and avoids potential typos.
31-42: Approve changes with a suggestion for test independence.The tests for
getRedNoticeDetailsare well-structured, covering both successful and error scenarios. However, there's a potential issue with test independence.Consider making the successful test case independent of the
getRedNoticesresult:
- Move the
noticeIDdeclaration inside the test.- Use a mock or a known valid
noticeIDfor this test.Example refactor:
it("should return red notice details when API call is successful", async () => { const validNoticeID = "2022-1234"; // Use a known valid ID or mock const noticeDetails = await InterpolService.getRedNoticeDetails(validNoticeID); expect(noticeDetails).toBeDefined(); expect(noticeDetails.entity_id).toBe(validNoticeID.replace("-", "/")); });This change would make the test more reliable and independent of other test results.
README.md (1)
3-7: Improved image presentation and accessibility, with a minor suggestion.The changes to the Interpol notice images presentation are excellent:
- Wrapping the images in an anchor tag that links to the official Interpol notices page provides valuable context.
- Adding alt attributes to the images enhances accessibility.
However, there's a small issue to address:
The
alignattribute on the<a>tag is not valid HTML. Consider using CSS to achieve the desired alignment. Here's a suggested fix:-<a href="https://interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Notices" align="center"> +<a href="https://interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Notices" style="display: flex; justify-content: center;">This change uses flexbox to center the content horizontally, achieving the same visual effect with valid HTML/CSS.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- .husky/pre-commit (1 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- src/services/InterpolService.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/services/InterpolService.test.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-56: Overall improvement in test structure with minor suggestions.The restructuring of the
InterpolServicetests into nesteddescribeblocks significantly improves the organization and readability of the test suite. The changes provide better grouping of related tests and cover both successful and error scenarios for each method.Key improvements:
- Better organization with nested
describeblocks.- Comprehensive coverage of success and error cases.
- Addition of a warning log when no notices are found.
Suggestions for further improvement:
- Enhance test independence by using known valid IDs or mocks instead of relying on previous test results.
- Fix the typo in the
getRedNoticeDetailImageserror test.- Use more descriptive names for edge case tests.
These changes align well with best practices in test design and will contribute to a more robust and maintainable test suite.
README.md (1)
Line range hint
9-241: Document consistency maintained.The rest of the README.md file remains unchanged and consistent with the updates made to the image presentation. The document structure, content, and information provided about the library's features, usage, API reference, and legal notices are coherent and unaffected by the changes.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Tests